Northwestern players ruled to be employees...

Rog.sixpack

Redshirt
Nov 7, 2013
302
0
16
IRS gonna tax scholly value, per diem, housing, CoL stipend etc?

Not to mention, the upper tiers of the union org will have generous salaries paid via mandatory dues.


The NLRB is full of morons.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
16,027
5,854
113
Very interesting to see from a purely legal perspective.

From a fan's perspective, this sucks. But nothing stays the same and everything gets worse over time. College football wont be an exception to that rule.
 

Irondawg

Senior
Dec 2, 2007
2,894
553
113
The women's sports better band together and fight this hard. This gets implemented and you can basically kiss most of their sports goodbye
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,868
6,568
113
Key words

The landmark ruling affects only students at private universities. State university college athletes who want to unionize must appeal to their state’s labor board.
 

karlchilders.sixpack

All-Conference
Jun 5, 2008
19,998
3,990
113
Certainly could have an impact

I predict potentially reduce attendance and reduced alumni donations.

Hope this does not grow widespread legs.

Oh Well.
 

futaba.79

Redshirt
Jun 4, 2007
2,296
0
0
Title IX...........

will definitely get twisted if athletes are unionized employees. Non-revenue producers won't unionize for fear of the sport getting dropped. If only football and basketball go the employee route, then it's possible they will no longer count in the Title IX formula. That might open the door for schools to add opportunities for men.
 

121Josey

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2012
7,503
0
0
Nobody should be surprised at the result. They were arguing before the National Labor Relations board and not a state or federal judge.

Here's the arguments from the article via S.I. Does this describe a student?
Football players at Northwestern are compensated for a service (i.e. football) with athletics-based grants-in-aid, or scholarships; they have supervisors (i.e. coaches) who control their schedules and monitor what they say on social media; they must abide by certain rules and regulations, and are held to different standards than other students; they can have their compensation taken away (i.e. have their scholarship revoked) for violating those rules and lose their jobs (i.e. their spots in the lineup) if they skip practices or games; and they have a contract (i.e. an athletic tender agreement) that stipulates what they must do to maintain their scholarship.

Can an athlete have his contract - I mean scholarship - terminated? They are for only one year, right?

Usually when somebody is compensated, he is held to a higher standard. Nobody really pays attention to those who pay themselves or volunteer. Are walk-ons employees?
 
Last edited:

johnson86-1

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2012
14,341
4,849
113
Scholarship amounts beyond tuition are already taxed. I don't think anybody actually pays it, but technically they are taxed.
 

RocketDawg

All-Conference
Oct 21, 2011
18,997
2,084
113
And the players will have to pay Social Security. And so will the University. The fallout will be endless. Doesn't all this make them professional athletes, ineligible to participate in college sports?

Isn't Mississippi a right-to-work state? Probably never happen there.
 
Sep 1, 2011
2,498
208
63
Texas is so anti union, I wonder what a state like that would do...

same for most states in the South. Personally I think it would affect giving to athletics because of politics...
 

121Josey

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2012
7,503
0
0
Good summary from Clay Travis. Apparently the tax angle is still up in the air:

His best line: "It's hard to know, exactly."

Under his reasoning in no. 4, anyone who receives any form of compensation from the university cannot be deemed a student. Universities don't need a (legitimate) reason to offer a student a scholarship. I, the business major, once received a scholarship to take an ag class and the class "magically" failed to make. The scholarship made though.
 

karlchilders.sixpack

All-Conference
Jun 5, 2008
19,998
3,990
113
Seems to me Georgia ...UG... Brothere'd up on this deal

When it first surfaced.

The fans will be the ones to kill it or support it,
I know my path.
 

xxxWalkTheDawg

Redshirt
Oct 21, 2005
4,262
0
0
The great thing about the government is

Not to mention, the upper tiers of the union org will have generous salaries paid via mandatory dues.


The NLRB is full of morons.

The department of the treasury and the department of labor can rule two different ways.
 

jakldawg

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
4,374
0
36
Another thing about #4 (which I didn't see mentioned elsewhere) is that the term "Student Athlete" was invented by the NCAA in the 1950's to deny workman's comp benefits to the widow of a college student who died from a football-related injury (they never mention that in their feel-good commercials they run endlessly during March madness).
Here's the cut-and-paste from this Atlantic article (it's loooooong).
“We crafted the term student-athlete,” Walter Byers himself wrote, “and soon it was embedded in all NCAA rules and interpretations.” The term came into play in the 1950s, when the widow of Ray Dennison, who had died from a head injury received while playing football in Colorado for the Fort Lewis A&M Aggies, filed for workmen’s-compensation death benefits. Did his football scholarship make the fatal collision a “work-related” accident? Was he a school employee, like his peers who worked part-time as teaching assistants and bookstore cashiers? Or was he a fluke victim of extracurricular pursuits? Given the hundreds of incapacitating injuries to college athletes each year, the answers to these questions had enormous consequences. The Colorado Supreme Court ultimately agreed with the school’s contention that he was not eligible for benefits, since the college was “not in the football business.”
The term student-athlete was deliberately ambiguous. College players were not students at play (which might understate their athletic obligations), nor were they just athletes in college (which might imply they were professionals). That they were high-performance athletes meant they could be forgiven for not meeting the academic standards of their peers; that they were students meant they did not have to be compensated, ever, for anything more than the cost of their studies. Student-athlete became the NCAA’s signature term, repeated constantly in and out of courtrooms.