I truly don't understand how Davino didn't get number 1 seed. Wrestled a full schedule including National duals and Big 10. Redeemed his only loss to the Number 1 ranked guy in country. I don't see where Forrest resume is near Davino's. Please explain
NCAA seeding math should've went like this:
- H2H (25%): tied
- Quality Wins (20%): 15-5 for Davino, who beat more NQs and generally higher-ranked ones
- Coaches Rank (15%): 15-0 for Davino (3 vs 4)
- Conf Finish (10%): tied
- Common Opponents (10%): tied
- Win % (10%): Forrest 10-0
- RPI (10%): Davino 10-0
--> Davino +25
BUT: revised Coaches Rank was not made public after conference tourneys. Forrest would've gotten the 1 if he were higher ranked.
ALSO: if the Coaches Poll weren't re-done, then Blaze also beats Forrest +15. (Only change to above is Conf Finish 10-0 to Forrest.)
AND: Blaze vs Seidel is in the same bucket. Blaze wins based on public data, but Seidel wins if ranked higher and his newly acquired RPI were higher.
So just like B10 seeding, lack of transparency is the issue.
If those 4 really were more or less tied with each other, then Davino got additionally hosed by the ISU 133 situation. He beat Frost in the dual. Forrest beat then-backup Grice in the dual.