Naz 6A next year?

mjw1

Redshirt
Jan 15, 2003
3
4
0
From the Jan 9th IHSA Board meeting:

ACTION ITEMS
1. The Board approved a recommendation to make changes to Board Policy 17 Classification System.

The first change is to the waiver process, which adds the language “1. Won a trophy” to the waiver process under the “Other Sports” heading.

The language was originally removed because it was believed that any team that won a trophy in the state meet would have qualified for the state final (the next condition listed). However, this is not true in track & field and now tennis, which are multi-class sports where qualification for the state meet is on an individual basis only.

The second change is to the Success Adjustment Policy.

The policy now reads (new language in BOLD):
A sport or activity program at a non-boundaried school shall be subject to the success adjustment if, over the course of the last four school terms, the program has won at least two trophies, one of which must have been within the last two school years. In such a case, one trophy won in the highest class will be disregarded, and the school will be moved up one class from the highest class of the remaining trophies. A school will never be adjusted up or down more than once class from one school year to the next.

Under the previous language, a non-boundaried school could, for example, win state titles in Class 2A and Class 3A in back-to-back years and not be subject to the Success Adjustment Policy, which was not the intention of the committee. Now, a school in that example would play in Class 3A the next season.

Executive Director Craig Anderson:
“These changes are both small tweaks, which is something we expected would occur over time as we evaluated the recent changes to these policies. Essentially, these were both instances that the committee had not considered when implementing, which contradict the intention of the waiver and success formula rules.”
 

downersdad

Redshirt
Jan 19, 2013
37
12
0
Prairie ridge will keep you from having to worry about trophies in 6a. Ah, but you never know.
 

JFelice

Senior
Sep 8, 2014
3,152
554
113
Naz won 6A and then went down a class to 5A the next year. But since it was their first state game, they still would go down to 5A in that second year.
This is the second year Naz would have been affected by success factor, 2016 would have been the first but that verbiage exempt Naz because they won in 2 different classes. Now that it's changed Naz is in fact bumped up to 6a, joining Montini and SHG in the IHSA's attempt to ensure a public school 5a champ.
 

godfthr53

All-Conference
Sep 8, 2008
4,964
2,778
113
Funny thing is it'll only work for 1 year when if neither make it thos year montini and naz are both back in 5a for 2018 and Naz is beyond stacked for 2018.
 

ClownBaby

Heisman
Oct 26, 2006
22,182
76,443
113
I don't think it much matters Peoria and PR are pretty much going to steam roll everyone in 5A and 6A next year.
 

LHSTigers94

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2004
3,173
2,437
93
This is the second year Naz would have been affected by success factor, 2016 would have been the first but that verbiage exempt Naz because they won in 2 different classes. Now that it's changed Naz is in fact bumped up to 6a, joining Montini and SHG in the IHSA's attempt to ensure a public school 5a champ.


Peoria, a public school and defending 5A champ, has a lot coming back so I'm not sure there is an attempt to gain anything. 5A had two public schools in the championship game last year.
 

Snetsrak61

Senior
Aug 16, 2008
1,209
681
113
This is the second year Naz would have been affected by success factor, 2016 would have been the first but that verbiage exempt Naz because they won in 2 different classes. Now that it's changed Naz is in fact bumped up to 6a, joining Montini and SHG in the IHSA's attempt to ensure a public school 5a champ.
No, I'm just trying to apply the rule retroactively. This doesnt prevent a future team from dropping down a class after winning a higher class (i.e. 2015 Naz) as long as they didnt have another recent state finals appearance.
 

TonPlugZeroLock

Sophomore
Nov 19, 2016
297
145
0
Rochester rule AND the Phillips rule?

Phillips getting all the transfers have found a loop hole. CPS open enrollment have made Phillips the destination of choice in Chicago. Same recruiting as Catholic schools it seems to me but no multiplier because of public tag.

And Rochester, strictly being left alone because of coaches last name and public school? HOW have they not been thrown up into 5a is beyond me. Being "overlooked".