Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Schedule
College Football Scores
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Sports Predictions
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Toggle sidebar
Teams
CFB Schedule
AP Poll
HSFB Rankings
NIL Valuations
Team Recruiting Rankings
Search
New posts
Toggle sidebar
Menu
Install the app
Install
Lane Kiffin is not the underdog at Ole Miss, no matter what he tells his LSU players
College football Polymarket predictions: Staples' best trades of Week 3
What Michael Alford's firing means for Mike Norvell, Florida State
Jake Butt claims Michigan's defense can 'take them as far as they want to go' following Oklahoma win
Whit Weeks on Lane Kiffin's return to Ole Miss: 'I know they don't like him up there'
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Looking back has different impact
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spartansstink" data-source="post: 131103619" data-attributes="member: 1488840"><p>No, you didn't say Pitt did anything special; for the simple reason they haven't. My point still stands though, WVU dropped and people took notice while Pitt, who won more games, nobody even mentioned. The question was, who would more likely to become more relevant? How can a team who won more games and not even get a mention anywhere about anything be considered relevant or even getting closer to it? Matter of fact, when you go over to the Panty-Lair there are pages of posts, from the Spitt fans themselves (all 8 of them), about how irrelevant they are - no turnouts for their games, the lack of recruiting, how their coaches suck. Again, how can this be considered being closer to relevancy when your own fan base recognizes how far away you are?</p><p></p><p>The only person emotional about this topic is you, Greg. With any post mentioning Spitt, here you come with your tiny cap guns ablazin'. One would think that being as big a fan of Spitt as you are there would be a litany of GregJacobs posts on the Panty-Lair. Not a one. Nowhere. Yet, here you are, trying to troll every thread you possibly can and keeping the few of us who try to talk WVU sports from doing so.</p><p></p><p>Finally, I notice in your post to FallingRun that you list every possible negative you can about WVU but fail to mention the positives that make Spitt the better alternative. You constantly do this - trying to get your little digs in. So, the floor is yours now, Greg. Explain to us why Spitt is closer to relevancy than WVU?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spartansstink, post: 131103619, member: 1488840"] No, you didn't say Pitt did anything special; for the simple reason they haven't. My point still stands though, WVU dropped and people took notice while Pitt, who won more games, nobody even mentioned. The question was, who would more likely to become more relevant? How can a team who won more games and not even get a mention anywhere about anything be considered relevant or even getting closer to it? Matter of fact, when you go over to the Panty-Lair there are pages of posts, from the Spitt fans themselves (all 8 of them), about how irrelevant they are - no turnouts for their games, the lack of recruiting, how their coaches suck. Again, how can this be considered being closer to relevancy when your own fan base recognizes how far away you are? The only person emotional about this topic is you, Greg. With any post mentioning Spitt, here you come with your tiny cap guns ablazin'. One would think that being as big a fan of Spitt as you are there would be a litany of GregJacobs posts on the Panty-Lair. Not a one. Nowhere. Yet, here you are, trying to troll every thread you possibly can and keeping the few of us who try to talk WVU sports from doing so. Finally, I notice in your post to FallingRun that you list every possible negative you can about WVU but fail to mention the positives that make Spitt the better alternative. You constantly do this - trying to get your little digs in. So, the floor is yours now, Greg. Explain to us why Spitt is closer to relevancy than WVU? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
×
Disable Video Player
On3
Latest
01
On3 Football
Lane Kiffin is not the underdog at Ole Miss, no matter what he tells his LSU players
02
Sports Predictions
College football Polymarket predictions: Staples' best trades of Week 3
03
On3 Football
What Michael Alford's firing means for Mike Norvell, Florida State
04
On3 Football
Jake Butt claims Michigan's defense can 'take them as far as they want to go' following Oklahoma win
05
On3 Football
Whit Weeks on Lane Kiffin's return to Ole Miss: 'I know they don't like him up there'
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Looking back has different impact
Top
Bottom