Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Samuel S" data-source="post: 129411117" data-attributes="member: 1754664">I'm almost certain an undefeated Big 12 team will finish in the top 4 even though both Baylor and OSU have terrible OOC schedules. There are enough (maybe barely) good wins from conference games that it would be sufficient for the top 4. Undefeated means something even when a schedule is not that good.I agree that Baylor, OSU or TCU would not make it with 1&nbsp; loss unless there were an almost impossible series of upsets in other conferences. One loss Oklahoma would need some help but could slide into 4th without there being no other 1 loss teams vying for&nbsp; the last spot. It has a win over Tenn. and would also have beat Baylor, TCU and OSU. I could see the committee finding it was a better choice than a 1 loss Iowa, MSU, Stanford, Clemson.... ND would probably get picked over OU with 1 loss because of bias and the fact it trounced Texas while Oklahoma lost to it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Samuel S, post: 129411117, member: 1754664"] I'm almost certain an undefeated Big 12 team will finish in the top 4 even though both Baylor and OSU have terrible OOC schedules. There are enough (maybe barely) good wins from conference games that it would be sufficient for the top 4. Undefeated means something even when a schedule is not that good. I agree that Baylor, OSU or TCU would not make it with 1 loss unless there were an almost impossible series of upsets in other conferences. One loss Oklahoma would need some help but could slide into 4th without there being no other 1 loss teams vying for the last spot. It has a win over Tenn. and would also have beat Baylor, TCU and OSU. I could see the committee finding it was a better choice than a 1 loss Iowa, MSU, Stanford, Clemson.... ND would probably get picked over OU with 1 loss because of bias and the fact it trounced Texas while Oklahoma lost to it. [/QUOTE]

Name