Weak.To bad your sire didn’t.
Shane is no idiot….
Weak.To bad your sire didn’t.
Shane is no idiot….
If Cutter or Nolad are even remotely competent, or Duckworth is what he's projected, then we'll be fine.A loyalist acquaintance who has Columbia tentacles to the inside. Stuff he says tends to be solid.
I briefly misread that tentacles partA loyalist acquaintance who has Columbia tentacles to the inside. Stuff he says tends to be solid.
Deal was needed to get him here. Why else would he come here for Shane's last season? Donati has already made the decision if Beamer is his coach or not. So that's one way.How would that happen?
Deal was needed to get him here. Why else would he come here for Shane's last season? Donati has already made the decision if Beamer is his coach or not. So that's one way.
I think Donati wanted to fire Beams after the season but was given the directive that he gets another year. Have you seen that schedule? You think Shane's going to have a good season? Shane's gone.It would be difficult. Shane would have to have a bad seaon to be let go. But Briles would have to do well enough to earn the interim and then next coach title.
How does Briles do that well while the overall team still fails?
Interesting take on the hire but do you have any proof? And given you are correct in your prognostication of Beamer’s future, can you answer Lurker‘s question of how Briles would come out smelling like roses if they failed?I think Donati wanted to fire Beams after the season but was given the directive that he gets another year. Have you seen that schedule? You think Shane's going to have a good season? Shane's gone.
Interesting take on the hire but do you have any proof? And given you are correct in your prognostication of Beamer’s future, can you answer Lurker‘s question of how Briles would come out smelling like roses if they failed?
Do i have proof?Interesting take on the hire but do you have any proof? And given you are correct in your prognostication of Beamer’s future, can you answer Lurker‘s question of how Briles would come out smelling like roses if they failed?
Do i have proof?
You want a signed statement from the AD's office? You guys kill me. But to answer Lurker's question. Briles is a proven commodity. He can survive a bad season with a bad team. Then begins the rebuild.
Weak.
![]()
A proven commodity? I didn’t know Briles had been a HC. /sDo i have proof?
You want a signed statement from the AD's office? You guys kill me. But to answer Lurker's question. Briles is a proven commodity. He can survive a bad season with a bad team. Then begins the rebuild.
A proven commodity? I didn’t know Briles had been a HC. /s
I find it hard to believe if the Gamecocks go 4-8 again next year that Briles could be sold to fans as the answer going forward. They would have had a whole season to dissect his every move and explain why Beamer hired the wrong OC again (more /s) and we need to move on from the entire staff.
That's fine.A proven commodity? I didn’t know Briles had been a HC. /s
I find it hard to believe if the Gamecocks go 4-8 again next year that Briles could be sold to fans as the answer going forward. They would have had a whole season to dissect his every move and explain why Beamer hired the wrong OC again (more /s) and we need to move on from the entire staff.
FWIW, there's a reddit thread out there about us hiring Briles. I can tell you we came out of thread looking like fools and a laughing stock. Some very angry gamecock fans and other teams piling on with our "terrible" decision.
Either way, next season, it all comes to a head.
FWIW, there's a reddit thread out there about us hiring Briles. I can tell you we came out of thread looking like fools and a laughing stock. Some very angry gamecock fans and other teams piling on with our "terrible" decision.
Either way, next season, it all comes to a head.