Nkimdeche's counter sue...

57stratdawg

Heisman
Dec 1, 2004
148,414
24,192
113
Was that the rape, beaten frat guys, or stolen credit cards? They all seem to be running together.
 

RebelAlumnus

Heisman
Jul 9, 2013
18,946
46,689
113
I can't remember. I thought it was either the curb stomping of the police officer or the bar fight, but maybe I'm mistaken.
 

coach66

Junior
Mar 5, 2009
12,692
314
83
Only dumbass wouldn't counter, hell

That frat boy is trying to ruin their good name and what makes them look even more innocent is they didn't claim self defense*.
 

jb1020

Freshman
Jun 7, 2009
1,866
87
48
Best part of the article

The Ole Miss Police Department never pursued charges in the case. UPD Captain Michael Harmon said that, “A person was hit but he didn’t know who hit him.”

derrrrrr

i can't believe they got a name to go with that quote. I'd like to see some info on who was questioned when the police showed up. Or was anyone actually questions at all.
 

HD6

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
10,019
108
63
I have an honest question. Is that normal procedure? No investigation, no nothing? The victim couldn't identify the assailant, so we moved on?
 

jb1020

Freshman
Jun 7, 2009
1,866
87
48
I'd be shocked if that were standard procedure

But it sure looks like that's what happened in this case?

dude got beat up, no one came forward...case closed.

Would this plaintiff have a case against oxford or campus police?
 

Rebels7

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
1,389
0
0
I have an honest question. Is that normal procedure? No investigation, no nothing? The victim couldn't identify the assailant, so we moved on?

In my experience, it's not normal unless all the evidence exonerates them. I.E. police reports, lack of criminal charges, they are people of public record (famous football players). They're making a case for libel, possibly.
 

WrapItDog

Senior
Aug 23, 2012
4,302
723
113
I have an honest question. Is that normal procedure? No investigation, no nothing? The victim couldn't identify the assailant, so we moved on?

The unconscious victim couldn't identify the assailant, so we moved on
 

crackerjax

Sophomore
Aug 24, 2012
322
123
43
If the counter-claim is just for defamation, it probably won't make it past an early motion to dismiss. You generally can't base a defamation claim on statements made in a legal pleading. Litigation privilege.
 

Rebels7

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
1,389
0
0
Court pleadings are privileged, for purposes of defamation.

There's a reason why going to an undergrad institution with a law school does not make you a legal expert.

I'm a lawyer, hotshot. Hence the term, "possibly."
 

121Josey

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2012
7,503
0
0
There's a reason why you guys SHOULDN'T have a law school

I'm a lawyer, hotshot. Hence the term, "possibly."

So you're a message board lawyer. Welcome to the club!**

I would expect better from a real lawyer than this **** you threw on this board.

Original question

I have an honest question. Is that normal procedure? No investigation, no nothing? The victim couldn't identify the assailant, so we moved on?

Your response

In my experience, it's not normal unless all the evidence exonerates them. I.E. police reports, lack of criminal charges, they are people of public record (famous football players). They're making a case for libel, possibly.

What does the investigation have to do with the evidence?

I would expect someone with at least 7 years higher education to have at least a halfway decent use of grammar - even on a message board. You don't even know how to use "i.e." properly. I'm no English major but damn son.

I'm a lawyer, hotshot. Hence the term, "possibly."

WTF does you being a lawyer have to do with you using the word "possibly?" Are you trying to write legalese in your half-baked post? Since you have followed these events so closely, would you care to enlighten us to what other purpose the defendants may have for filing a counter-suit other than the term "libel"?**
 

Rebels7

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
1,389
0
0
So you're a message board lawyer. Welcome to the club!**

I would expect better from a real lawyer than this **** you threw on this board.

Original question



Your response



What does the investigation have to do with the evidence?

I would expect someone with at least 7 years higher education to have at least a halfway decent use of grammar - even on a message board. You don't even know how to use "i.e." properly. I'm no English major but damn son.



WTF does you being a lawyer have to do with you using the word "possibly?" Are you trying to write legalese in your half-baked post? Since you have followed these events so closely, would you care to enlighten us to what other purpose the defendants may have for filing a counter-suit other than the term "libel"?**

I haven't followed **** closely. I'm not obsessed like some people are. "Possibly" means that may or may not be the foundation of a libel suit. But I don't know. Hence, "possibly."


ETA: You actually watched Chicago?
 
Last edited:

121Josey

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2012
7,503
0
0
I haven't followed **** closely. I'm not obsessed like some people are. "Possibly" means that may or may not be the foundation of a libel suit. But I don't know. Hence, "possibly."

ETA: You actually watched Chicago?

Since you were striving for precision in your argument, "probably" may have been a better "term" choice. But because I'm not a lawyer, I used the term "may" - not "might".**

I haven't seen the movie or the show, but I've seen the city. What a town!
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,867
6,568
113
Dude you are one of the most "obsessed" Ole Miss people I`ve ever seen. Do you think none of us ever read Nafoom? Your over-the-top hatred for Mississippi state and everything about the school can`t be described as anything but "obsessed". "Haven`t followed **** closely" my ***.
 

LawDawg97

Redshirt
Sep 7, 2012
1,138
0
0
The guy who isn't obsessed was posting on this message board

at 11:00 pm last night and again before 6:00 this morning. I'm sure he was reading up on world events in between. "Possibly" obsessed? Maybe preoccupied is the better word?
 

NIC.sixpack

Redshirt
Apr 12, 2013
106
0
0
Would this plaintiff have a case against oxford or campus police?

Probably not. Police departments are government agencies, and they're generally immune from being sued subject to certain exceptions. Based on what we know as of now, the plaintiff wouldn't have much of a chance of recovering anything.
 

RebelAlumnus

Heisman
Jul 9, 2013
18,946
46,689
113
I don't remember that either. Are you talking about that officer that got drug down Jackson Ave?

Are you talking about the case that didn't involve football players and the kid was sent to jail for? Because that's not really relevant in this discussion.

Maybe you should have mentioned the LBer who was kicked off after his fifth arrest, that being a third degree domestic violence charge.

Or maybe the two players who were waving handguns around on campus.

The point that you obviously missed was that, while some of you sit up on your thrones talking about the arrests at Ole Miss, y'all have just as many and just as poor of outcomes. It's moronic to act like one coach is running a cleaner program than the other when they all have people arrested and all have to suspend/dismiss players.
 

MedDawg

Senior
May 29, 2001
5,231
856
113
AK did the same thing after assaulting that cabbie....

Are the Nkemdiches also claiming loss of consortium?
 

ckDOG

All-American
Dec 11, 2007
10,016
5,855
113
Possibly true, but ever since the Gospel according to Hugh arrived to town...

The point that you obviously missed was that, while some of you sit up on your thrones talking about the arrests at Ole Miss, y'all have just as many and just as poor of outcomes. It's moronic to act like one coach is running a cleaner program than the other when they all have people arrested and all have to suspend/dismiss players.

...it's more fun to rub noses in the mess.