Ninja Sr on Texas AM stance on CR and not going SEC

beachbumdawg

Senior
Nov 28, 2006
2,910
696
113
<span class="StoryHeadline">Let's Talk About Conference Realignment</span>

<span class="StoryTeaser"><blank></blank></span></p><div id="storyNav"></div>

</p><table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="155" align="right"><tbody><tr><td width="5">
</td><td width="150" align="middle"><img alt="<div align="center">Bill Byrne
Director of Athletics
</div>" src="http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/tam/sports/genrel/auto_action/2254003.jpeg">

<span class="StoryCaption"><div align=""center"">Bill Byrne
Director of Athletics
</div></span></td></tr></tbody></table><div id="Content">

June 16, 2010</p>

</p>

To paraphrase Jimmy Johnson - How `bout them Aggies! Back-to-back, to back-to-back national championships in men's and women's track and field.What an accomplishment.Never in the history of Texas A&M have we had such success, and I am so proud of our athletes, coaches and staff.</p>

Nationally, we are getting some recognition for our success as well. Unless I can't add right, we will finish in the top 10 of the Learfield Sports Directors' Cup standings for the first time ever in Aggie history. This is also an incredible accomplishment for all our athletes, coaches and staff. We are definitely going in the right direction and Building Champions.</p>

***</p>

Let's talk about conference realignment.We have said from day one our goal was to stay in the Big 12, and we are doing that minus two. We were asked to provide conference realignment options for our University leadership to consider, and we did. With all the information available, I believe they made the right decision.</p>

I hope you'll remember as discussions of conference realignment began to surface, I said someone has to stand up for the student-athletes. It is my sincere belief that staying in the Big 12, where we compete in the same time zone, get our athletes home from competition at a decent hour, and where they can play in front of their families and friends, are all very important things to consider. Our athletes and coaches have skin in the realignment game, and all our coaches and the vast majority of our student-athletes want to stay where we are. That was a key decision point to me.</p>

Now, I've heard from many, many of you who do not agree with the decision that was made. I understand that. Every choice we had contained pluses and minuses, and arguments can be made for and against each decision. Obviously I cannot respond to each and every one of you individually, so here is a response to the various compiled questions and arguments many of you have made:</p>

Statement One: Texas is going to have a cable channel like the Big Ten Network that will give them even more money and recruiting advantages. After all, it was reported in orangebloods.com and many media outlets picked it up, so it must be true. </p>
Here are the facts. The bottom line is NOTHING HAS CHANGED! They could have had their own network for the last 14 years of the Big 12 and so could we or any member of the conference. Our friends have been bringing their Longhorn Sports Network television mic flags around for years. Their stand alone network has still not happened yet.

</p>

ABC/ESPN and FOX continue to have rights to the league's vast inventory of home football, men's basketball, and women's basketball games. For specific's regarding the Big 12 TV Contracts, click <font color="#500000">here</font>.</p>

There are quite a few baseball and softball games, tennis matches, swim meets, women's basketball and even a few men's basketball and football games that are not selected by ESPN and Fox Sports. And it's those contests, and only those contests, which may be broadcast on a school's own network. We call it a third-tier network. We broadcast many of these contests for free on our Aggies All-Access website powered by CBS Sports. I'm proud to say we have more viewers of our contests than the next three CBS Sports powered websites combined. In effect, that is our Aggie Network and we offer it to you for free around the world.</p>

When we built the 12th Man Productions facilities, our plan was all along to eventually put together an Aggie Network. We are better positioned than any other conference school to do it. Having said that, we would still need to invest millions of dollars to hire the staff, and purchase the equipment and air time to do our own network. And while we would have some live programming from what ABC/ESPN and Fox Sports did not select, the bulk of programming would be replays of recent games and rebroadcasts of historical games. Even ESPN does not have enough live programming to fill its' schedule each day. That's why the Aggie Network is still on the internet.</p>

Today, the financial numbers simply do not work in our favor to produce 168 hours of TV every week.If you think about it, a separate school network does not work unless it's public television, and they need all kinds of institutional and federal government funding. Last time I checked, the college athletic departments are not eligible.</p>

On the other hand, a conference television network can work. There is enough live and delayed inventory to fill the week, although, even then, the live programming would be skimpy.I would support the new Big 12 doing developing its own network. If you have your own network, the paradigm has shifted on how you build a conference. You ultimately want to expand your footprint to increase the number of cable/satellite viewers who pay a monthly fee to receive your network.</p>

</p>

Statement Two: By joining the SEC, we would finally get out of the shadow of our friends from the state capital. </p>
We are our own great institution. Our university leadership considered all the information at their disposal, weighed the options available, and made a decision they felt was in the best interest of Texas A&M and our student-athletes. There was no consideration of what was in anybody else's best interest. If anyone feels that a shadow is cast by our friends in the state capital, the way to remedy that is to beat them on the fields of play along with all of our other opponents. And that is our mission.

Statement Three: You are DeLoss Dodds' lapdog and things worse, actually much worse. </p>
After reading over 200 similar e-mails the other night, I finally had one set me off and I called the writer.I'm a very competitive person and like many of you, I was raised not to back down when challenged. I've also got a bit of an Irish temper which came across in my voicemail. I regretted what I said as soon as I hung up.I should have been above that, and I made a mistake. For those of you who were offended by my response, I apologize, and I assure you that it will not happen again.

Statement Four: I'm done supporting Texas A&M and will not return until you change conferences. </p>
I regret that very much. One of the challenges we face at Texas A&M is we have never sold out Kyle Field in season tickets. I attributed that to a margin of our fans that focus on who the Aggies are playing instead the fact the Aggies are playing. Folks tell me they take pride on being big Aggie supporters. To the fans on the margin it means they have never missed a game against our friends from the state capital or a big game in general. Great program's fans support their team regardless of the opponent. They are grateful to be in the stadium. My hope is we can build Texas A&M football to be one of those great programs.

Statement Five: Are we better off in Big 12 or Pac 10 or SEC. </p>
The answer is Big 12. Here are some reasons why. First, we are still in the same time zone competing. That means we can get our student-athletes back in class the next day after a road trip. It's one of the reasons our student-athletes were so supportive of us staying in the Big 12. Second, we are receiving the same financial dollars would have received by going east or west. Plus, our operating costs are reduced. Our estimates said it would cost us an extra million dollars a year in travel to go east or west. Third, by adding another conference game to our regular schedule in football and two more conference games in basketball, we will have more attractive schedules. And, we won't have to pay as many exorbitant fees to get non-conference teams to come play us in Aggieland.

Statement Six: You passed up the stability of the SEC. </p>
There are almost as many opinions on collegiate athletics stability as there are fans of college athletics.

Statement Seven: The TV dollars Commissioner Dan Beebe conned you with to stay in the Big 12 are just projected dollars and are not real. </p>
We are starting negotiations with FOX. I thought our Big 12 Commissioner Dan Beebe did a masterful job convincing our TV partners we needed the Big 12 to stay together. The dollars are real, but we can't put anything in writing, because the current contract has clauses which allows for certain negotiating periods. Now it's a legal issue. We have long term relationships with these TV partners, and we accept their good faith assurances that they will do better by us.

Statement Eight: A&M got played. </p>
No, if anything we were very diligent. From many of the national sportswriters' prospective they said we did the right thing by taking a considered approach and making a thoughtful decision.

Statement Nine: The Aggie fans were energized with the notion of going to the SEC. </p>
I appreciate the fact our fans were energized. I was too. In the end, we did what we thought was best for Texas A&M, our student-athletes, and the State of Texas. Given the changing landscape of college athletics, the fact we are Texas A&M University, and with the improvements in our overall athletic program and University, we continue to make ourselves more attractive on the national scale.

Statement 10: Texas saved the Big 12.</p>
There were several schools that "saved" the Big 12. The conference was on life support and the continual releasing of information to Orangebloods throughout this process only intensified the situation. If we've learned anything from this process, it's that negotiations and discussions of this magnitude are best to take place behind closed doors.

Statement 11: What is our share of the Big 12 revenue each year?</p>
Our revenue share from the Big 12 this year is $9.2 million. In the new agreement, we will have a base of $20 million. The Big 12 generates revenue in four ways: television rights agreements with ABC/ESPN and Fox, participation in the NCAA men's basketball championship, participation in football bowl games, and from revenue associated with postseason Big 12 championships and the league's football championship game.

The bottom line to all of this is to say our friends in the state capital have a great program and a great brand. They could go to any conference they choose. <font color="#500000">I found an article</font> describing what may have turned our friends around that you might find interesting. They eventually made the same decision we did to stay right where we are and have been for many years. Throughout this I said we are committed to the Big 12. We never wavered and our future is financially better.</p>
</div>
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,062
25,095
113
They're trying to spin all this as a win for the conference, but the fact is they lost 2 good schools and a lucrative championship game. He even says himself that
The dollars are real, but we can't put anything in writing, because the current contract has clauses which allows for certain negotiating periods. Now it's a legal issue. We have long term relationships with these TV partners, and we accept their good faith assurances that they will do better by us.
So the fact is, the actual numbers haven't been determined yet. I'm betting when they are, they're going to be short of the numbers being thrown around. Also, remember that A&M's share is going to be significantly more than most of the rest of the schools and that the SEC's $17M per school amount is going to continue to increase throughout the term of our deal.
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,797
6,449
113
to the network in exchange for a bigger Big 12-2 TV deal. Remember this entire deal just involves several million more dollars to the respective schools. Like it or not that is chicken feed these days.
 

ScoobaDawg

Redshirt
Jun 4, 2007
3,060
10
38
http://texas.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1094753

The Big 12 was dead. Gone. No pulse.

The funerals were planned in Lubbock and Austin on Tuesday. And again in
Norman and Stillwater on Wednesday. Texas A&M would show its last
respects later in the week, when it pushed off for Birmingham, Ala., to
pop corks with SEC commissioner Mike Slive.

The Big 12 was so dead. The surviving family - Missouri, Kansas, Kansas
State, Iowa State and Baylor - did things you only promise to a dead
person. Things you probably don't ever expect to have to pay - like
promising the $35 million to $40 million in buyout penalties from
Nebraska and Colorado to Texas, Texas A&M and Oklahoma.

(Everyone wants to know how those three get to $20 million guaranteed in
the new Big 12-Lite? That's how.)

But let's go back and revisit how a corpse not only regains a heartbeat
but goes out and wins a 400-meter race in record time four days after
receiving a toe tag.


Wednesday, June 9 - Orangebloods.com reports, according to a
source close to the Nebraska Board of Regents, that the Cornhuskers are
going to the Big Ten and will make a formal announcement two days later
on Friday.

I'm driving home from a live remote radio show and call one of my
sources at UT. I'm told president William Powers and athletic director
DeLoss Dodds have gathered the coaches at UT and tell them, "We've done
all we can to save the Big 12 but were unsuccessful."

A plan to join the Pac-16 is basically laid out.


Thursday, June 10 - The Pac-10 announces it is adding Colorado.
Orangebloods.com reports that Nebraska will announce on Friday that it
is headed to the Big Ten. And OB also reports that Texas A&M is
seriously considering the Southeastern Conference and may be put on the
clock to respond to its Pac-10 invitation.

This is the first time it's becoming apparent that Texas A&M might
not play ball with the other Big 12 teams being invited to the Pac-10.
But, according to top sources, Texas A&M athletic director Bill
Byrne is basically assuring Texas that the Aggies will join Texas in the
Pac-10. So Texas feels like the Aggies will come around.


Friday, June 11 - Nebraska bolts the Big 12 for the Big Ten and
throws Missouri and Texas under the bus in the process. Colorado holds a
press conference with Pac-10 commissioner Larry Scott saying the
Buffaloes are headed west.

Sources would later say Colorado panicked at this point because the
Buffaloes thought they needed to act more quickly than the others
because Baylor might be moving in on their invitation to the Pac-10.
(Now, Colorado owes $15 million in buyout penalties to the Big 12 that
it can't afford.)

Texas schedules a regents meeting for Tuesday at 11 a.m. This meeting is
to announce that the Longhorns are going to the Pac-10. Texas Tech
officials post a regents meeting for Tuesday as well. Oklahoma and
Oklahoma State post regents meetings for Wednesday. All with the
expectation of announcing they are heading west to the Pac-10.

Orangebloods.com reports that all four schools (Texas, Texas Tech,
Oklahoma State and OU) have confirmed they are heading to the Pac-10
with announcements due after the weekend.


Saturday, June 12 - The focus shifts to College Station. Mike
Slive the Southeastern Conference commissioner is in College Station to
visit with A&M officials. But A&M athletic director Bill Byrne
is nowhere to be found. He's at a family reunion in Idaho.

Suddenly Texas' best source for information from A&M is in doubt.
How connected is he to the situation?

According to two of the best sources for Orangebloods.com throughout the
Big 12 Missile Crisis, Texas A&M has a vote of at least 6-3 to go
to the SEC, and we report that.

Other sources around the Big 12 are starting to say Texas A&M is
waiting for Texas to hang itself at the press conference on Tuesday
before the Aggies announce their departure for the SEC.

Athletic director DeLoss Dodds and UT women's athletic director Chris
Plonsky smell the rat: Texas is going to get blamed for breaking up the
Big 12 AND for ripping up the 100-year rivalry with Texas A&M. The
Aggies aren't going to the Pac-10. The Aggies aren't budging.

A shot of the president's box at the Texas-TCU NCAA Super Regional
baseball game on Saturday tells it all. There was Powers, a Cal graduate
who had convinced the Texas Board of Regents the Pac-10 was the right
move for academic and athletic reasons, had Plonsky over his left
shoulder, leaning into his ear. Dodds was casual and calm with Mack
Brown to Dodds' left.

I would joke with Brown on Tuesday that there had to be more going on in
that picture than watching baseball. Mack Brown smiled and said, "Nope,
just cheering on Texas to beat TCU."

Meanwhile, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State's presidents and athletic
directors meet with Pac-10 commissioner Larry Scott in Oklahoma City.


Sunday, June 13 - Texas is starting to get the sense A&M is
not turning back from the SEC. That any information it got from Byrne is
useless at this point, according to sources. Gene Stallings, A&M
System chancellor Mike McKinney and other A&M regents led by Morris
Foster, a former ExxonMobil executive, are leading the Aggies toward the
SEC.

The notion of separating from Texas is starting to feel invigorating to
the Aggie power brokers. Foster likes the idea of A&M being the top
research insitution in the SEC. Stallings wants A&M football to
connect with history shared by Alabama (Bear Bryant coaching at A&M
before winning six national titles at Bama).

And McKinney is ready to collect the paychecks of at least $17.4 million
to help get the Ags out of the $16 million hole the athletic department
is in.

With the Big 12's obituary seemingly imminent, Big 12 commissioner Dan
Beebe secures assurances from ABC/ESPN that it will honor its current
contract with the Big 12 through 2016 even if the league is 10 members
and without a conference championship game. Meaning, all of Colorado's
and Nebraska's share of the TV revenue as well as the money from the
championship game would now be divided between the 10 schools.

The five schools who appeared to be the pall bearers for the Big 12 -
Missouri, Kansas, Kansas State, Iowa State and Baylor - make a
commitment to hand over their share of the $35 million to $40 million in
penalties to be paid by Nebraska and Colorado to Texas, Oklahoma and
Texas A&M.

Now, those three schools are guaranteed to start making $20 million
immediately. No waiting. No fuss no muss - $20 million.

That number is better than the payout of the SEC ($17.4 million) for
Texas A&M. It also is better than the Pac-10, which initially sold
the Big 12 schools on a number of $20 million starting in 2012, but
later said it might take a year or two to scale to $20 million,
according to sources. The initial number might be closer to $17 million
in 2012 and $20 million by 2013 or 2014. So suddenly Texas is better off
by $3 million with no waiting.

Larry Scott and Pac-10 chief operating officer Kevin Weiberg fly from
Oklahoma City to College Station Sunday morning. A meeting between
Scott, Weiberg and A&M president R. Bowen Loftin and a couple
regents is short and not so sweet. Texas A&M tells the Pac-10
officials they are not ready to accept an invitation. The Pac-10, which
is actively falling in love with Kansas, takes this as a refused
invitation.

Scott and Weiberg fly from College Station to Lubbock and are met with a
king's welcome. If Tech's board of regents could have accepted a bid to
the Pac-10 right then and there, they would have. Scott and Weiberg
leave Lubbock feeling like they've got Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and
Tech. All they need now is Texas, and they can figure out the rest (sub
Kansas for Texas A&M).

But by the time Scott and Weiberg get to Austin on Sunday night, DeLoss
Dodds and Chris Plonsky are already feeling queasy about everything,
according to sources.

Dodds and Plonsky are already anticipating that Texas is going to get
blamed for ripping up the Big 12, for tearing apart the rivalry with
Texas A&M and for agreeing to a deal with the Pac-10 that is not as
financially sound as the one now facing them thanks to Dan Beebe's
hustling of ABC/ESPN and the generostiy of the Desperate Five in the Big
12 (Missouri, Kansas, Kansas State, Iowa State and Baylor).

Texas knows with the $20 million guarantee and the ability to launch its
own network in the Big 12, the Longhorns could be pulling in between
$23 million and $25 million in no time. They'd be the richest school in
the BCS in terms of TV revenue. And that total could scale if the
Longhorn Network was a success and surpassed its consultants early
projections of $3 million to $5 million per year.

And Scott and Weiberg made one critical mistake in the courtship of the
Big 12. Other than its somewhat foggy math that a 16-team Pac-10 could
readily get to $20 million in TV revenue per school, they wanted to
substitute Kansas for Oklahoma State late in the process, according to
multiple sources in the Big 12.

Texas was really starting to feel queasy now, sources said. UT officials
knew deep down Texas A&M wasn't coming to the Pac-10, despite Bill
Byrne's assurances, according to sources. And now Scott and Weiberg were
looking to dump Oklahoma State in favor of Kansas. If A&M was a
no-show, the Pac-10 would add Utah. Scott was looking to add new TV
markets, not stick to the deal that was agreed upon a few days earlier.

According to sources who talked to me Tuesday (two days after the fact),
Dodds and Plonsky couldn't stop thinking about all the negatives. And
now they were dealing with a wheeler-dealer Pac-10 commissioner who
wanted to sub out Boone Pickens' Cowboys for the chance to grab the 8
million households in the state of Missouri.

Dodds had given Oklahoma State his word they would be part of the group
headed west. Now, the Pac-10 wanted to do some late rearranging. Dodds
didn't feel good about it, sources said Tuesday. Now, Dodds and Plonsky
had to convince Powers that the Beebe Plan was the best plan.

Powers had convinced the board of regents the Pac-10 was the answer if
Nebraska came out of the league, according to the sources who talked on
Tuesday.

(Powers had such a strong relationship with Nebraska chancellor Harvey
Perlman that in his mind the conference was toast without Nebraska in
the league.)

I made routine calls to my sources across the Big 12 Sunday night and
got one response at 10:40 p.m. CT on a text message that said, "Texas
may be changing course. Look into it."

I tried to reach more sources. But it was late. I couldn't sleep at all
that night. I just kept scanning other media outlets' web sites to see
if they had the news. Nothing. I still couldn't sleep. I fell asleep for
a couple hours - from about 4 a.m. to 6 a.m. CT - on the couch in my
kids' play room. I took over that room the previous two weeks because it
has a TV in it, and I needed a place where I could work and keep one
eye on my laptop and one eye on ESPN News.


Monday, June 14 - How early is too early to call a source?

In this case, it's never too early. I was carpet-bombing every source I
had in the story thus far to find out if Texas was changing course.

At 8 a.m., another top source in this story told me Texas was not only
changing course, it was almost ready to commit to a remodeled Big 12.

Bingo.

I cobbled a story together about how Texas had gone from nearly being
signed, sealed, delivered to the West Coast to racing back to the Big 12
dinner table to see if there was any food.

I popped my story on Orangebloods.com at 8:36 a.m. and began Twittering
furiously to draw attention to it. I got up to run to Starbucks for an
iced, venti, Chai latte and by the time I got back home, Joe Schad of
ESPN was saying in a story and on television that Beebe's plan had
"zero" chance for survival.

Gulp.

My immediate thought was Schad knows something I don't because I knew
ABC/ESPN was involved in the Beebe Plan. What if The Worldwide Leader
had pulled its assurances off the table? Did Schad get summoned down the
hall in Bristol to some executive's office and learn ABC/ESPN had
pulled the rug out from under the Beebe plan?

I started texting my sources immediately, wondering if even they knew
about some new wrinkle to the story. Then, I got a text back saying, "No
worries. The train is still on the tracks."

I Twittered to my now 12,000 followers, "I'm not backing off my story."

And then all the other texts and calls I'd sent out started responding.
Texas A&M was at the table and seemingly on board. So was OU. I
already knew the Desperate Five were on board. And I knew Texas Tech and
Oklahoma State weren't going to do anything without Texas, OU and Texas
A&M.

(Although Texas Tech's regents put that to the test on Tuesday, waiting
to agree to the Huck Finn blood oath to be a happy camper in the Big
12-Lite until about 3:30 p.m. CT).

All my sources started weighing in, saying the deal to rescue the Big
12-Lite was almost done. By 4 p.m. CT, I had confirmation from all my
top sources the deal was done. Then, a press conference at Texas was
announced for 10 a.m. CT Tuesday, and a teleconference with Beebe was
scheduled for 11 a.m. CT.


Tuesday, June 15 - We learn from the Texas and Beebe media
conferences and some more reporting from sources that ABC/ESPN basically
protected its investments and held off college realignment by allowing
the 10 schools in the Big 12 to keep all the money ABC/ESPN agreed to
pay the league through 2016 when it had 12 members and a conference
championship game.

Why would ABC/ESPN agree to such a bad deal? I'm convinced because it
didn't want to see Texas and Oklahoma disappear to the Pac-16 conference
network likely to be run by Fox. ABC/ESPN, in my opinion, also saw the
possibility of realignment coming if the Big 12 fell apart, and that
could have led to remodeling the SEC and ACC, conferences in which
ABC/ESPN has more than $4 billion tied up in TV contracts.

If the SEC expands by four or the ACC gets picked apart and then
remodeled in some merger with the Big East, ABC/ESPN likely has to
renegotiate those deals, possibly for more than the $4 billion it had
already committed.

So why not just honor the deal it had struck with the Big 12 despite
losing two teams and a conference championship game? By comparison it
was a relative pittance to keep Texas and Oklahoma away from Fox and
protect its investments in the SEC and ACC.

As for Texas, becoming the first to blink, back away from its Pac-10
invitation and reach out to Texas A&M at the bargaining table,
credit both the Aggies and the Longhorns for realizing the time wasn't
right to break up a 100-year rivalry that even includes mentions of each
school in the other's fight song.

In the end, the Big 12 is not a better football league than it was less
than a week ago. It's a better basketball league (18-game conference
schedule, meaning Kansas, Kansas State and Missouri now play Texas and
A&M home and home).

But the principals in the deal walk away feeling better about the knowns
than what seemed like some elusive answers about the unknowns.


THE WINNERS:

TEXAS A&M -
Aggies' athletics are $16 million in debt and one
big dysfunctional family (How else do you explain Bill Byrne at a family
reunion in Idaho when the Ags are contemplating their most important
moment in the last 100 years?).

But say what you want about Gene Stallings and A&M system chancellor
Mike McKinney zeroing in on the SEC. They didn't waver, and it finally
got to Texas.

As UT officials began having doubts about the Pac-10 deal, the Longhorns
didn't want to be seen as the drivers in ripping apart the Big 12 and a
100-year rivalry with the Aggies.

UT officials ultimately blinked first and said they'd go back to the
table for the Beebe Plan if A&M would. The Aggies did and walked
away with $20 million guaranteed - the same as Texas and OU - because it
had a real suitor. Not bad for a destitute, non-performing football
program for most of the past decade.


ABC/ESPN - On its face, it looks like the Worldwide Leader is
getting taken to the cleaners by continuing to pay the Big 12 for the
next seven years as if it's a 12-member league with a conference
championship game (even though it's a 10-member league with no title
game).

But ABC/ESPN isn't out any more money, and it protected its interest in
several areas (UT and OU don't go to Fox; the SEC and ACC likely don't
expand; Notre Dame remains an independent; and college realignment is
averted for at least seven more years.)


DAN BEEBE - Put in a bad spot from the beginning as Big 12
commissioner because he inherited staggered TV contracts (the cable deal
with Fox expires in 2012, while its network deal with ABC/ESPN expires
in 2016), Beebe went to ABC/ESPN, asked them to honor a bad contract and
got a dysfunctional family back to the table.

That's not easy. Think of all the rancor in this league (starting with
Missouri's open flirtation with the Big Ten, which launched the
"instability" in the league a year ago). And now think of the money
pouring into a league with no championship game and only 10 members (or
only 2 members depending on your count - Texas and OU - come on Tech,
A&M and anyone from the Big 12 North).

Beebe came up with the Beebe Plan, and it saved a league that was always
the most likely candidate to get picked apart and possibly trigger
realignment. This was no easy sales job, considering all the
conversations between his member schools and other conferences. Dan
Beebe comes out a huge winner in this.



TEXAS - The Longhorns walked away from a deal with the Pac-10
they were losing confidence in; preserved their 100-year rivalry with
A&M; AND walk away with the chance to make between $23 million and
$25 million in TV revenue thanks to its own network (and maybe more).

And don't forget the easier path to a national title game (without a
conference title game).


THE DESPERATE FIVE - The decision by Missouri, Kansas, Kansas
State, Iowa State and Baylor to pool their share of the
Nebraska/Colorado penalty money ($35 million to $40 million) and give it
to OU, Texas A&M and Texas costs these five in the short-term. But
it worked. They helped save the conference, and now they are going to
earn between $14 million and $17 million each going forward.


THE LOSERS


COLORADO -
The Buffaloes can spin this any way they want, but they
effectively gambled and lost. They got out ahead of the posse on Friday,
hoping to cut off Baylor from trying to wrangle its invitation to the
Pac-10, according to sources. The Buffs believed Texas, Oklahoma,
Oklahoma State and Texas Tech were unshakable to the Pac-10, thus
anticipating the Big 12 would crumble, so there would be no one left to
collect the Buffs' buyout penalties. Now, there are 10 schools gladly
waiting to line their pockets with $15 million the Buffs' can't afford
to pay. (CU couldn't afford to pay Dan Hawkins' $3 million buyout last
year. Gulp.)


THE FANS - Fans of the Big 12 lose one of the great,
tradition-laden programs in the history of college football (Nebraska),
and they lose a conference championship game at Jerryworld starting in
2012. Some fans with ties to most of the Big 12 South fans also miss out
on road trips to Scottsdale, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Eugene and
Seattle. OK, I'll stop now while I'm behind ...


TEXAS TECH - The Red Raiders probably have a legit gripe about
not being included in the payout from the Desperate Five. After all,
Tech has been in the Top Two in the last two years, while Texas A&M
has been sucking wind for most of the past decade. So the thought of
Tech making $14 million to $17 million when Texas A&M is poised to
rake in $20 million has to burn like acid reflux.

The Tech regents wanted to make the rest of the Big 12-Lite feel their
pain, so they didn't agree to sign the Huck Finn blood oath to be a
happy camper in the Big 12 on Sunday, opting to make everyone wait until
3 p.m. on Monday. Tommy Tuberville will have a winner on the field
soon, so the Red Raiders will pop some Tums and get over this.

Orangebloods.com broke the story about the Pac-10 possibly raiding half
the Big 12 on June 3. The next 12 days threatened to change the
direction of college athletics for the next 100 years. Against maybe all
odds, the Big 12 Missile Crisis ended with diverging forces standing
down.

If Texas A&M decides to go with Texas to the Pac-10, we might have
had complete upheaval and the beginning of massive college realignment,
resulting in four, 16-team mega conferences. As it stands now,
realignment appears to have been averted for at least the next seven
years (until the ABC/ESPN contract expires).

For now, these will live on as the 12 days that could have changed the
course of college athletics ... but didn't.
 
J

JimHalpert.nafoom

Guest
The big schools that were threatening to leave (Texas, A&M, OU) get $20 million, which comes from the the other schools like Kansas, Kansas State, and Missouri. The big schools basically bullied the smaller schools into giving them their lunch money.
 
Mar 9, 2008
131
0
0
significantly less (half as much). Let's face it, if the SEC had the same unequal revenue sharing, most year's we'd be getting a Kansas-sized slice. Meanwhile, UF & Bama would make more than TX.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,062
25,095
113
But there's a whole lot of spin too. That article is a propoganda article for the Texas fanbase.
 

paindonthurt_

All-Conference
Jun 27, 2009
9,528
2,045
113
a win/win for them.

They wanted to stay in the Big 12 and get a bigger piece of the pie, but if Texas wouldn't play ball, then they could bolt to the SEC and have just as good of a deal if not better.

The only reason I say the two situations were equal for A&M is due to the expenses of playing in the SEC compared to the Big 12.
 

Mjoelner

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2006
2,666
1,123
113
<font size="2" face="Arial">
This isn't the entire post but it is the guts of it.

<font size="2" face="Arial">At 7:30 a.m. yesterday morning, I receive a phone call from a restricted number. It was Bill. He said I was right in what I said in my e-mail and that he should not have done that. We went on to talk about the matters of conference realignment. He said that he was actually leaning more towards joining the SEC, but higher powers interfered, and would basically not allow us to go anywhere. I asked him about the "guaranteed" money we are supposedly going to be receiving, and he said that those numbers are not projections, but are in fact guaranteed numbers. NOTE: I do not believe him in this.

We went on to talk about how he thought the "student athletes" goal is to graduate, and that certain people felt that joining the SEC would dissolve that somewhat.(take that for what its worth). One interesting thing he did say, and he may not even know, is that no one other than Dodds, thinks that Texas' own TV network will ever succeed or pan out for that matter. He said that they would need to attract viewers to watch sporting events such as regular season track, sotball, etc. for it to ever work. Colorado got asked to the PAC-10 because of the market in Denver.

When I asked him of the other powers that came into play in this matter, he explained to me that Presidents, AD's, current coaches, and even ex-coaches, as well as politics(Rick Perry) had a say in what went on as well.</font>
</font>