From your previous posts:
<span style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"> <span style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"> <font size="2">the guy won 11 games his whole career, was never All-SEC, and never led the team at tackles.</font></span></span>
<span style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"><font size="2">but if my memory serves me correctly Norwood holds school records, was All-SEC preseason and post season and was DRAFTED. I forgot, Culberson is not even in the top 5 in any statistical category. Norwood rewrote that section on the media guide through his accomplishments.</font></span>
<font size="2">So, in your mind, Culberson is overrated because he never led the team in tackles (even though he did in fact lead the team in tackles his
senior year), was never selected for pre or post season awards (although he was in both
03 & 04 & probably 05 & 06 thought I can't find that info right now), was on a team that only won 11 games during his career, and was undrafted. Yet, since Norwood set records and was drafted, it doesn't matter that the teams he was on sucked from a record standpoint. Did it ever occur to you that part of the reason Culberson might have been undrafted was because he played 4 different positions in his 4 years: CB in 03 for 8 games until he broke his leg, S briefly, OLB, and finally MLB. Is it possible he was undrafted simply because he was inexperienced compared to other LB in his draft class? Maybe I see things differently, but the fact that Culberson has made a team as undrafted FA, much less is in a position to be competing for a starting spot, means he was UNDERrated by scouts prior to the draft, not overrated.</font>