Toggle sidebar

NCAA smacks Don Jackson....

M

msudogsrule01

New member
Mar 3, 2008
702
0
0
<span class="status-body"><span class="entry-content">Not surprised.
http://bit.ly/bPcmjx
</span></span><p style="padding-left: 30px;">"Mr. Jackson is wrong in his
description of Renardo Sidney, Jr’s., initial-eligibility status, and he
continues to demonstrate a lack of understanding of the Amateurism
Certification Process. The <span class="caps">NCAA</span> Division I
Amateurism Fact-Finding Committee has only determined what facts will
now be analyzed to decide if violations of <span class="caps">NCAA</span>
legislation have occurred, and if so, what penalties should be
assessed.</p><p style="padding-left: 30px;">“This matter will
not be concluded until such final determinations have been made. At this
point, it is premature to speculate on a timeframe and an ultimate
outcome. However, it is correct to say had Mr. Jackson promptly and
accurately replied in full to the <span class="caps">NCAA</span>’s
repeated requests for specific information beginning in April 2009 the
process would be much further along.”</p>
 
D

dawgatUSM

Member
Apr 6, 2008
3,820
2
38
But really NCAA? What else do you want? You've gotten things that only asubpoena would get you, yet you're still saying you don't have enough information. I just don't get it.
 
8

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
13,355
4,790
113
I think they are saying that if he had responded faster over the course of this, it would have been resolved faster.

They are deflecting the blame of the non-determination on him.
 
T

TheBigBadDawg

New member
Jan 27, 2009
427
0
0
The <span class="caps">NCAA</span> Division I Amateurism Fact-Finding Committee has only determined what facts will now be analyzed to decide if violations of <span class="caps">NCAA</span> legislation have occurred, and if so, what penalties should be assessed.
Click to expand...
They just haven't done anything with it (read it, looked at it, analyzed it, etc). That's awhole new process, guaranteed to take another lifetime to sort out.
 
ckDOG

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
9,268
4,422
113
The NCAA makes the federal government look like a fine-tuned and well-oiled machine.
At this
point, it is premature to speculate on a timeframe and an ultimate
outcome.
Click to expand...
That quote infuriates me. Basically, they are saying, "we'll get around to it when we get to it". Assuming we aren't going to challenge the statement of facts, they have the ability to make a quick turn around on this if they wanted to. There's no reason for it to be another drawn out process.
 
M

Mstate11

New member
Oct 25, 2008
134
0
0
msudogsrule01 wrote:
However, it is correct to say had Mr. Jackson promptly and accurately replied in full to the <span class="caps">NCAA</span>’s repeated requests for specific information beginning in April 2009 the process would be much further along.”
Click to expand...
After Jackon bashedTheNinja and company a couple of weeks ago for being too slow and not replying soon enough for the NCAA tomake a ruling....look who was the one holding out.

Sourgrapes Mr.Jackson?
 
T

TheBigBadDawg

New member
Jan 27, 2009
427
0
0
Other than the fact that the only rules are the ones they make, and they can do whatever they want. Somebody said it a few months ago - this was the case the NCAA decided (quite arbitrarily it seems) they were going to make their big one for the year. Jackson comes along and antagonizes everyone involved, and now they get to sit on it for as long as they want.

It really seriously pisses me off, but there's absolutely nothing anyone can do.
 
M

MrHooch

New member
Feb 25, 2008
1,284
0
0
8Dog said:
I think they are saying that if he had responded faster over the course of this, it would have been resolved faster.

They are deflecting the blame of the non-determination on him.
Click to expand...
you can't rush perfection, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom