Name three specific areas UK has to improve to be successful

Levibooty

All-American
Jun 29, 2005
26,547
7,667
0
My list in order is:

1) OL play

2) QB decision making

3) Special teams defense


There are others such as developing go to WR, developing TE position, LB play, secondary pass coverage but my list is what I feel would have the greatest impact on our W-L record.
 

Mr Schwump

Heisman
Nov 4, 2006
29,563
23,097
18
Defense, offense and STs. But if you don't stop the run in the SEC you don't win.
 

John Henry

Hall of Famer
Aug 18, 2007
35,574
172,792
113
The entire Defense has to improve. I have been very disappointed in Stoops defense the past few years inasmuch as he has a solid defense pedigree.

Second is Special Teams. We may need to put all of our best players on special teams to make this happen.

Offensive Line.
 

80 Proof

Heisman
Jan 3, 2003
64,639
51,382
113
Offense
Defense
Special Teams


 

DACats86

All-Conference
Jan 7, 2003
22,776
4,134
0
80 hit the nail on the head, but if we are talking about specific (sub) units, I go with KapitalCat.
 

jnewc2_rivals30628

All-Conference
Nov 22, 2006
6,564
3,919
0
Run Defense (was one of worst units in nation)
Overall Special Teams (was one of worst units in nation)
Offensive line (was one of worst units in nation-36 sacks & bad run blocking)
 

K_TIME

Heisman
Jan 2, 2003
18,100
24,958
113
1. Far and away for me is defensive front 7 in the trenches. We were pretty brutal vs. the run last year. Lose our best 2 DL in Bud and Z (even though I think Z was overreated by UK fans). If we come back with same LB core, I don't see how we can hope to be any better overall as a defense in the front 7 is where we lost too many games last year. If Frios/Love/Hendrix, etc.. can't push Forrest to WLB and take a MLB spot..it will feel alot like Tiller/Quinn not being pushed out of their spots this past year.
- UGA game was a disaster up front,
- UT game was a disaster up front.
- LSU steam rolled us up front.
- UF looked like a solid showing but as season wore on...we saw UF have 2nd worst offense in SEC ahead of Vandy only.
- Miss St gashed us for easy points
- USCjr we got mashed up front just had a good offensive night and otuscored
2. QB decision making..>Towles has to see the field better period. Holding onto the ball, being in bad down/distances, etc. makes the OL look worse than they are. If he can't be quicker with the reads...then Barker hopefully can do the job.
3. OL on pass protection at the tackle spots is a bigger problem for me. But if it's going to be the same 4 OL along with Meadows in place of Miller....what is going to be massively different?
 
Feb 21, 2006
8,403
9,162
0
- Running...got to move the chains on the ground...need a couple of backs who can go North South and move the pile...

- Stopping the Run...got to get off the field on third down...got to stop mobile QBs

-Overall Defensive...development, fundamentals, game planning and execution as well as in game adjustments...the most frustrating part about a lot of our losses this season, is that we knew what the other teams were good at and what they were going to throw at us...yet we looked lost and incapable most of the time...
 

cat888

Senior
Jul 23, 2006
1,929
769
113
WE are recruiting depth as never before almost if not all 3 star players or above The most of these player need to stay the course and someday we replace the players that graduate or go pro with upper class players instead of true freshmen. The lack of this happening caused the downfall of Jokers reign
 

NavyCat88

All-Conference
Nov 22, 2011
3,739
4,598
0
O Line: Must protect the QB. QB improvement will follow as a direct result.
D Line: Must get some pass rush from DL and have reasonable success making tackles/stopping the run (freeing up the secondary to double hot receivers, take RBs on screens/slot receivers on slants, etc.
ST: Kick coverage, Kick returns....simple return to basic FB on ST would do wonders with this phase of the game.
 
Sep 13, 2003
23,905
33,655
0
- Pass coverage: We need to desperately find a lockdown Corner and cover RB's and TE's down the middle of the field
- Linebackers that can shed blocks and find the ball at the line of scrimmage instead of 3-4 yards downfield
- Stronger O-Line play, giving our QB time to make better reads in the pass and run games

Improvement in those 3 areas will give our team the opportunity to vastly increase our overall win total next season.
 

JW PRPcoach

All-Conference
Nov 20, 2006
1,639
1,536
98
IMO - if we focus on improving the offense - the defense will magically improve. In many of the games discussed above - we stopped the opponent two of their first three drives, only to go 3 and out or punt after 5 plays or less on offense.
 

Rhavic

Heisman
Dec 15, 2014
33,213
23,074
68
For me, it's O-line play, the defensive front 7, and the secondary.
Did we have a bad secondary? Nah, it was one of the more efficient pass defenses in the country, but I would like to see it be the most efficient pass defense in the country. With Mark Stoops at the helm, and him being a coach of the secondary, especially seeing the improvement made from last year to this year, I think this will be far and away the biggest improvement. Especially if we get recruits like Marcus Lewis.

The defensive front 7 struggled against the run for the biggest part of the season. I became confident in this group in the Louisville game. If Courtney Love gets to play immediately. I look for him to be a big part of our linebacking corps. He can take over the middle linebacker spot (The guy has massive size, and the speed to match outside linebackers), and I think Forrest would be an excellent outside linebacker. Even in the middle, he was able to catch most players on the edges of the field. He'll put on a little extra size as well, and he's the kind of linebacker who has the hands and now the defensive experience to be dangerous against tight ends in coverage. Firios seems to be excelling, and will finally know all of the plays. That's big for LB depth, I look for him to have a spot on the interior in the 3-4, and to provide good depth for the position overall. Stoops and co. have raved about him, and the scout team defense overall.
The d-line, despite losing Bud, should do fine. Bud is an excellent pass rusher, but he sounds very confident in Denzel's abilities, and Denzel has had an excellent red-shirt season learning from Bud, and performing on the scout team defense. I look for him to have an outstanding career. We're 100% set at the defensive tackle position, and I'm not at all worried there. We have very good DT's coming back with a lot of experience under their belt. Overall, I'm confident that our front 7 kicks it up a couple of notches this coming season, and overall, I believe we will have an excellent defensive year.

O-line play is the final big one. If the defense performs as I expect them to, the O-line will be the difference between 7 wins, or 9 wins before bowl season. I know Dawson's extremely up-tempo offensive philosophy should mask a few offensive issues, but this is too important to ignore. It improves too many thing. It will improves the YPC for our running backs (which was already good, and if we get Harris, I expect it to be better), it improves QB decision making. The QB can relax, scan the field, find the open receiver, or if he has a very big hole open, tuck it and run. It's the life blood of the offense, and if the O-line performs well, our defense can get a break, and perform better itself.

We have the pieces to have an extraordinary year next year, we have the staff, a proven defensive coach at the helm, an offensive coordinator who has a history with fast, explosive offenses, and if we get Harris, he will have a lot of good tools in our receiver depth, 2 outstanding backs in Boom and Damien, and two QB's who can give you two different looks in Towles and Barker. It's wide open, we're gonna have to fight hard next year, but Kentucky will have the ability to beat anybody on their schedule. Good play-calling, and players giving it 100% every time they're on the field will be big. I think next year will tell us, as fans, a lot about the new Kentucky football culture.
 

KYBallCoach

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2010
3,320
2
0
#1 Overall Defense

#2 QB accuracy (which I think will improve)

#3 Wide Receiver/TE play (we have to incorporate a TE in our offense)
 

Grumpyolddawg

Heisman
Jun 11, 2001
28,352
37,067
113
Originally posted by Brock28:
O line
D line
Linebacker
From watching UK's games, these are the areas that seemed to need the most work. QB play can't be judged when he is running for his health and neither can WR play. An elite RB can function a little with a weak OL, but he won't look elite. Williams is at the edge of being elite, with a little better blocking he might have crossed that line.

UK's run defense was bad, DL play was not good at all, they didn't penetrate with any consistency nor did they eat up blockers to keep LBs running free, they have to do one or the other. The defensive scheme determines what you want your DL to do. But much like the qb on offense, its probably unfair to judge LB play with poor DL play.
 

Levibooty

All-American
Jun 29, 2005
26,547
7,667
0
Consensus is we need to improve both lines which I agree with. That said Lewis, Johnson, and Elam will all have their first year of Div 1 football behind them next year so I think the DL will get better simply as a matter of experience.

The OL simply needs to learn their position and technique a lot more than they have shown. When you couple the OL with our QB play this past year production got steadily worse till season end. We simply need to keep the ball in our hands more as that will help with depth issues on defense.

And Grumphy we definitely need to quit giving you guys such a head-start on kickoffs!
 

TBCat

Heisman
Mar 30, 2007
14,317
10,331
0
Depends on what you mean by areas. If you mean positions then I will say OL, TE and LB. If going by "areas of improvement" I would list these items.

1. Getting a fast start. The team got off to terrible starts in almost all games. Even the games we won we didn't really show up until close to half time. You can't win in the SEC if you are training by 3 TDs in the first half. Just off the top of my head I can count the UT Martin and Vandy games as fast start games. All 10 others we didn't really get going until near half time. 2 good quarters of football just won't cut it. And when it's the start of the game you can't blame fatigue. Something else needs to change whether it's something in the pregame ritual or having a different game plan something has to change to get the team off to faster starts.

2. Go to players on offense. A successful offense usually needs 3 star players to really hit their peak. We clearly have the talent at QB and RB but we need for someone at each spot to step up and become the go to guy. WR we are a bit less prepared for but we still can produce a go to guy. My guess is Badet. As a freshmen he seemed like he could get open when he needed to. Bone and Baker have shown they can still catch the ball if not open. Someone at the position has to become the take charge guy though. Give UK a 1000 yard rusher, 1000 yard receiver and a QB with 25 or more TD passes and this team will easily go to a bowl. Might even flirt with 9 wins.

3. Defend the running game better. Stoops' defense has been tailored more toward versatility as a response against all of these spread offenses that are trendy. And I believe we did a good job against spread look teams. We are reasonable compared to our talent level against spread teams but we were awful against power sets. Especially against 2 TE and FB sets. We seemed to give up 9 or 10 yards at will against those teams. The USC game was the ultimate proof of that but it actually continued through out the year. During our early success we didn't see a single power team. Even Florida tried to run a lot of read option. Down the stretch most of the teams played power ball against us and destroyed us. The only 2 reasonable performances by are defense were against UL and Missouir which played a lot of spread Stoops needs to come up with some sort of answer for this even if it involves having an alternate defense that is designed special for power teams that he can switch to.
 

UKvisitor_rivals101449

All-American
Jan 3, 2007
18,099
8,602
0
Can't name three when one sticks out from here.

The LONG term conditioning of the athletes on the field was a big letdown this past year. It is no easy task to play against the big boys week after week. UK got beat down this year in the middle of the season.

UK getting resilient would be a big plus. THAT IS NOT EASY.
 

jauk11

Heisman
Dec 6, 2006
60,631
18,638
0
From above:

"3. OL on pass protection at the tackle spots is a bigger problem for me. But if it's going to be the same 4 OL along with Meadows in place of Miller....what is going to be massively different?"


1. The very important experience in the returning players, 4 of 5 starters.

2. The very important experience of working together with the same players as last year except for one.

3. The increased competition, with some new highly rated prospects with a very valuable reshirt year.

4. The undeniable increase in depth, should have a much better list of backups, ALL returning plus good new RS talent.

5. The definite possibility that one of these new guys will emerge as a real monster and replace one of our veterans.

6. The very real possibility that returing all of our QBs, RBs, and even most of our receivers will make the OL look a lot better even if they actually don't imporve------but they definitely should improve.
 

7ukncaa

Redshirt
Apr 30, 2003
2,520
8
0
All of the above are good. Maybe also . .

1. Depth and Conditioning. We basically ran out of gas after 6 or 7 games until we had a week off for UL. Maybe it is because we have a young team but I also wonder about this guy we are paying a ton of money to get the players in good shape. Seems like we are thin because we eat right but I don't notice us being in better shape or stronger than other teams we play.

2. QB play. We have to score points and keep the defense off the field. Maybe it is more O-line than QB but Towles seemed to miss some wide open receivers and he never ever went through progressions.

3. Starting games quickly. The 2nd half is always more important than the 1st half but we can't keep coming out of the gate flat. Hoping a new offensive mindset helps.
 

C1180

Sophomore
Dec 21, 2001
32,443
189
0
Originally posted by KapitalCat:
Oline
Secondary
Linebacker.

Posted from Rivals Mobile
This gets my vote. There is other areas that need to improve but these three areas must improve if UK is to be better next year. Overall run defense improvement would also be high on my list of areas that need improvement.
 

Deeeefense

Heisman
Staff member
Aug 22, 2001
43,969
50,650
113
The weakest positions are:

1. Both offensive tackles
2. Inside linebackers
3. Defensive tackle

There is need for improvement just about everywhere across the board but these spots need to step it up. Fortunately we have a a lot of young talent at these position that can potentially improve them.
 

UKfan2151

All-American
Oct 1, 2003
14,064
8,372
113
Originally posted by 7UKNCAA:
All of the above are good. Maybe also . .

1. Depth and Conditioning. We basically ran out of gas after 6 or 7 games until we had a week off for UL. Maybe it is because we have a young team but I also wonder about this guy we are paying a ton of money to get the players in good shape. Seems like we are thin because we eat right but I don't notice us being in better shape or stronger than other teams we play.
We ran out of gas simply because we don't have as many horses as our SEC brethren. Our starters were good enough initially to play well against quality opponents. But as the season wore on, those players wore out. We didn't have anyone in the 2nd or 3rd string that could come close to equaling their performance. But with each new recruiting class, that situation will improve dramatically.

The same thing happened back in 2007. The first half of that season we were a fantastic team that could play against anyone. We beat a highly ranked UL, beat a good Arkansas team on the road, beat #1 LSU at home and gave Florida a helluva run for their money too. But after those back to back grueling games against LSU and Florida, we just were never the same team again the rest of that season. And that is largely because that team also lacked depth. The first string could play with anyone. But by the time you got to the 2nd string, there was an immense drop-off in quality. That is where recruiting good players and recruiting to your needs is so critical. You have to have quality depth to compete in this conference. It is big boy football.
 

2bunnies

All-Conference
Apr 21, 2009
6,802
1,626
0
Special teams
OL
Offensive play calls. With our agile QB's, we should have more motion offense with 40/60 run/pass.
 

jimlowe7

Freshman
Nov 15, 2005
1,030
58
0
O-line
D-line
Special Teams

(so called "skill" positions will do enough if our FOUNDATION is strong!)
 

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,105
10,800
113
1- offensive line
2- offensive line
3- and this may come as a shock to some of you- offensive line.

More time for Towles means more accurate throws, less rolling out, more progressions, and basically opens the floodgates for play calling. Run? Sure! Pass? Hell, why not? Control tempo, control the clock, and you control most of the game. The defense will come along well in the next 2 years. That shot in the arm we got on offense with all our talent will be felt much the same on defense in the coming years as the guys come off of redshirt and get experience.

OLine, OLine, OLine.
 

Anon1668578572

Redshirt
Dec 14, 2005
682
10
18
Offensive & Defensive lines and ...
Coaching.
Can't give a complete pass to the coaching staff's game management
 

WeepNoMore

Junior
Jan 2, 2005
1,144
260
0
I'll name just one, but it affects all aspects of the game:

Fundamentals-

blocking (and not just the OL, the backs, especially, and receivers need to block effectively),
tackling across the board at every position and special teams, and
execution (receivers must run the right routes and catch the ball, RBs must hit the designated holes, defenders must shed blockers and hold on to relatively easy interceptions, etc.)!!!

Last year's team simply was not very sound fundamentally.



This post was edited on 1/7 2:15 AM by WeepNoMore
 

ukfantyler

Redshirt
Nov 30, 2014
14
0
0
1. scoring more points than their opponents
2. holding their opponents to scoring less than they do
3. having more points at the end of the game than their opponents do
 

Deeeefense

Heisman
Staff member
Aug 22, 2001
43,969
50,650
113
Originally posted by WeepNoMore:
I'll name just one, but it affects all aspects of the game:

Fundamentals-

blocking (and not just the OL, the backs, especially, and receivers need to block effectively),
tackling across the board at every position and special teams, and
execution (receivers must run the right routes and catch the ball, RBs must hit the designated holes, defenders must shed blockers and hold on to relatively easy interceptions, etc.)!!!

Last year's team simply was not very sound fundamentally.


This post was edited on 1/7 2:15 AM by WeepNoMore
that's a good perspective and indicative of a team using a lot of young inexperienced players.
 

balanced&blue

Redshirt
Mar 16, 2014
81
0
0
1. O line play

2. Stopping the run

3. Receivers must execute (catch it when it hits your hands & get open to create separation)

(*) If we did these things last year we go 7-5