NYTimes retracts its "17 intelligence agencies" canard which "journalists" have spread since Oct2016

[WVU82_rivals]

http://archive.is/BHEwu

Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[dave]

Think about how many times liberal morons repeated that lie.

 

[American Fabius]

Republicans Slam President Trump 'This Isn't Normal'

Several Republicans in Congress called out President Trump on Thursday for a series of tweets they described as "beneath the dignity of your office."

http://time.com/4839060/donald-trump-republican-senators-mika-brzezinski-tweet/

 

[WVU82_rivals]

don't mess with the Trump...

didn't cnn just learn this ?

and the media is stepping right back in the ****...

 

[PriddyBoy]

Think about how many times liberal morons repeated that lie.

They will continue to repeat it no matter how often they are corrected.

"It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see." - Henry David Thoreau

 

[TarHeelEer]

They will continue to repeat it no matter how often they are corrected.

"It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see." - Henry David Thoreau

Still fake news. They didn't even look at the server and relied on a third party to assess.

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Think about how many times liberal morons repeated that lie.

@bamaEER
@countryroads89
@Keyser76
@MountaineerWV
@Boomboom521

I bet 2007 has something coming for a couple of these folks.

 

[wvu2007]

@bamaEER
@countryroads89
@Keyser76
@MountaineerWV
@Boomboom521

I bet 2007 has something coming for a couple of these folks.

See the "Who would Putin prefer as president" thread.

 

[PriddyBoy]

Still fake news. They didn't even look at the server and relied on a third party to assess.

True, but truth has nothing to do with it. I still contend the left with repeat "17" and probably throw UNICEF in there as well.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

lol

 

[Boomboom521]

I never gave a flip about the number 17, but I did however say that the IC agreed on Russian attempts to influence the election. Is that not true now?

 

[dave]

I never gave a flip about the number 17, but I did however say that the IC agreed on Russian attempts to influence the election. Is that not true now?

I agree the number means little. I just remember when I first saw that teport and I thought 17 was ridiculous. I said at the time it had to be bogus. It just follows the reporting of late. Why say there were 4 confirmations when you can say 17. Hell why not say seventy bajillionzillion.

 

[Boomboom521]

I agree the number means little. I just remember when I first saw that teport and I thought 17 was ridiculous. I said at the time it had to be bogus. It just follows the reporting of late. Why say there were 4 confirmations when you can say 17. Hell why not say seventy bajillionzillion.

Yeah....why even put a number out there that can be disputed? Foolishness

 

[Mntneer]

I said all along it was ********. We don't have that many "intelligence" agencies.

Only a few matter.