Stansbury doesn't want (or can't let) anyone be TOO tough on these guys, for fear it will piss them off. This is also one of the reasons we have the type of assistants we have. Nice guys, yes-men for Stansbury, good recruiters, but not disciplinarians by any stretch. They are more friends to the players than coaches.<div>
</div><div>This is why we recruit well but can't coach them up. When you kiss their asses during the recruiting process, you can lure great players, but you take a chance - sometimes you're lucky with their background, upbringing, and work ethic (Hood, Moultrie) and sometimes you're not (Sidney). Don't forget: after Renardo's high school practices, his coach would let him stand on the sideline and blow the whistle while the other players ran sprints. True story. When you recruit a player with that background, you run the inherent risk of getting somebody who expects to be coddled, or needs to continuously be told how f'ing great he is, and you can't put somebody like Balis on him or he would be straight the F out of there.</div><div>
</div><div>It's interesting to me how much it is the complete 180-degree-opposite of the way Mullen (and presumably Cohen) run their programs. They are hardasses from the get-go, and pull no punches in a recruit's house. This is, in my estimation, why Mullen misses on some big time talents, but for the most part the guys he gets are willing to work.</div>