Bringing my response over from the Poli Thread with a couple of updates:
Here is a summary of the timeline based on my understanding having read the article:
1. September, one individual, unidentified and not verified, used a racial slur against the President of the Mizzou Student Union as he walked across campus. No threats, just racial slurs.
2. The Legion of Black Collegians, while preparing for an activity, had "a young man” talking on his cellphone walked up to the group. After being politely and repeatedly asked to leave, the man walked away but referenced LBC members using racial slurs."
3. Someone doodled a swastika in feces somewhere on campus. No comments, no threat--just a swastika. (I'm surprised the Jewish Campus Organization hasn't brought up Anti-Semitic rhetoric.)
From this point on, there were no other cited racial incidents. Everything else mentioned relates to various protests by the students and their perceived lack of response by the university President. The President, based on what I read, didn't actually do anything, other than not reply to their demands in a manner which they expected. If you read through the timeline, the President did respond on multiple occasions to some degree...again, just not enough to their liking.
I'm sorry, but if there's not more than this--F'em. Over a period of two months that's all they have to complain about? I'm sure if you polled the Whites, the Hispanics, the Indians, the French, the Lesbians/Gays/Transgenders, the Handicapped, the Harry Potter fans,the Jews, the Orientals, the Forestry Club, the Swim Team, the members of the Glee Club, the Fraternities,the Calorically Challenged, the Frisbee Golf team, the Cheerleaders, the Sororities, etc. you would find at least this many incidents of improper abuse for each group.
What if you asked all of the African-American football players that went on strike, "Have you used an improper or racially insensitive comment in the past 60 days directed at someone of another race?." If they answered truthfully, do you really think there would be less than 3 instances across all 30+ players?
Or if you asked virtually ANY random group of 30 students the same question, would they pass the sensitivity test?
Racism has no place anywhere, but if we are going to hold one person accountable for the actions of 30,000-40,000 people over a 2-3 month timeframe? I think we are setting the bar a little too high.
Final question: Have you, either directly or indirectly made any type of racially or stereotypical insensitive comment over the past 60 days? (This includes outright comments to a specific individual and/or an audible comment that at least one other person heard. I won't even bother with what you think and/or mumble under your breath.)
Here is a summary of the timeline based on my understanding having read the article:
1. September, one individual, unidentified and not verified, used a racial slur against the President of the Mizzou Student Union as he walked across campus. No threats, just racial slurs.
2. The Legion of Black Collegians, while preparing for an activity, had "a young man” talking on his cellphone walked up to the group. After being politely and repeatedly asked to leave, the man walked away but referenced LBC members using racial slurs."
3. Someone doodled a swastika in feces somewhere on campus. No comments, no threat--just a swastika. (I'm surprised the Jewish Campus Organization hasn't brought up Anti-Semitic rhetoric.)
From this point on, there were no other cited racial incidents. Everything else mentioned relates to various protests by the students and their perceived lack of response by the university President. The President, based on what I read, didn't actually do anything, other than not reply to their demands in a manner which they expected. If you read through the timeline, the President did respond on multiple occasions to some degree...again, just not enough to their liking.
I'm sorry, but if there's not more than this--F'em. Over a period of two months that's all they have to complain about? I'm sure if you polled the Whites, the Hispanics, the Indians, the French, the Lesbians/Gays/Transgenders, the Handicapped, the Harry Potter fans,the Jews, the Orientals, the Forestry Club, the Swim Team, the members of the Glee Club, the Fraternities,the Calorically Challenged, the Frisbee Golf team, the Cheerleaders, the Sororities, etc. you would find at least this many incidents of improper abuse for each group.
What if you asked all of the African-American football players that went on strike, "Have you used an improper or racially insensitive comment in the past 60 days directed at someone of another race?." If they answered truthfully, do you really think there would be less than 3 instances across all 30+ players?
Or if you asked virtually ANY random group of 30 students the same question, would they pass the sensitivity test?
Racism has no place anywhere, but if we are going to hold one person accountable for the actions of 30,000-40,000 people over a 2-3 month timeframe? I think we are setting the bar a little too high.
Final question: Have you, either directly or indirectly made any type of racially or stereotypical insensitive comment over the past 60 days? (This includes outright comments to a specific individual and/or an audible comment that at least one other person heard. I won't even bother with what you think and/or mumble under your breath.)
Last edited: