Looking around some oftheirsites, everyone of them have gone into fulldefensivedismissal mode. If it was so bad why do they care so much? I expected a little bit of blow back but nothing like it is. Insecure much?<div>
</div>
</div>
Thanks for the insight into why the real people of Mississippi broke away from thearistocratic elitesin Oxford & formed their own university.In the article, you have copious use of stereotyping, lack of an accurate understanding of current state issues, not to mention the timeline problems that your board has already mentioned. He demonstrates only groupthink and boosterism..
Who cares what you think? It is a shame that none of the professors in <Rule 18>feel as strongly aboutTSUN and her Bears!Syd and Harrys said:I'll preface this by saying I don't surf many sports sites, so I've only seen Nafoom's reaction. Obviously, I can't speak for everyone's reaction to this nor would I want to.
In the article, you have copious use of stereotyping, lack of an accurate understanding of current state issues, not to mention the timeline problems that your board has already mentioned. He demonstrates only groupthink and boosterism, which you might want in the diehard fan (it's demonstrated quite well in the responses posted to the article), but do you really want this from a faculty member at MSU?
I would be horrified if one of the professorate at OM had written such an article; I'm embarrassed for you. If I were his chair, I would seriously question his ability to lead a class at a research-based institution. If this is what you consider appropriate behavior from a faculty member, I can't help you.
It has nothing to do with being a "fan" and being a professor. It's wonderful that he's a fan, goes to games, and is active on campus. In fact, I think that if it were written by Gene no one would have batted an eye, but the fact that such hogwash (and that's what it is, be it written by someone from OM or MSU) was generated by one of your professors is shameful.</p>
Grammar, coherence, and professional tact were all present, unlike anything that Upchuck writes. Even you should know that by now.RebelBruiser said:That was my primary take on it.
. . . like Ole Miss's consensus "national championships?" We understand.Skink said:. . . I would fail him for <span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">factual inaccuracies, lack of critical thinking, and relying too much on anecdotal information</span> that could not be proven to make his point