Negative, but seems to be the case.

frost1

All-Conference
Dec 21, 2001
11,110
3,210
0
I know the big uglies on the defensive line, are hard to get the high rated guys. so, we have to settle on the 2& low 3* star guys. some will produce in a a couple of years & some will not. Stoops, JMOP Has failed in this area.not enough linemen brought in. sure we have had some bad luck with a few players leaving. I sure support Stoops & Staff, so just hope he brings in more linemen. A must have to win.
 

dustarm20

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2003
4,131
2,368
113
Not enough depth but we have had guys leave the program for various reasons? Seems like we would have had enough depth if not for some off-the-field issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JC CATS

KapitalCat

Heisman
May 21, 2002
84,693
57,157
102
It's a combination of a lot things. It's the hardest position to recruit, there are fewer big uglies for the D-line and the elite programs seem to get the lions share. Add a motivated Hatcher and Reggie Meant to this roster and it's a totally different deal. Losing Hatcher, Meant and Tubman just put them behind the 8 ball. I realize those are excuses and it's up to the staff to overcome players leaving but the reality is, it's an issue with this years team.

We overcome with some smoke and mirrors and hoping the offense goes from one of the worst teams in the country making first downs to something at least in the middle. For every additional first down, that's the potential of 4 plays D-line isn't getting exposed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

gamalielkid

All-American
Mar 21, 2002
6,079
6,600
113
I know the big uglies on the defensive line, are hard to get the high rated guys. so, we have to settle on the 2& low 3* star guys. some will produce in a a couple of years & some will not. Stoops, JMOP Has failed in this area.not enough linemen brought in. sure we have had some bad luck with a few players leaving. I sure support Stoops & Staff, so just hope he brings in more linemen. A must have to win.

Heck we might as well just not play. We only 85 players on our roster - and apparently none of them are worthy of a college scholarship - at least on the defensive line. Too many years of negativism around here. A group not any better than this almost won 9 games last year. So, obviously this team is awful.

UL is ranked in the top 20. We should have beaten them - but we didn't. So, they get a top 20 ranking and we are no were to be found.

Things might change this year.

Go Big Blue!
 
  • Like
Reactions: dorkmeister

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,139
10,924
113
Tubman, Meant, and Hatcher are pretty big arguments for giving the coaches a bit of leniency.

JMO.

Tell the staff that they have to drop three players in the secondary. One experienced veteran, one underclassmen who's shown promise, and a guy who projects as a great player when he gets experience.

Let's say that means we lose McWilson, Westry, and Griffin. Looks pretty bad, right? Now couple that with the knowledge that defensive backs are many magnitudes easier to recruit....
 

lex cath

Heisman
Jan 6, 2016
7,782
12,104
0
Heck we might as well just not play. We only 85 players on our roster - and apparently none of them are worthy of a college scholarship - at least on the defensive line. Too many years of negativism around here. A group not any better than this almost won 9 games last year. So, obviously this team is awful.

UL is ranked in the top 20. We should have beaten them - but we didn't. So, they get a top 20 ranking and we are no were to be found.

Things might change this year.

Go Big Blue!

You forgot WKU also got votes as well
 

tntuk

Heisman
Jan 17, 2002
11,521
11,029
113
Tubman, Meant, and Hatcher are pretty big arguments for giving the coaches a bit of leniency.

JMO.

Tell the staff that they have to drop three players in the secondary. One experienced veteran, one underclassmen who's shown promise, and a guy who projects as a great player when he gets experience.

Let's say that means we lose McWilson, Westry, and Griffin. Looks pretty bad, right? Now couple that with the knowledge that defensive backs are many magnitudes easier to recruit....
And don't forget the loss of Kobe Smith and Hamilton (who flipped to OSU) as recruits. Stowbridge as well.
 

merrimanm

Heisman
Dec 14, 2009
17,798
30,534
113
Most of us are in the dark. Can you shed some light on the issue. Why is Meant gone?
I don't know any more than anyone else. But to just assume that it is the coaches fault for their issues is ridiculous. Noone knows what happened to Meant. But it appears that most of both player's issues began before coming to UK.

Everyone blames the coach for everything. That is just ridiculous and lack of knowledge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Henry

2330859

All-American
Nov 28, 2002
12,145
9,804
0
I agree Merrimann; the UK staff had nothing to do with either of these three kids leaving. Every team in America goes through this. In this culture it is amazing it is not a larger issue than it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: merrimanm

dorkmeister

Junior
Oct 25, 2006
6,668
396
0
The fact is, we have who we have. Coaches have recruited for 4 years and Stoops has his team. If we have issues then Stoops needs to figure out how to fix them. All schools have kids leave or get hurt. He has his team.

Pad up and line up. If we can't win at least 6 games, with how down the SEC is this year, then coach needs to take the questions and answer.

At this point he has his team. Line up and play. No excuses. No reason!!!
 
Dec 28, 2014
7,620
14,730
0
So how many years should the fans give stoops to fix the defense? Headed into year 4 and we have major concerns about depth up front. How long should we be prepared to wait?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BARRYBLUE1

John Henry

Hall of Famer
Aug 18, 2007
35,575
172,802
113
It had nothing to do with "discipline" - it was a serious family issue.

Thank you, I wish the young man only the best because family issues can often be the worst kind of problem. My prayers are with him and I wish only the best for his family and his future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: railroadkat_1

kyrivals

Sophomore
Jul 27, 2016
131
153
0
Problems on the DL are a combination of poor recruiting, bad luck on and off the field. Factor in some questionable player development and there you go. Coaches know it's the biggest weakness in the program. You can't red shirt kids because we have no depth. At this point I think you hit the juco's hard if you can't get quality players from high school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thepip

Shydog

Heisman
Sep 11, 2013
6,764
10,828
113
Heck we might as well just not play. We only 85 players on our roster - and apparently none of them are worthy of a college scholarship - at least on the defensive line. Too many years of negativism around here. A group not any better than this almost won 9 games last year. So, obviously this team is awful.

UL is ranked in the top 20. We should have beaten them - but we didn't. So, they get a top 20 ranking and we are no were to be found.

Things might change this year.

Go Big Blue!
sorry but we didn't "almost win nine games" last year, my goodness! If you are saying b/c we were competitive in 9 that means we almost won 9 well ok but not the way I look at it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: CHAMPCAT11

warrior-cat

Hall of Famer
Oct 22, 2004
190,856
152,033
113
sorry but we didn't "almost win nine games" last year, my goodness! If you are saying b/c we were competitive in 9 that means we almost won 9 well ok but not the way I look at it!
I was thinking the same thing.
 

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
It's a combination of a lot things. It's the hardest position to recruit, there are fewer big uglies for the D-line and the elite programs seem to get the lions share. Add a motivated Hatcher and Reggie Meant to this roster and it's a totally different deal. Losing Hatcher, Meant and Tubman just put them behind the 8 ball. I realize those are excuses and it's up to the staff to overcome players leaving but the reality is, it's an issue with this years team.

We overcome with some smoke and mirrors and hoping the offense goes from one of the worst teams in the country making first downs to something at least in the middle. For every additional first down, that's the potential of 4 plays D-line isn't getting exposed.
You also forgot a screwed Lloyd Tubmam
 

GoCatsForever2k15

All-Conference
Jun 7, 2015
3,082
1,895
0
A recruits change of heart happens, and you can't blame the staff for that.... especially when they flip to OSU.

A key player having a freak family emergency that causes him to have to quit football is a much better reason to "go easy" on the staff than the staffs inability to land certain prospects.
 

tntuk

Heisman
Jan 17, 2002
11,521
11,029
113
A key player having a freak family emergency that causes him to have to quit football is a much better reason to "go easy" on the staff than the staffs inability to land certain prospects.
Don't disagree with that at all. I'm just saying that in addition to the players mentioned in this thread, there were others (recruits) who never made it here....those players would have helped the DL. That's all I'm saying....
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoCatsForever2k15

RV

Heisman
Jun 26, 2005
8,089
13,585
0
Notwithstanding the flips of some commits, do you really consider signing 16 kids for three down positions in 4 years a failure?

Melvin Lewis, Jacob Hyde, Regie Meant, Alvonte Bell, ZaDarius Smith, Adrian Middleton Cory Johnson, Matt Elam, Tymere Dubose, Javon Provitt, Courtney Miggins, Kengera Daniel, Cordell Looney, JaQuize Cross, Naquez Pringle, TJ Carter
 
  • Like
Reactions: merrimanm

Pike 96

All-Conference
Jun 7, 2010
3,162
4,344
0
So how many years should the fans give stoops to fix the defense? Headed into year 4 and we have major concerns about depth up front. How long should we be prepared to wait?

So other than 2007 and 2008...when we happened to have a number of NFL defensive players step up, name me a time when UK had a legit SEC defense???

The question is assuming Stoops isn't providing something that is STANDARD at UK....a legit SEC defense. And it just isnt. Not since the 70s have we had a legitimately "fixed" defense. We have more talent from top to bottom on the defense then at anytime in the last 3 decades. So give the 4 year crap a rest. Stoops seriously deserves until his first FULL recruiting class are redshirt seniors for us to really expect a good defense.

That would be the guys in the 2014 class as redshirt seniors and true seniors and RS juniors from 2015 and. That would be Dubose, Middleton, Ware, K Walker, Laster, Edwards, Bonner, Firios as RS seniors. With Jones, E Brown, Baity, Griffin, Looney, Daniel, as Seniors a D Juniors. When those guys are upper class men and we fill in with others, you should expect our D to be legit across the SEC.

That's how it's done in football. Period
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beatle Bum and RV

Cats_2010

Heisman
Jan 8, 2010
11,173
18,677
103
sorry but we didn't "almost win nine games" last year, my goodness! If you are saying b/c we were competitive in 9 that means we almost won 9 well ok but not the way I look at it!

We came a heck of a lot closer to losing 9 games last year than winning 9.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CHAMPCAT11

tntuk

Heisman
Jan 17, 2002
11,521
11,029
113
Notwithstanding the flips of some commits, do you really consider signing 16 kids for three down positions in 4 years a failure?

Melvin Lewis, Jacob Hyde, Regie Meant, Alvonte Bell, ZaDarius Smith, Adrian Middleton Cory Johnson, Matt Elam, Tymere Dubose, Javon Provitt, Courtney Miggins, Kengera Daniel, Cordell Looney, JaQuize Cross, Naquez Pringle, TJ Carter
Not sure who you are responding to, but to answer your question....No.

I'm in the camp that thinks our DL will be serviceable....and not pining for those who are no longer here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JPFisher and RV

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,899
60,268
113
A recruits change of heart happens, and you can't blame the staff for that.... especially when they flip to OSU.

I think Allen, King and Westry last year and Carter this year should keep us from lamenting the loss of kids who did not want to be here.
 

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,139
10,924
113
So how many years should the fans give stoops to fix the defense? Headed into year 4 and we have major concerns about depth up front. How long should we be prepared to wait?

As long as it takes the coaches to field a defense with depth that isn't higher than a kite or kicked away because of a circus court.

Offense and special teams took a step back last year. Depth appears to be an issue, but we won't know how much of one until we play a few games.

Some board peeps are acting like there's no hope for more than a single win. There's more at play here and it's a team sport. Stoops needs to focus on winning six. If that means winning them with solid performances on offense, then I'm cool with defense lacking. Just get six.
 

BlueRaider22

All-American
Sep 24, 2003
15,562
9,058
0
So how many years should the fans give stoops to fix the defense? Headed into year 4 and we have major concerns about depth up front. How long should we be prepared to wait?

First, you have to understand where we were so that you can appreciate where we are. 3-4 yrs ago we had no talent nor depth hardly anywhere on the team. Right now it's mainly DL and OT.

Second, you have to understand what must be done. It is not imperative that we win 10 games this yr......though it would be fantastic wouldn't it? It is imperative that we win 6-7 and go a bowl game. It is imperative that we show improvement. It is imperative that we maintain momentum.....on field, with fans, with recruiting, with media, etc. We don't need to be 57 deep on the DL to accomplish that. Heck, we almost accomplished 6-7 wins last yr with more concerns across the board than this coming yr.

Third, we are not Bama. There are just a few programs in the nation who recruit well enough where depth isn't an issue yr in yr out. Even if Stoops gets us to the point where we are winning 9-10 wins per yr on average we will still run into depth concerns at times among position groups.

You can get by if the rest of the team can make up for lack of depth. We have a good feeling that the secondary is going to be decent. The LBers sound like they are going to be decent. And the offense should be much improved from last yr.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RV and shutzhund

jauk11

Heisman
Dec 6, 2006
60,631
18,638
0
First, you have to understand where we were so that you can appreciate where we are. 3-4 yrs ago we had no talent nor depth hardly anywhere on the team. Right now it's mainly DL and OT.

Second, you have to understand what must be done. It is not imperative that we win 10 games this yr......though it would be fantastic wouldn't it? It is imperative that we win 6-7 and go a bowl game. It is imperative that we show improvement. It is imperative that we maintain momentum.....on field, with fans, with recruiting, with media, etc. We don't need to be 57 deep on the DL to accomplish that. Heck, we almost accomplished 6-7 wins last yr with more concerns across the board than this coming yr.

Third, we are not Bama. There are just a few programs in the nation who recruit well enough where depth isn't an issue yr in yr out. Even if Stoops gets us to the point where we are winning 9-10 wins per yr on average we will still run into depth concerns at times among position groups.

You can get by if the rest of the team can make up for lack of depth. We have a good feeling that the secondary is going to be decent. The LBers sound like they are going to be decent. And the offense should be much improved from last yr.

I wonder how many of the fans on here so worried about our depth can name one 2nd string player on the 07 team?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueRaider22

ScrewDuke1

Hall of Famer
Jul 29, 2016
41,045
152,514
113
Notwithstanding the flips of some commits, do you really consider signing 16 kids for three down positions in 4 years a failure?

Melvin Lewis, Jacob Hyde, Regie Meant, Alvonte Bell, ZaDarius Smith, Adrian Middleton Cory Johnson, Matt Elam, Tymere Dubose, Javon Provitt, Courtney Miggins, Kengera Daniel, Cordell Looney, JaQuize Cross, Naquez Pringle, TJ Carter
Not developing almost all of them is a failure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeepNoMore

jnewc2_rivals30628

All-Conference
Nov 22, 2006
6,564
3,919
0
I know the big uglies on the defensive line, are hard to get the high rated guys. so, we have to settle on the 2& low 3* star guys. some will produce in a a couple of years & some will not. Stoops, JMOP Has failed in this area.not enough linemen brought in. sure we have had some bad luck with a few players leaving. I sure support Stoops & Staff, so just hope he brings in more linemen. A must have to win.

He's not bringing in enough d-linemen, but when you're getting manhandled by Southern Miss and New Mexico State recruiting isn't the problem. Those schools have never and will never out-recruit us. That's coaching and player development
 

merrimanm

Heisman
Dec 14, 2009
17,798
30,534
113
He's not bringing in enough d-linemen, but when you're getting manhandled by Southern Miss and New Mexico State recruiting isn't the problem. Those schools have never and will never out-recruit us. That's coaching and player development
I agree with NMS, but that is not true about SMU.
 

jnewc2_rivals30628

All-Conference
Nov 22, 2006
6,564
3,919
0
I agree with NMS, but that is not true about SMU.

Even in their best year we should never get manhandled in the trenches by a C-USA team..especially if we expect to compete in the best conference in college football. Southern Miss was vastly undersized and had significantly less talent on both sides of the trenches and we got pushed around like a JV team. That's not recruiting or players, it's Mark Stoops, DJ Eliot and John Schlarman