My confidence in Shula as OC
- Thread starter gamecox4982
- Start date
After watching the bowl game, I had to give it 50%.
Not a large enough body of work to determine that, for me at least.
Sincerely hoping the bowl game was not his best effort.
That's where I am. The bowl game was not a good showing, but it could be explained a number of ways.
Yes, it could be explained a number of ways which is why my vote wasn't lower. There is no doubt the dude has a great mind for the game but it's the intangibles I am not so sure about.
Here we go. Same crap we say every year about every o coordinator.
You guys realize he was calling D. Loggains offense, no time to get his own installed. I think we're good until further notice, he has the resume!
Significantly higher than you as a poster.
This gem is on the heels of "If Beamer goes 5 - 7 will he be on the hot seat?"
And two weeks ago you're proclaming:
And then this stroke of genius two weeks before that:
Botman - Is this one of your Dark BOTs?
It doesn't seem you pulled over CockyTalk84 or Gamecock24/7 of Rivals fame.
Replacement players?
Loggains was hired to be head coach at App State.
But it isn't fair. LonesomeRooster above just corrected you.
Piscis used the same "To be fair" phrase a few days ago in an attempt to degrade the A&M win.
You're getting sloppy, Botman.
I don't see how you can land on evidence-based reason for anything other than 50% confidence. He has not given us any reason to think he can or cannot do the job.
And Satterfield was "promoted" to Nebraska.
Would it help to word it as "neither was going to be retained"?
They were hot properties who were snatched from us.
As mentioned previously, our offense was in the Top 3 in the country for the second half of last season.
It also came in just behind Alabama in total offense for the year.
This frog is a disingenuous dimwit.
If you're going to be a chronic closet troll, you have to be better than this frog.
Maybe it's just me, but astronomical scales are a bit too large for representing competencies in sports.That's a low bar though.
Nope….Loggains took head job at App State. Other guy left for Nebraska.
Loggains play calls were excellent for the most part but many times the players were running for their life because of lack of execution. Other times the play was perfect and the ball was overthrown or dropped. It’s called Football, but you can’t run anything if you don’t block and execute.
I take it you are 100% confident then. Can you explain why?
To be clear, I did not say am confident or not confident. We have no body of work to judge him on, so I'm curious what you're basing your evaluation on.
It has nothing to do with support. We all support him. Just curious your reasoning for being 100% confident.
Last edited:
I'm 100% confident that you're a BOT currently in damage control once again as this troll thread hasn't gone very well for "you guys."
The frog wasn't fairing well so bring in the backups.
i was in the 75%tile group. I think he is really helped by having Sellers in Backfield. I would maybe even go higher is Faison was a Go..
I voted 50% because, like most, not enough info. What you're saying is important information. Do you happen to have a link by chance? TIA.
It’s the only reasonable conclusion at this juncture. Of course we all hope he ends up to be the best OC in the game but at this point there is simply no way to know one way or the other so we have no rational basis to say anything other than 50%.
anyone who says more than 50% is confusing support with confidence.
Thanks but that was the first place I went when he was first hired. I thought you had a link about what you were talking about.