NBC,CNN,MSNBC are as bad as Goebbels's false propaganda in Nazi Germany*
- Thread starter BombadEER
- Start date
There is enough news out there that I think it is wise to view a lot and use logic to form ones own conclusion.
So if 495k are carrying appropriate signs and not dropping F bombs and 5k are the asshats you want to see, then that is what should be broadcast? I told you Fox yesterday afternoon was very complimentary of the DC rally but since that doesn't fit your agenda, you don't give a damn.
But Original, a simple question. Do you remember the Tea Party rallies? Far less than 5K were carrying ugly signs. What did the media show and focus on each night on tv? Those signs. They tried to paint the Tea Party as racist. Very, very different standard from what we saw yesterday.
There were racist signs in the crowd yesterday? Sexist? Revel flags? KKK references?
I don't mind what they actually showed, I'm amused at what they chose to leave out. Those chicks out there were demanding "respect" for their bodies and waving around some of the most lurid, disgusting descriptions of their genitals that anyone could call them. Not a peep from the media about any of that, they didn't even have the decency to give the gals some credit for their creativity by showing at least one of those signs!
No but there were signs like "My ***** is my right", and "keep your hands off my c*nt" and "this ***** has teeth" & "Trump's election gives me yeast infection" that NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, et-all never could find. They were all over the place though and WVU82 posted many of them for our pleasure to read.
So why do you suppose all of that was not shown? They couldn't find them?
The lack of memory of these wingnuts is amazing. And to have the nerve to actually attempt to say Tea Party and other right wing protests and declarations during Obama's years as something other than disgraceful is another instance of what that piece of **** called "alternative facts" this morning.
I don't know boom, the one media report I saw never did specify what they were protesting or what Trump had done that had them so upset?
They were all just out there against Trump. He hasn't even proposed any legislation yet for them to be upset with, so what WAS that? The media never did say...it was just a rally against Trump. All over the world too btw...even though we just had an American election.
I suppose if the Russians had a say in how we voted, why not let everyone else in too according to the media? They certainly did report on anti-Trump rallies around the world.
Interesting.
Last edited:
So it is bad to have signs denigrating people of a certain race or sexual preference. But it is ok to have signs vilifying conservatives and demonstrating hatred for people that don't think like them? I call that hypocrisy.
Boom, how do you know who carried those signs? We already know many protestors are hired guns? We know many "racist statements and fights" were fabricated. You have no idea the ideology of any person carrying a sign like that.
Maybe you KNOW, I don't. And signs that vilified President Trump are not hypocrisy. What signs vilified conservatives?
Many of them admitted they were paid agitators. Project Veritas confirmed how they were recruited and organized.
That is just it, you don't know yet you made an accusation. It has been proven that many protestors were hired. They carried hateful signs hoping the media would blame Trump and conservatives. It worked, until some were caught. Maybe you did not see my link in a prior post regarding a paid protestor written by the LA Times. There are many such articles on the net.
The signs hating on conservatives are all over the internet. Not tough to find.
It is fine to disagree with people based on their political ideology and even make signs to point out the disagreement.
No, it's not fine to attack someone based on race, gender, sexual preference, etc. We shouldn't even have to explain this. That is not hypocrisy.
I vehemently disagree with atl. We are diametrically opposed to each other on practically every issue. If I were to attack him based on race, that would be wrong and despicable.
I agree. But to viciously denigrate someone based on ideology is just as bad. To abhor someone based on their religion is just as bad. Hate is hate. Violence during these demonstrations as practiced mainly by liberals is extremely bad. Riots, property destruction, looting, a shooting just yesterday at the University of Washington with accompanying violence just to stop a man from speaking.
Well to be fair, they didn't damage businesses and start fires. But to your point, there were protests...lots of them including the disgraceful birther BS co-sponsored by Premier Trump.
just yesterday, the lying media changed the "pro-woman march" into an "anti-Trump parade" when they saw the size of the march...
How could you NOT see this ?
How could you NOT see this ?
It's a kunspeerusee I tell ya. That manestreem meediuh is out to get him. Bunch a liers.
For many it was anti-trump. I know one female relative (teacher) who went to protest the nomination of Devos. Another went for women's rights. I wasn't there. In my opinion, protesting a loss is not very productive right now. If he sucks as President, make sure he hears the message in 2018.
Really sad that any group hires protesters.......BLM protested in Richmond and of the people arrested for blocking interstate 95, I think all but one were from out of state. It surely wasn't a locally organized rally.
If you remember the Ferguson riots, many of the residents complained that the protesters and rioters were not from Ferguson. Why would Ferguson protesters destroyed their own businesses.
Same thing happened in Watts and LA. Frustration and anger manifests in ugly ways some times, doesn't mean it's hired guns.
You have. You said I was "voting against my own interests" when you were all perplexed as to why I voted for Trump?
You never even had the decency to explain what you meant by that? All you've ever said about it is "Trump's a racist". You've never even qualified that remark except to say "he refused to rent to Blacks" which is also patently false. (and not the definition of a 'racist')
All you have to do is Google and you'll find so many articles about people being hired by the Democrats to protest at Trump rally's. It is easy to find and has already been verified.
Hahahahahaha ha!
We already covered this. It was a liberal, trolling conservatives.
Conservatives are so gullible. They believe whatever they want to believe.
"Alternative facts".
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/17/ads-two-dozen-cities-offer-protesters-2500-agitate/
I have already posted articles from the LA Times proving the this fact. Are you claiming the LA Times is conservative, LOL
An audience of 30.6 million people tuned in to watch Donald Trump's inauguration as president, falling short of the number of people who watched Barack Obama's first swearing in eight years ago, according to Nielsen.21 hours ago.
Last edited:
I trust them one hell of a lot more than the hard news coverage at any other network. Their opinion journalist are clearly conservative. The reason, their main news anchors Chris Wallace and Shepard Smith are both liberals on a admittedly conservative station. All the other networks have liberal anchors reporting at liberal stations.
You are right, but correct me if I am wrong, but there was all of this hullabaloo when POTUS made his now famous audio tape of grab them by the - - - - -. The left side was aghast and the right side tried to douse the flames. Thing have just changed sides of the bed. It is totally laughable/frightening to watch both sides of the aisle fight over this crap. One upmanship is not conducive to remedying this Nation's problems.
Yes correct. I've even posted how amusing it is the Left is so upset over something Trump said in a supposedly private conversation, and they were practically cheering what Clinton actually did to that 18 year old intern in the White House, among other equally vulnerable women. All they said back then is who cares, it's only about sex?
It's OK to be upset over vulgar and disgusting behavior. Not even Trump supporters thought what he said about Women was OK...but they were not willing to give the Left any moral high ground on this, especially after the Clinton years. It was just time for pay back, and that's why a lot of us on the right stood by Trump.
So, it was o.k. to speak up/out because it was to repay a similar act by the opposition?
Last edited: