No Manning vs. Manning Super Bowl this year

Barkman Turner Overdrive

All-Conference
May 28, 2006
4,517
2,907
113
There was no reason San Diego should get three questionable calls during OT. The defensive holding call and the bogus facemask should not have been called for sure.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
55,908
24,877
113
The facemask was so obvious that even the player who committed the foul jumped up in disgust even before the flag was thrown. He knew he'd 17ed up and given the Chargers a first down.
 

dogfan96

Redshirt
Jun 3, 2007
2,188
12
66
the facemask was one of the most blatant and obvious that you'll ever see. The defensive holding call was probably more like illegal contact but either way it was an automatic first down. No way they can ***** about that call after they lobbied to the league to get calls just like that one.
 

Barkman Turner Overdrive

All-Conference
May 28, 2006
4,517
2,907
113
I've never seen a defensive lineman get called for defensive holding on a running play. That was the first questionable call. With all the other stuff going on and the call that?

The facemask call was close. I don't see how all three close calls could go against one team.