LOL A Natl reporter added his name and the tweets from the AUB fanbase on his name were laughed at. He sure the hell aint going to be getting no inteview for that spot . Aub fanbase would kill their AD. You dont fie a coach for 21 plus mil too hire Sattefield.
Typical Auburn. Auburn coaches typically have a three game grace period and an AD with an itchy trigger finger. Remember the airport meeting? IIRC the coach they were about to replace went 13-0 the following year.
Beat me to it, Mike. I had a similar thought but was having trouble putting it into words.
Looks like a perfect candidate for the Tennessee job if Tennessee gets rid of their coach.
It would be an incredibly shi**y thing to do to Ole Miss. Leave after one year for a fellow SECW program? But, Kiffin is a douche, so maybe he would do that.
Actually the “OP” started another thread about sports.
If you’re 2-8 and the laughing stock of the nation, pay whatever is takes.
That's certainly what your AD decided to do before the real financial bleeding started. Pure genius...
Not everyone makes the right decision for themselves. But it was a DECISION and not a requirement.
The topic was Auburn’s decision to fire a coach and honor his legal contract. Unfortunately for you, it showcased another incorrect - many people are calling it dumb I hear - take by you.
As proven in other threads - your links don’t remotely come close to proving your point. The two links you posted earlier were complete garbage.
You prove nothing except you're incapable or unwilling to understand. Not my problem...
People here - myself included - understand your shtick all too well. You post outlandish opinion and fail to find supporting evidence to lend it credence. The articles you do link aren’t germane yet you link them despite knowing that. And when called out on your intentional intellectual dishonesty, you get huffy.
One thing I don’t get. You claim Vince NQ, by honoring a contract which he is legally and morally obliged to do, spent $14 mm buying out Bobby when he could have spent less. Then you criticize him for not meeting Brohm’s money demand and spending less on Satterfield. Even in your imaginary world where contracts aren’t real, wouldn’t he have just given the money he owed Bobby to Brohm? How would we be better off?
And if we went 2-10 in 2019 with Bobby, the stands would have been empty and the donors would have given even less.
Easy answer to your question--he'd have Brohm and not Satterfield.
Are you implying that the stands have been full and that donors are standing in line to give since Satterfield was hired? I hope not...
Uncovered a little more about your Auburn example. This is good stuff...
