Just to be clear, Number 1 & Number 3 are opinion pieces written by 2 separate individuals. Number 2 is an actual news report.
It doesn't matter to them. Facts to fit the conclusion.Just to be clear, Number 1 & Number 3 are opinion pieces written by 2 separate individuals. Number 2 is an actual news report.
It doesn't matter to them. Facts to fit the conclusion.
Exactly the point of the thread title.Just to be clear, Number 1 & Number 3 are opinion pieces written by 2 separate individuals. Number 2 is an actual news report.
It doesn't matter to them. Facts to fit the conclusion.
Sure they are and every poster on this board has said they are. Pose the question: Does the major media overall have a liberal bias and lets see what the results will be.Is Fox biased? lmfao
lol, It's TV, It's about ratings not the news, you will be uninformed and stupid no matter which side you are on if you get all your news from TV. Is Fox biased? lmfao
One opinion piece was pro, one was con....What about 2 opinion pieces and a news story changes the fact that they are as biased as msnbc now?
One opinion piece was pro, one was con....
An opinion piece talking about why we should want something that isn't yet....than an opinion piece about what we should be careful of now that it exists. Would you prefer the other way around?You're still not making a valid argument. Perhaps if they were side by side same day. But not from the same publisher before and after the announcement
An opinion piece talking about why we should want something that isn't yet....than an opinion piece about what we should be careful of now that it exists. Would you prefer the other way around?
No....that's about right, imo. The US, Syria and Nicaragua....but it's just a bunch of ********, right?
Even some of the biggest energy companies in the US wanted us to stay in this agreementIt is biased as hell, you know it but are not intellectually honest enough to admit it. And yes the Paris climate accord was absolute ********.
Each country sets their own goals. Even if Paris remained, it would impact global warming by .05 degree C by the year 2100. Yet, it would cost us trillions.
Hahahaha hahahah, no ****. 20% estimated increase to consumers with taxpayer funded efficiency research development. Uh yea, I'd imagine they'd be for that.Even some of the biggest energy companies in the US wanted us to stay in this agreement