I didn’t lock it. Honest question before this goes off the rails. What factual evidence could make you change your mind about Macron being a man?
Like I said in the original thread, I didn't have any kind of opinion on it before watching Tucker's interview with Candace. Had a passing knowledge of what was being alleged, and early on thought it was nuts, like most anybody who doesn't bath in conspiracy mania (I generally don't) would.
Guys running some podcasts I like were indicating that they had changed their mind after Candace's series. Had time yesterday so I watched the interview.
Without going down the road, there appears to be a lot of stuff that is just plain strange and creepy about the whole relationship. Maybe it's all manufactured by the people making the allegations, I don't know.
If there were lots of pictures of her as a child and as an adult with her supposed biological kids, in the hospital after birth holding babies it would be way less questionable. Maybe those exist and they just haven't been made obvious. That would help, but short of that it seems she (he?) could make all this go away pretty easily.
I don't know what exact independent medical tests to run to prove maleness, but I'm certain they exist. Just do that and provide the results and it's over. Or simply have one of your kids tested and show that you are their biological mother, as she (he?) claims.
What's interesting to me is, after COVID and the clear lying that both parties in this country do on a nauseatingly constant basis, why jump to the conclusion they're ever telling the truth?? I honestly start by assuming a politician is lying and work from there. I wasn't always this way.
