Agreed, has to be some easy explanation out there.I’m really not understanding this. I mean, there are pretty clear NCAA rules against this.
Is the new gameplan to just take whoever you feel like putting on a college roster and then take the NCAA to court if they make a peep?
I think where we’re heading fast is unlimited eligibility for everyone.I’m really not understanding this. I mean, there are pretty clear NCAA rules against this.
Is the new gameplan to just take whoever you feel like putting on a college roster and then take the NCAA to court if they make a peep?
Pretty sure it’s referring to the guy being on a two way contractAgreed, has to be some easy explanation out there.
And WTF is a 2 way player? Aren’t all basketball players 2 way players?
Yes, and the NCAA, up to this point, always loses.I’m really not understanding this. I mean, there are pretty clear NCAA rules against this.
Is the new gameplan to just take whoever you feel like putting on a college roster and then take the NCAA to court if they make a peep?
A 2 way player plays on your G-League roster and can be called up and down like someone you call up from AAA in baseball. A 2 way can only play in 50 NBA games in a season.Agreed, has to be some easy explanation out there.
And WTF is a 2 way player? Aren’t all basketball players 2 way players?
I don’t think it ultimately gets that bad. Most of the overly negative take never happen. Similar to the super league breakaway. But I do wonder why it’s not being talked about. Last I checked Pavia wanted another year.I think where we’re heading fast is unlimited eligibility for everyone.
Yeah, been Chicken Littling this point for multiple years now because it is the only end result, if what has been happening, continues to happen.I think where we’re heading fast is unlimited eligibility for everyone.
Good. It wasn’t there when I linked it.Just pointing out that the linked Tweet as a "Community Note" that it's just clickbait and not real. (Not real for now...)