C
Curly Bill
Guest
is that Alabama will dominate. They don't lose too much and the guys they do lose, they just move the next 5 star into that spot. Arenas will be the biggest hit.
I have a theory why Orgeron would not keep Rishaw around and Nutt will. Because Orgeron is a hard working recruiter who would be able to replace him and Nutt is taking the easy way out and keeping him around.RebelBruiser said:SoxFan343 said:but he does have a ton of physical ability.
He doesn't like not starting. Next season he shouldn't have to worry about that too much.
If Orgeron were still around, Rishaw would probably be gone already. Fortunately, Nutt understands his depth chart and has given Rishaw some extra leash given the state of our OL for 2010. We have some quality young OL on the team, but I don't expect to see most of them ready until 2011.
Big D said:I have a theory why Orgeron would not keep Rishaw around and Nutt will. Because Orgeron is a hard working recruiter who would be able to replace him and Nutt is taking the easy way out and keeping him around.RebelBruiser said:SoxFan343 said:but he does have a ton of physical ability.
He doesn't like not starting. Next season he shouldn't have to worry about that too much.
If Orgeron were still around, Rishaw would probably be gone already. Fortunately, Nutt understands his depth chart and has given Rishaw some extra leash given the state of our OL for 2010. We have some quality young OL on the team, but I don't expect to see most of them ready until 2011.
8Dog said:that he would have walked at OM before taking a scholarship with us. That's just what people say.
We desperately need to get better on kickoffs.
What I posted was just a theory.RebelBruiser said:Big D said:I have a theory why Orgeron would not keep Rishaw around and Nutt will. Because Orgeron is a hard working recruiter who would be able to replace him and Nutt is taking the easy way out and keeping him around.RebelBruiser said:SoxFan343 said:but he does have a ton of physical ability.
He doesn't like not starting. Next season he shouldn't have to worry about that too much.
If Orgeron were still around, Rishaw would probably be gone already. Fortunately, Nutt understands his depth chart and has given Rishaw some extra leash given the state of our OL for 2010. We have some quality young OL on the team, but I don't expect to see most of them ready until 2011.
No, it's just that Orgeron didn't understand that you can't kick off your entire team and still win football games. In 2006 he kicked off the only two LBs we had that would be returning with experience for 2007. Of course, in 2007, our LBs were a big weakness on the team, and that contributed to our defense being one of the worst in the league, which played a big role in us being 0-8.
Even Urban Meyer, the uber-recruiter, understands his depth chart when passing out discipline. Lane Kiffin showed the same when he kicked off Richardson and that other kid but kept Janzen Jackson. Jackson was the best of the 3 players involved, and the other 2 took the wrap so that Kiffin could keep the one he needed most.
DawgatAuburn said:Bruiser to the rescue! What a crock. You aren't looking forward to sucking any more than any other fan of any other team would. I can assure you that sucking is no fun, having just emerged from an eight year stretch of unparalleled sucking. You won't be able to "watch the future" because you will be so pissed off at how bad the present is. Now, I doubt that you suck as much next year as we did for most of the 00s, but I will be honest for a moment: I hope you do.RebelBruiser said:We're definitely going to be rebuilding next year, but <span style="font-weight: bold;">I'm looking forward to it. We'll get to watch the future, and I feel like we have some good
young athletes that will get their chance next year.</span>
Big D said:What I posted was just a theory.RebelBruiser said:Big D said:I have a theory why Orgeron would not keep Rishaw around and Nutt will. Because Orgeron is a hard working recruiter who would be able to replace him and Nutt is taking the easy way out and keeping him around.RebelBruiser said:SoxFan343 said:but he does have a ton of physical ability.
He doesn't like not starting. Next season he shouldn't have to worry about that too much.
If Orgeron were still around, Rishaw would probably be gone already. Fortunately, Nutt understands his depth chart and has given Rishaw some extra leash given the state of our OL for 2010. We have some quality young OL on the team, but I don't expect to see most of them ready until 2011.
No, it's just that Orgeron didn't understand that you can't kick off your entire team and still win football games. In 2006 he kicked off the only two LBs we had that would be returning with experience for 2007. Of course, in 2007, our LBs were a big weakness on the team, and that contributed to our defense being one of the worst in the league, which played a big role in us being 0-8.
Even Urban Meyer, the uber-recruiter, understands his depth chart when passing out discipline. Lane Kiffin showed the same when he kicked off Richardson and that other kid but kept Janzen Jackson. Jackson was the best of the 3 players involved, and the other 2 took the wrap so that Kiffin could keep the one he needed most.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">I think every one of your games is winnable except for Alabama. I think we are in a beginning of parody in the SEC for a few years except for Alabama. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> The West will be bunched up with everyone else playing for second place. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>I think if not this year but starting next year, Alabama will win three out of the next four BCS championships. Tebow is gone and next year Florida will not be the same.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> The SEC east could be up for grabs and South Carolina could be the big dogs next year over on that side.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> The east is lining up good for someone just like the West lined up for State in 98.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> But Bama is the team to beat in the SEC and will be for a while.</p>SoxFan343 said:and I still think we win six or seven games.
I think we beat Vandy, Jacksonville St., Tulane, and LA-Lafayette for sure. That's four wins.
Out of Fresno, UK, State, Auburn, Arkansas, Tennessee we winn two or three. That's six or seven wins.
It's too early to do too much guess work on this anyway. There are still a lot of questions. If you guys don't sign Newton, how good is your offense? How good is Newton anyway? Todd is leaving Auburn, who plays QB? Does Mallett go pro? What the crap does Tennessee do in the first place? They are looking at starting a true freshman QB according to a lot of UT fans I know. Can Snead bounce back? How bad is our secondary going to be?