MSU football better than MSU basketball?

[DAWG61]

Last year MSU finished #15 in football and has had back to back winning seasons and bowl wins. With MSU on the verge of a total collapse and not making the NCAA again has the football program become better than the basketball program?

 

[thatsbaseball]

but this past year`s football team underachieved somewhat like our basketball has become notorious for.However Mullen has only been in charge of his program a few years while Stans has been at it a long time. Itruly don`t know what Mullen`s upside is butit`s become obvious that all we can expect from Stans is more of the same.

I know this, for a school our size in the SEC the chances for being really successful in football are only a fraction of what they are in basketball. I.E. Mullen`s job is a hell of a lot tougher than Stans`. IMO

 

[hotdigitydog]

nnt

 

[FlabLoser]

Football definitely has more upside. Mullen hasn't had the time to get all the pieces in place and the team is pretty good.

Basketball has peaked. And not from a talent deficiency. I'm not sure Stans could consistently get KY's roster into the tournament.

 

[fishwater99]

Both teams started the season with high expectations and underperformed, even though basketball is not over yet....we are much closer to the #1 team in the country in talent level in basketball, very far away in football.. So no basketball is still king...