My last post on scheduling awhile...

[Coach34]

Meo say:

"Typically, the SEC is among the top 2-3 conferences, and it really doesn't make a **** bit of difference who we play out of the league. Our conference schedule is more than enough to maintain a high RPI. Again, I go back to 2004. We did not play much of a non-conference schedule as HD6 pointed out, but we had a top 10 RPI at the end of the year and got a 2 seed."

Meo c'mon

2007- SEC West champs- 8-8....left out of Tourney
2008- SEC West Champs- 2nd in the SEC- 8 seed in Tourney
2009- 9-7 in SEC- had to win SEC Tourney to make NCAA's- 13 seed after winning SECTourney

Am I a douchebag? Maybe
Is anybody a blithering moron for saying we shouldnt upgrade our schedule after whats transpired the last 3 years in the SEC? Damn right they are
Last 10 years- SEC is tied for 5th in FF appearances- means its a lower-level conference

When you cant make the NCAA's fo sho when going .500 in conference with a winning OOC schedule, there's a problem

deny it all you want...nobody can prove me wrong here...nobody

 

[Coach34]

Meo say:

"Typically, the SEC is among the top 2-3 conferences, and it really doesn't make a **** bit of difference who we play out of the league. Our conference schedule is more than enough to maintain a high RPI. Again, I go back to 2004. We did not play much of a non-conference schedule as HD6 pointed out, but we had a top 10 RPI at the end of the year and got a 2 seed."

Meo c'mon

2007- SEC West champs- 8-8....left out of Tourney
2008- SEC West Champs- 2nd in the SEC- 8 seed in Tourney
2009- 9-7 in SEC- had to win SEC Tourney to make NCAA's- 13 seed after winning SECTourney

Am I a douchebag? Maybe
Is anybody a blithering moron for saying we shouldnt upgrade our schedule after whats transpired the last 3 years in the SEC? Damn right they are
Last 10 years- SEC is tied for 5th in FF appearances- means its a lower-level conference

When you cant make the NCAA's fo sho when going .500 in conference with a winning OOC schedule, there's a problem

deny it all you want...nobody can prove me wrong here...nobody

 

[Coach34]

Meo say:

"Typically, the SEC is among the top 2-3 conferences, and it really doesn't make a **** bit of difference who we play out of the league. Our conference schedule is more than enough to maintain a high RPI. Again, I go back to 2004. We did not play much of a non-conference schedule as HD6 pointed out, but we had a top 10 RPI at the end of the year and got a 2 seed."

Meo c'mon

2007- SEC West champs- 8-8....left out of Tourney
2008- SEC West Champs- 2nd in the SEC- 8 seed in Tourney
2009- 9-7 in SEC- had to win SEC Tourney to make NCAA's- 13 seed after winning SECTourney

Am I a douchebag? Maybe
Is anybody a blithering moron for saying we shouldnt upgrade our schedule after whats transpired the last 3 years in the SEC? Damn right they are
Last 10 years- SEC is tied for 5th in FF appearances- means its a lower-level conference

When you cant make the NCAA's fo sho when going .500 in conference with a winning OOC schedule, there's a problem

deny it all you want...nobody can prove me wrong here...nobody

 

[jackstefano]

Read that title line again ace.

 

[HD6]

who voted for Ron Polk, please reconsider. Flood 615dawg's inbox with a write in. There is no other choice for biggest douche. It's not even close.

 

[Coach34]

damn

 

[HD6]

the reason we were seeded low was because we lost non-conference games aGAINST non-elite competition, and then deciding the solution to getting a higher seed is to schedule even harder?

Of course, in the world where upsets and covering the spread equal the exact same thing, why should I expect less?

 

[jackstefano]

Even if you spell "scheduling" correctly.

 

[Coach34]

wtf you idiot? Its like dealing with Blew...you make no sense

 

[Coach34]

you cant prove my post wrong- its impossible...throw any ******** you want

 

[Optimus Prime 4]

[No message]

 

[HD6]

I can't disprove those were our seeds? Well no ****. But the idea that scheduling harder when we have not been able to win all of our non-conference games against a weaker slate will somehow improve our seeding is unbelievably stupid, or about par for the course from you.

It wasn't our 12-4 SEC record that got us an 8 seed two years ago, it was going 9-5 non-conference. And now you'd take away from the 9 wins by sending us to North Carolina and Kansas so we "can get our name out there." As what, a have game will travel whipping boy?

Is there a gun in your house? Load it, put it in your mouth, and pull the trigger.

 

[Todd4State]

That is all.

 

[Coach34]

where in the hell does "for" belong in "my last post on scheduling awhile"?

As my main Surgeon says about morons like you- "I dont understand how people are really that stupid...<redacted>, can you explain it to me? Are there people out there that dont brush their teeth everyday? How does somebody bust your chin and you don't go to the hospital for 2 weeks? How do you eat? I dont understand?"

 

[Afro Dawg]

I mean. Damn.

 

[Optimus Prime 4]

It goes "my last post on scheduling FOR awhile" or maybe "in awhile" though that wouldn't be true. Otherwise it doesn't make sense and is grammatically incorrect.

 

[HD6]

he replied to my reply, so it's not only grammatically incorrect, it's an outright lie.

 

[Optimus Prime 4]

but to be fair I missed that at first too.

 

[Coach34]

"my last post on scheduling awhile" is completely correct verbage. Altho, I will not argue "awhile" vs "a while"- i could be wrong on that....

The funniest part is that you homos are arguing about grammar instead of what is important- the fact that a stronger OOC is imperative for our basketball team</p>

 

[Afro Dawg]

The car is already completely totaled, yet he keeps climbing into the driver's seat and running into the tree over and over again.

Until this night I thought you were just a douchebag with a douchebag's agenda. I did not know you were borderline retarded.

 

[HD6]

we've already established how wrong you are there, and we've moved on. And you don't answer the sports related posts, because you know that you are wrong and you are continuing on this track of idiocy because you know it upsets people, and that's what you live for. You just say "You can't prove me wrong", even though I constantly do.

DS, I will do whatever you ask of me if you will ban this clown. There is no money I will not spend, no favor I will not grant, no embarrassment I will not suffer. Name your price.

 

[ScoobaDawg]

The numbers....

 

[Coach34]

we've already established how wrong you are there, and we've moved on. And you don't answer the sports related posts, because you know that you are wrong and you are continuing on this track of idiocy because you know it upsets people, and that's what you live for. You just say "You can't prove me wrong", even though I constantly do.

DS, I will do whatever you ask of me if you will ban this clown. There is no money I will not spend, no favor I will not grant, no embarrassment I will not suffer. Name your price.

uhhhh, no Bill Clinton. You can say it a thousand times, but it still is wrong. What part of my first post in this thread is wrong from an athletic standpoint?

 

[MSUCostanza]

You were a teacher, yet have very little grasp of the English language.

You were a coach, yet have very little useful sports knowledge.

Fascinating.

 

[DesotoCountyDawg]

[No message]

 

[HD6]

or something like that.

It's wrong because all 3 of those years, it was our non-conference losses, not conference losses that truly hurt us as far as seeding or making the tourney. If we hadn't played Clemson, Mizzou, and Winthrop in 2006, and had played three sub 100 teams, we'd have been 21-10 on Selection Sunday instead of 18-13, and probably gotten in. We were on the bubble, there can be zero doubt three more wins would have had us in. In 2007, if we had played three sub 100 teams rather than Clemson, Miami, and Southern Illinois, we are 25-7 on Selection Sunday instead of 22-10. That's more wins than 3 of the 4 five seeds and 2 of the 4 four seeds. So you saying we should schedule even harder in the non-conference to improve our seeding is ridiculous and stupid. We should get as many patsies as we can, and then take care of our business in the conference. Nobody gave a **** in 2004 we played a weak non-conference, they just saw that we were 25-3 going into the tournament. 2 seed.

 

[HD6]

what with the three countries of North America.

 

[Ol Blue.sixpack]

Because if he really thinks 5th out of 32 makes you a "lower level" conference, they sure as hell weren't going to put him in the Math department.

 

[Stormrider81]

other than how to act like an idiot on a message board and tell a MSU fan off on the same day his child is born?

 

[IBleedMaroonDawg]

Then you will post this **** again based on a 3 year time span. Hell, you can make the case for anything when you base it on a such small parameters. But I regress...

You're right...no on can prove you wrong, mostly because most of us have moved on past this pointless argument and are enjoying our summer as best we can.

If it was such an open and shut case then you wouldn't have to argue it so hard now would you Coach?

 

[Coach34]

8 conferences have made the FF in the last 10 years...we are TIED for 5th place at 4 appearances...so, being 5th or 6th out of 8 conferences does mean "lower level"

idiot

 

[bonedaddy401]

Coach you continue to make yourself look like a complete and total idiot every time you bring this up. WE GET IT, WE GET IT, WE GET IT.

Get a grip on reality and destroy your computer. You should have stayed banned.</p>

 

[Henry Kissinger]

it's a question of whether losing to a top 30 rpi team would improve our rpi more than beating alcorn state. i have no idea what the answer is because i haven't looked into it, and i don't know how they calculate it.

you could also look at how many losses we have to 70-130 teams over the years and play with percentages to see whether it'd be advantageous to lose to them once every 6 games or so instead of beating alcorn.

i really just don't care enough to figure it all out, but it's not like it'd be a hard thing to go do

 

[HD6]

for whatever reason, I do not know.

Men of SixPackSpeak.com, we must unite aGAINST this common enemy.

 

[jwbigcreek]

he is at least partially correct. When we got left out of the NCAAT in 99 (?, year we made the semis in the SEC-T & lost in OT), UAB got in with a similar record. One of the reasons (excuses), the selection committee gave was their 'quality opponents' such as Indiana. UAB got beat like a rented mule at IU (to the tune of about 40 pts). Seems like losses to quality teams (regardless how bad the loss is) seem to count for something.

Regardless, can I have my previous two votes on C34 back 615Dawg?

 

[BriantheDawg]

against the best/ proven coach we have on campus. His **** is it tired already. Been tired for a year or two already. Ban his ***. This **** is getting ridiculous. SPS will survive without the douche that is c34. As a matter of fact, he's one of the few problems wrong with this board. Just get rid of his *** and be done with it. Damn.

 

[jackstefano]

asdf

 

[Optimus Prime 4]

[No message]

 

[HD6]

if we hadn't played Florida State and Texas, and played two sub 100 teams and beaten them, we would have been 22-11 on Selection Sunday. Probably in.

 

[dawgstudent]

but the fact he didn't know "for" should be there even after being explained to him is still funny.