MSU QB

madisoninsider

Redshirt
Jun 6, 2012
25
0
0
Tyler has really matured and from comments I've heard from coaches, he will have a breakout year. I know that's not news to most of you, but it's one of the few times the coaches have spoken to me with this much confidence.
 

madisoninsider

Redshirt
Jun 6, 2012
25
0
0
Tyler has really matured and from comments I've heard from coaches, he will have a breakout year. I know that's not news to most of you, but it's one of the few times the coaches have spoken to me with this much confidence.
 
Aug 5, 2011
1,222
0
0
We need to find a way to get the ball to #80 a lot more and hopefully ourreceiverscan get someseparationto give Tyler the opportunity to throw the ball downfield. Also, on the other side of the ball, our DB's need to play up on thereceiverswhen we play teams like Upig and TAMU. We are playing off to keep from giving up the deep ball, but it did not work against Ark last year and no adjustment was made. Bama, LSU and Kansas St. in the bowl game were physical with their receivers and were able to slow down the passing game. I will stick with my previous prediction of 6-6 or 7-5. If we get lucky we may be able to win 8.
 

weblow

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
2,860
3
38
he will be fine. He is going to need to be much lighter on his feet than I have seen him so far to have any success.
 

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
has he grown enough as a QB to not force the ball and turn it over?

He has a very good arm
No, he wont outrun anybody- but he wont have to this season
He will have a playbook more suited to his skill set

Can he keep from turning the ball over this season? That is what made Relf a decent QB. If Russell can minimize TO's- he will be very good
 

bertier

Redshirt
Aug 19, 2009
57
0
0
That was pleasantly surprised with his speed last year? When he ran the Relf option he didn't look too terribly slow to me. Maybe I am just used to the Kevin Fants and Michael Henigs. Of course there is a noticeable difference between him and Relf speed-wise. I honestly think his reads were what made that option look bad when he was under center last year, not his speed.

Just felt the need to point that out. He's certainly no Relf, but he isn't the slowest QB we've ever had at MSU. Hopefully we won't need to use his legs too much next year, but I bet we see a lot more read options than people would expect next year.
 
S

Sauron

Guest
He didn't. Dude wasn't that fast, folks. He was just a bull. It took three people to drag him down most times. His arm was never more than mediocre and more often than not was down right bad. In short, he wasn't that great of a QB. Russell, with this offense, will be twice the QB poor old Chris ever was. If Tyler learns to take a hit without breaking or just throw the ball away when the play aint there, we will be just fine at QB.
 

shotgunDawg

Redshirt
Nov 13, 2011
2,035
0
0
Sauron, you are correct that Relf is not much faster than Russell in straight line speed. However, Relf was more "agile", athletic, and lighter on his feet than Russell. You are correct in that it isn't pure speed though. That being said, Tom Brady and Peyton Manning are heavy footed as well. To compensate, Russell needs to develop pocket awareness, assuming there is a pocket, and some moves to make one guy miss.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,063
25,104
113
He's definitely in the Chris Leak mode in this offense, but he's still enough of a threat on the option that if teams don't play it honestly, he will burn them.
 

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
unfortunately QB's need those as well. Tyler is light years ahead of Relf in accuracy and touch- and for the most part makes better decisions. He simply will have to stand up to the rush and eliminate turnovers.

Tyler doesnt have concrete shoes, but he's no scrambler either
 
S

Sauron

Guest
Relf could never seem to get reading a D down. I don't know why. Relf was definitely an athlete. He just didn't really have any business playing QB at the college level IMO.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,063
25,104
113
He was a much better runner than Russell is, but he was strictly a power runner. He wasn't ever going to make anybody miss him. But he could damn sure run right through a buch of people. Coach is right, Relf had a very strong arm. He just wasn't very accurate and didn't make good, quick decisions. Russell's arm is probably a little weaker than Relf's (still plenty strong though), he's just more accurate and makes better decisions.
 

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
Sauron said:
Relf could never seem to get reading a D down. I don't know why. Relf was definitely an athlete. He just didn't really have any business playing QB at the college level IMO.
 

smootness

Redshirt
Apr 29, 2009
296
0
0
shotgunDawg said:
Sauron, you are correct that Relf is not much faster than Russell in straight line speed. However, Relf was more "agile", athletic, and lighter on his feet than Russell. You are correct in that it isn't pure speed though. That being said, Tom Brady and Peyton Manning are heavy footed as well. To compensate, Russell needs to develop pocket awareness, assuming there is a pocket, and some moves to make one guy miss.
I couldn't disagree with this more. Relf was awful as a scrambler. He was great when called upon to run because once he got a head of steam, you couldn't bring him down. But if he was standing in the pocket and the rush closed in, it was an automatic sack. He had no quickness in the pocket at all. <div>
</div><div>I've actually been very pleased at times with Russell's pocket awareness. He has an ability to sense the rush and make subtle moves to avoid it; there have just been many times where our protection completely collapsed and there was nothing he could do. The kid was a sophomore last year, he's going to be just fine. I have no idea why so many nitpick over him when our history at QB is as bad as it gets. I fully expect him, over the next two years, to become the best QB in our history.</div><div>
</div><div>And I would bet Russell would at least tie Relf in a race over 20-30 yards. Relf was a brutally effective runner because of his build, toughness, and technique. It had nothing to do with his speed.</div>
 

AustinDawg

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
149
0
0
It's amazing how much better Relf got as a passer over his career. While not a Peyton Manning, he went from not being able to hit a barn, to being able to
mostly hit folks. As long as he didn't have to read the D for too long he was markedly better.

I think we will all agree that a huge part of the issues we had last season were the injuries on the offensive line. The timing of the injuries was terrible, but also, we didn't have the depth to recover from them -- and that threw the offense into a tailspin. I imagine it didn't help either QBs confidence that much either.

While I thought Tyler would quickly surpass Relf, part of that is also Relf stepping up and leading. It's good that we don't have to throw QBs into the fire immediately any more.

And to agree with Peaches ... not turning the ball over and managing the offense goes a long way towards keeping a starting QB job.
 

MonkeyCheese

Redshirt
Dec 1, 2008
599
0
0
patdog said:
He was a much better runner than Russell is, but he was strictly a power runner. He wasn't ever going to make anybody miss him. <font size="4" style="background-color: rgb(0, 0, 153);">But he could damn sure run right through a buch of people</font>. Coach is right, Relf had a very strong arm. He just wasn't very accurate and didn't make good, quick decisions. Russell's arm is probably a little weaker than Relf's (still plenty strong though), he's just more accurate and makes better decisions.
I still can't figure out how he didn't score on the last play of that game.
 

BlankStare

Redshirt
Apr 22, 2009
120
0
0
Worrying about who is faster is a "tallest midget" contest... but at least can get downfield.<span>
 

smootness

Redshirt
Apr 29, 2009
296
0
0
It isn't like somebody stood him up or knocked him backward. He got his feet taken out from under him, pretty simple.
 

Dawg in a pile

Redshirt
Feb 27, 2008
563
0
0
One thing Relf had that Russell doesn't is Ballard. I hope Griffin
Can take on that role but it's going to take time for either Griffin, Perkins,
or Robinson to take up that slack.
 

Mjoelner

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2006
2,666
1,123
113
<span><span id="temp-1"></span></span>BlankStare said:
<div><span><span><span id="temp-1"></span></span></span></div><div><span><span>
</span></span></div><div>Anyways, if Russell's footspeed is a topic of interest next year...then the ******* may be full?</div>
 

BiscuitEater

Redshirt
Aug 29, 2009
4,178
0
36
Sauron said:
Relf could never seem to get reading a D down. I don't know why. Relf was definitely an athlete. He just didn't really have any business playing QB at the college level IMO.


he currently ranks #2 in MSU football history in passing accuracy.
 
Aug 5, 2011
1,222
0
0
and I agree that having a playbook to suit his skill set is key. The other question mark for me is the O-line. I'm very concerned about our line and this is why I predict 6-7 wins instead of 8-9 wins in theregularseason. Keeping Russell healthy, and Russell having time to make decisions will be the difference.
 

BiscuitEater

Redshirt
Aug 29, 2009
4,178
0
36
BogeyGolfer said:
Also, on the other side of the ball, our DB's need to play up on thereceiverswhen we play teams like Upig and TAMU. We are playing off to keep from giving up the deep ball, but it did not work against Ark last year and no adjustment was made. I will stick with my previous prediction of 6-6 or 7-5. If we get lucky we may be able to win 8.


Key to the CBs moving up closer to the line is a consistant pass rush. We are blessed with great corners BUT without greater pressure on the QB, there is no way for them keep them covered.
 

maroonmania

Senior
Feb 23, 2008
11,086
729
113
that's what we had with Relf that I still am VERY shaky on with Russell. Whatever we get with Russell in the run game is strictly a bonus but the REAL key is keeping him healthy. First off, Russell doesn't do a good job of avoiding a flush hit when he runs and secondly he is more prone to injury when he does get hit. Russell has already had knee and other physical issues and if he goes down early in the year we are in a bad spot. Prescott may be good down the road but he doesn't look ready to me based on what I saw in the Spring game.
 
S

Sauron

Guest
BiscuitEater said:
Sauron said:
Relf could never seem to get reading a D down. I don't know why. Relf was definitely an athlete. He just didn't really have any business playing QB at the college level IMO.


he currently ranks #2 in MSU football history in passing accuracy.
I bleed Maroon and White. My heart beat says: "Hail State", but.....friend....in case you haven't noticed, that really isn't saying that much. Relf was certainly better as a passer after Mullen got a-hold of him. But lets be serious for a second and admit that he was never anything to write home about when it came to flinging the ball around.
 

Johnson85

Redshirt
Nov 22, 2009
1,206
0
0
but let's not forget that Ballard was an NFL back in his own right. We might very well have another NFL back or two in the pipeline, but it's not like it's guaranteed and it's definitely not guaranteed that they can pick up blitzes, which is probably what i'm more worried about, as I do agree we should always have a solid rotation of guys that can run the ball.
 

RougeDawg

Redshirt
Jul 12, 2010
1,474
0
0
He could have the greatest arm of any QB to ever play the game, but his footwork/speed wouldn't allow him to fully utilize it.

I have not seen much, if any, improvement in his footwork over two years. To have a breakout year, he's going to have to make a decent amount of improvised plays with his feet. From what he's displayed previously, I do not see these busted plays resulting in positive outcomes for our offense. At least with Relf, he could bulldoze a defender or two on a busted play and outrun a few, resulting in a few positive plays from nothing. With Tyler the case is completely different.