New AG urging for Adams case to be "dismissed"?

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,639
1,608
113
That's gonna be an interesting spin.
Why? The Biden admin had close to 2 years to prosecute it. It’s almost as if they brought it to try and extort him, which, would be 100% on brand for everything they did.

NYC about to experience a cleanse.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
Why? The Biden admin had close to 2 years to prosecute it. It’s almost as if they brought it to try and extort him, which, would be 100% on brand for everything they did.

NYC about to experience a cleanse.
Blame Biden. The spin begins. :joy:

I thought we wanted to go after corruption and hold politicians accountable?
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
It seemed like Lawfare from Biden’s admin when I read about it back when it first happened.
You didn't answer. Why won't they NOW? Why were they given orders by the NEW AG office to dismiss?

It's NOT "lawfare". Another lame excuse and spin.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,639
1,608
113
You didn't answer. Why won't they NOW? Why were they given orders by the NEW AG office to dismiss?
Well, it it was lawfare before, then there is no reason to continue it. Part of the cleanse of the JD to prosecute crimes not people.
 

Airport

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2001
81,161
1,316
113
You didn't answer. Why won't they NOW? Why were they given orders by the NEW AG office to dismiss?

It's NOT "lawfare". Another lame excuse and spin.
He asked for more money from the Biden admin cause NYC didn’t have enough. The next thing, they indicted him. Now, I’m not sure what he did but considering NYC politics, he’s probably quilty of something. However, He announced he’s cooperating with Homan to a certain extent so maybe that was the reason they didn’t. If he helps in getting the taco eating squatters out of NYC it’s worth it.
 

SoCo

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
35,601
137
63
Blame Biden. The spin begins. :joy:

I thought we wanted to go after corruption and hold politicians accountable?
You never wanted that. I never once saw you wanting to hold the Biden crime family accountable. Why are you suddenly so concerned?
 

roadtrasheer

Junior
Sep 9, 2016
16,609
265
83
He asked for more money from the Biden admin cause NYC didn’t have enough. The next thing, they indicted him. Now, I’m not sure what he did but considering NYC politics, he’s probably quilty of something. However, He announced he’s cooperating with Homan to a certain extent so maybe that was the reason they didn’t. If he helps in getting the taco eating squatters out of NYC it’s worth it.
Didn't he get on the news and tell people the Biden administration needed to help one way or the other , give money or stop the flow and then he had charges brought on him .......I'll be a son-of-a-***** he stopped talking to the news and the charges was never pushed ....but held over his head .
Now Trump is playing him to help clean NYC up . ....big difference Biden was playing him to destroy NYC.
Truth be told he has done something illegal and he knows it . His term is up he going into the shadows.
 

Airport

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2001
81,161
1,316
113
Didn't he get on the news and tell people the Biden administration needed to help one way or the other , give money or stop the flow and then he had charges brought on him .......I'll be a son-of-a-***** he stopped talking to the news and the charges was never pushed ....but held over his head .
Now Trump is playing him to help clean NYC up . ....big difference Biden was playing him to destroy NYC.
Truth be told he has done something illegal and he knows it . His term is up he going into the shadows.
He did. It was auid pro quo.
 

Gunny46

Senior
Jul 2, 2018
50,241
565
113
Why? The Biden admin had close to 2 years to prosecute it. It’s almost as if they brought it to try and extort him, which, would be 100% on brand for everything they did.

NYC about to experience a cleanse.

Exactly this. They charged him to get him to stop complaining and play ball. Now they want to ***** about this. **** them.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
You never wanted that. I never once saw you wanting to hold the Biden crime family accountable. Why are you suddenly so concerned?
Go back. Do your research. I encouraged investigations. I have always said if someone commits a crime, hold them accountable. Nice spin attempt. Doesn’t work on me.
 

Gunny46

Senior
Jul 2, 2018
50,241
565
113
Go back. Do your research. I encouraged investigations. I have always said if someone commits a crime, hold them accountable. Nice spin attempt. Doesn’t work on me.

The DOJ did. They dropped the charges. NYC is now going to be cleaned up.
 

Gunny46

Senior
Jul 2, 2018
50,241
565
113
Texas and Louisiana AG need to sue and issue a Warrant for arrest.







Texas and Louisiana are moving forward with legal action against an abortion provider in New York who prescribed abortion medication through telemedicine.

On Thursday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul rejected Louisiana’s request to extradite Dr. Margaret Daley Carpenter, who late last month was indicted in Louisiana for prescribing abortion pills via telehealth to a minor patient in that state.

“I will not be signing an extradition order that came from the governor of Louisiana — not now, not ever,” Hochul said at a news conference, citing New York's shield laws, which are intended to protect physicians from criminal prosecution for providing abortion care to patients in states where it is banned.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
I mean, no. You really didn't. No reason for you to lie
Yep. You are too lazy (or stupid) to look. But it's there. Just searched myself. [thumbsup] (hint: it's below)

"Who said I wasn't against collecting data? Have at it. I've stayed steady on all this from day 1. If the government wants to investigate Trump, Biden, Hunter, Fauci........have at it. But we both know that whatever the findings, neither side will accept it."
 

Riverguideer

Redshirt
Aug 8, 2023
794
0
0
Yep. You are too lazy (or stupid) to look. But it's there. Just searched myself. [thumbsup] (hint: it's below)

"Who said I wasn't against collecting data? Have at it. I've stayed steady on all this from day 1. If the government wants to investigate Trump, Biden, Hunter, Fauci........have at it. But we both know that whatever the findings, neither side will accept it."

No it isn't. No reason to lie.
 

SoCo

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
35,601
137
63
Yep. You are too lazy (or stupid) to look. But it's there. Just searched myself. [thumbsup] (hint: it's below)

"Who said I wasn't against collecting data? Have at it. I've stayed steady on all this from day 1. If the government wants to investigate Trump, Biden, Hunter, Fauci........have at it. But we both know that whatever the findings, neither side will accept it."
That's not calling for an investigation. All you are saying is you are ok with investigations into Biden and Trump if they do them.

Not once have you demanded accountability from the Biden crime family. Petty partisanism is never a good look.
 

Airport

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2001
81,161
1,316
113
That's not calling for an investigation. All you are saying is you are ok with investigations into Biden and Trump if they do them.

Not once have you demanded accountability from the Biden crime family. Petty partisanism is never a good look.
death GIF
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
That's not calling for an investigation. All you are saying is you are ok with investigations into Biden and Trump if they do them.

Not once have you demanded accountability from the Biden crime family. Petty partisanism is never a good look.
Bullsh!t. That's funny. You guys, talking negative about "partisanism"?????? Pretty sure when I say I'm cool with investigations, then that means I'm ok with "investigations".

Cracks Me Up Steve Harvey GIF by ABC Network
 

SoCo

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
35,601
137
63
Bullsh!t. That's funny. You guys, talking negative about "partisanism"?????? Pretty sure when I say I'm cool with investigations, then that means I'm ok with "investigations".

Cracks Me Up Steve Harvey GIF by ABC Network
We all get it. You are indifferent to whether they investigate the Biden crime syndicate. You don't need to keep restating it.

Being indifferent to investigations, by definition, is not wanting to hold corrupt officials accountable. Like I said, you never advocated for holding Biden accountable.

Your partisanism is easy to identify and fun to ridicule.
 

Airport

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2001
81,161
1,316
113
We all get it. You are indifferent to whether they investigate the Biden crime syndicate. You don't need to keep restating it.

Being indifferent to investigations, by definition, is not wanting to hold corrupt officials accountable. Like I said, you never advocated for holding Biden accountable.

Your partisanism is easy to identify and fun to ridicule.
Need to hold everybody accountable.