A
Yes,me tooOriginally posted by GLR5555:
It looked deliberate to me.
He should play free safety.Originally posted by Wernicke Korsakoff:
https://vine.co/v/ODjhtigHtdm
I like to think it will be reviewed but I really have no idea what the SEC policy on things like this is. All I know is that the cheap-shot was very unwarranted and completely uncalled for. Should have been a flagrant on the spot.Originally posted by Wernicke Korsakoff:
Plays where someone intentionally tries to hurt other players should be reviewed and players should be retroactively punished. This kind of behavior should not go unnoticed by the SEC.
...and nessler made the comment during the replay. it was so ridiculous i actually laughed out load. the replay showed an obvious intentional hit...there was no "tangle up"....not even close.Originally posted by hotelblue:
nessler said they got "tangled up". i looked up and saw that hockey check hawk in the rib cage across the floor. the guy didn't make a play on the ball, it should have been a flagrant foul.
This post was edited on 1/14 10:46 AM by Bluest MemberThey called a regular foul didn't they? Should have definitely been a Flagrant II
He definitely did it intentionally. He ran out at Andrew and instead of challenging with his hands high he punched in the jewels.Originally posted by teach them linear:
There was no replay but I would like to see if he intentionally hit andrew in the nuts. Andrew had something to say to him before he went to the line.
Originally posted by wildcatdonf:
And I think he is a Liberal. j/k.
Originally posted by IIIBradIII:
Anyone know how to contact the sec office responsible for reviewing this sort of thing? That was an illegal block in the back even in football and has noplace at all on the hardwood. That mizz player should be punished retroactively as that was an intent to injure someone.
Sorry but this reminds me of the Louisville fan who said the right people are going to hear about this.Originally posted by IIIBradIII:
Anyone know how to contact the sec office responsible for reviewing this sort of thing? That was an illegal block in the back even in football and has noplace at all on the hardwood. That mizz player should be punished retroactively as that was an intent to injure someone.