I think you just made triple B's pointI can't get over it until it isn't true anymore. And we have comparable talent to Vandy, and we beat our own ***, not Vandy.
I think you just made triple B's pointI can't get over it until it isn't true anymore. And we have comparable talent to Vandy, and we beat our own ***, not Vandy.
EKU- overlooked our opponentTalent? Eastern? Vandy? We suck in the worst SEC I've seen in a very long time.
Come on man.
I think you just made triple B's pointI can't get over it until it isn't true anymore. And we have comparable talent to Vandy, and we beat our own ***, not Vandy.
I agreed that Vandy we are comparable and it wasn't a talent issue. But AU,UGA, UT, and MSU was definitely a talent issue.I think you just made triple B's point
EKU- overlooked our opponent
Vandy- had equal talent, beat our selves more that Vandy beat us.
If people can't see that talent is an issue, then I don't know wha to say.
I have said many times that I think Stoops has to do some things better. But, I also think that with more talent we could have about 3 more wins right now.Talent is an issue for lots of our opponents, but it's not going to solve all of Stoops issues. You manage ANY team, in any league, at any level in the manner that Stoops does, and you will suck. I don't care who you've got.
To a degree I see your point and agree in part,however with the MSU,UT,UGA and now Vandy games we fall so far off the wagon as to how we should be able to compete that talent(or lack thereof) doesn't explain what we see on the field.South Carolina and North Texas competed better than we did vs UT,we competed with UGA decently minus a couple of bonehead coaching decisions and the Vandy game I don't know where to start,let's just say that we are at least 2 touchdowns better than they are. I want Stoops to succeed as much as anyone but over the past month he has made coaching nistakes that a rookie high school coach might not make.I agreed that Vandy we are comparable and it wasn't a talent issue. But AU,UGA, UT, and MSU was definitely a talent issue.
And realistically, Mizzou, UF, and USC have more talent. We beat two of those and could have beaten the other. We also had a very good chance at Auburn. So why isn't Stoops getting props for those games for playing above their talent level?
In year three of Brooks we lost 49-0 and finished 3-8.The SEC east is a joke compared to its historical mean average. We've blown as good of a chance as we can expect to get.
This season,and some of the mistakes you've seen, are a failure. That can't be denied. Not all losses are the same when building and you can see that.
There were seasons when Brooks was building that we went toe-to-toe with national championship, and contending, teams and came out on the very short end. (See Alabama and Auburn games)
The previous 3 curb stompings, and this most recent s**t the bed performance, have been alarming.
This year three is a little different.In year three of Brooks we lost 49-0 and finished 3-8.
I agree that there was more at play than talent in those games. But talent is the biggest thing. I could also argue that the lack of talent makes the staff do things that they normally wouldn't trying to overcome the talent deficiencies. Clock management not included.To a degree I see your point and agree in part,however with the MSU,UT,UGA and now Vandy games we fall so far off the wagon as to how we should be able to compete that talent(or lack thereof) doesn't explain what we see on the field.South Carolina and North Texas competed better than we did vs UT,we competed with UGA decently minus a couple of bonehead coaching decisions and the Vandy game I don't know where to start,let's just say that we are at least 2 touchdowns better than they are. I want Stoops to succeed as much as anyone but over the past month he has made coaching nistakes that a rookie high school coach might not make.
Joker...Is that you??Fire Dawson now. Get therapy. Try to save the locker room and the recruiting class
Take the team to a movie, the trampoline place or something fun. Quit being an *** (appears that way)
This year three is a little different.
You people can undervalue the insignificance of probation and over value the "damage" of Joker all you want but it isn't reality.
Anyone with eyes can tell Brooks was a better manager and didn't beat himself often. He was on par as a football mind with anyone in conference. Please save me the overall record excuse too. He took over an Oregon program that was historically dismal. They do t name stadiums after people who suck.
I wish the financial commitments we are making to football now regarding facilities and staff wages were made during Brooks tenure.
If so he could have hired some recruiting help and he would have stayed long enough to establish a winning culture. Maybe not championship culture, but winning. He could have got us to that occasional special season (10+) and 7/8 win average seasons.
What you have watched is horrible and comparisons don't change that.
He didn't inherit a good situation, but also didn't do any better than his predecessor with it.If you don't think that Joker left a mess you are crazy. Just because it wasn't called probation doesn't mean it was the equivalent. Joker was beyond bad. The roster was beyond bad. Who did Stoops inherit that was halfway descent? Bud and Avery Williamson are all that I can remember.
Yes he has. Joker went down every year. To this point, Stoops has went up every year.He didn't inherit a good situation, but also didn't do any better than his predecessor with it.
I never understand how people can agree one guy didn't do well enough, yet expect nothing more out of who is hired to do a better job.
We did this with Tubby and BCG too. We thought Tubby didn't get it done and spent a season and a half making excuses for the guy brought in to "improve" the situation.
Stoops hasn't accomplished anything. He has made a bunch of tactical mistakes and hasn't shown to be any better of a football mind than who he replaced.
Adding Pelini would be tremendous. Let's have two hot heads trying to run the defense together. Sounds like the best plan out there.
Not this year. We're 4-6 and actually have performed worse than we performed last year. In all probability, we either finish with 5 or 6 wins this regular season, and I would argue that a 2015 5 and 7 is worse than last year's 5 and 7, considering that last year we had a tougher schedule. Actually, if we do manage 6 wins, it's a better season in the books than last year, but I wouldn't say that it's a better team than last year's team. If we get to 6 wins, the difference will be a win against a mediocre Louisville team, in Lexington, when last year we lost to a fairly good Louisville team, in Louisville.Yes he has. Joker went down every year. To this point, Stoops has went up every year.
You may have seen an improvement in recruiting but you haven't seen any improvement in coaching from the Joker era yet to date.Yes he has. Joker went down every year. To this point, Stoops has went up every year.
I think it is seeing how we replaced an OC, and lost some playmakers on offense and two NFL guys on defense. So even if we finish 5-7, we haven't regressed, which again is better than Joker. I think and hope we finish 6-6 though.Not this year. We're 4-6 and actually have performed worse than we performed last year. In all probability, we either finish with 5 or 6 wins this regular season, and I would argue that a 2015 5 and 7 is worse than last year's 5 and 7, considering that last year we had a tougher schedule. Actually, if we do manage 6 wins, it's a better season in the books than last year, but I wouldn't say that it's a better team than last year's team. If we get to 6 wins, the difference will be a win against a mediocre Louisville team, in Lexington, when last year we lost to a fairly good Louisville team, in Louisville.
So Stoops is going up in wins and Joker went down in wins and the coaching hasn't been better? So are you saying that the talent is important then sense you admit that Stoops has brought in more talent? If so, then you must also agree that losing to UT, UGA, UF, AU, and MSU wasn't Stoop's fault then because they have so much more talent. You must also have to give credit to him for beating more talented teams in Mizzouri and USC.You may have seen an improvement in recruiting but you haven't seen any improvement in coaching from the Joker area yet to date.
The recruiting will start to fall off too. The new staff buzz will go away now and our negativity will play a large part in that.
You argue like a fool.So Stoops is going up in wins and Joker went down in wins and the coaching hasn't been better? So are you saying that the talent is important then sense you admit that Stoops has brought in more talent? If so, then you must also agree that losing to UT, UGA, UF, AU, and MSU wasn't Stoop's fault then because they have so much more talent. You must also have to give credit to him for beating more talented teams in Mizzouri and USC.
So, you agree that recruiting is one of the things he could do better?I have said many times that I think Stoops has to do some things better. But, I also think that with more talent we could have about 3 more wins right now.
Recruiting could always get better, unless you are Alabama who has number 1 classes every year. Am I saying that the level he is recruiting is all his fault? No. I am saying though, that he has recruited better than anyone in our history, so he is taking the right steps to get the talent. You have to start somewhere. He wasn't going to magically come in and get top 10 classes. The classes he has pulled in have been incredible compared to what we are used to.So, you agree that recruiting is one of the things he could do better?
That is so weak, asking yourself easy, rhetorical questions. Bottom line, is he recruiting to YOUR satisfaction? Don't dodge the question THIS TIME. Your answer will tell a lot about what kind of results you are willing to accept.Recruiting could always get better, unless you are Alabama who has number 1 classes every year. Am I saying that the level he is recruiting is all his fault? No. I am saying though, that he has recruited better than anyone in our history, so he is taking the right steps to get the talent. You have to start somewhere. He wasn't going to magically come in and get top 10 classes. The classes he has pulled in have been incredible compared to what we are used to.
You argue like a fool.
Believe what you will and see what you can convince yourself of. What you've watched isn't any better of a coaching and managing job than what we had before. Stupidity wasn't good enough then and it shouldn't be accepted now.
Recruiting will suffer soon enough and all things will be equal for you.
Sure it is. The records are similar if not identical. The only difference is the initial trend, which seems to be slowing and reaching equlibrium. It's a strong argument either way, but you don't have enough evidence to claim his argument is false.Tell me where I am wrong? What makes someone look like a fool is to argue with someone without evidence. I gave you my evidence and you respond my calling me a fool and saying wait and see. If you are right, then why do I have to wait and see? You state your opinion like it is fact. The fact is, you said Stoops hasn't done any better than Joker. That is simply not true according to the results.
My evidence will probably be replayed at sometime this week on the SEC network.Tell me where I am wrong? What makes someone look like a fool is to argue with someone without evidence. I gave you my evidence and you respond my calling me a fool and saying wait and see. If you are right, then why do I have to wait and see? You state your opinion like it is fact. The fact is, you said Stoops hasn't done any better than Joker. That is simply not true according to the results.
Notice I said, "until this point" it has been better. And it has. He is acting like he knows the future.Sure it is. The records are similar if not identical. The only difference is the initial trend, which seems to be slowing and reaching equlibrium. It's a strong argument either way, but you don't have enough evidence to claim his argument is false.
That's because the warning signs are obvious for those not so wrapped up in defending Stoops that they can see it.Notice I said, "until this point" it has been better. And it has. He is acting like he knows the future.
Nope..Wrong again. If you weren't so caught up with your agenda to have him fired, you would read where I have said multiple times that Stoops needs to change some things and get better at others. And again, mistakes aren't signs that you can't accomplish something. Do you know how many coaches would be out of a job if in their first three years as a head coach they didn't produce to the fans expectations? All but about .1 percent of them. Go look at Saban in his first year at Michigan State. Look at Beamer.That's because the warning signs are obvious for those not so wrapped up in defending Stoops that they can see it.
See, you're not paying attention. I'm not advocating he be fired.Nope..Wrong again. If you weren't so caught up with your agenda to have him fired, you would read where I have said multiple times that Stoops needs to change some things and get better at others. And again, mistakes aren't signs that you can't accomplish something. Do you know how many coaches would be out of a job if in their first three years as a head coach they didn't produce to the fans expectations? All but about .1 percent of them. Go look at Saban in his first year at Michigan State. Look at Beamer.
I too, hate to fire a guy after 1 yr but if Stoops truly feels that Dawson is an issue its better to cut him loose now than go through another yr and risk being fired yourself or pushed further onto the hot seat before making a change. This goes for any member of the staff.