Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="eerdoc" data-source="post: 131969712" data-attributes="member: 1071764">If the final sentence becomes the factual scenario then, the TWO individuals MOST ACCOUNTABLE occupy positions called ATHLETIC DIRECTOR and UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT. It is the job of the former to do that which the name implies. To allow the described scenario to continue for three years is, in my lengthy experience of over 50&nbsp; years dealing with the interviewing, hiring, evaluating, and&nbsp; necessary termination of several dozen individuals would constitute absolute evidence of mismanagement and incompetence. Most of these were trained professional scientists with as much as multiple decades of pertinent experience in their field. The remainder were generally individuals with extensive either of lesser or of non scientific nature.Were this individual to be allowed to continue in a job, quite obviously beyod&nbsp; his competency, falls on the shoulders of and demonstrates additional incompetency&nbsp; in the form of the President. Both should, at this point,&nbsp; either should have or&nbsp; in the process of being removed&nbsp; by personal action or by the appropriate termination procedure by higher powers that be for gross incompetence causing grave dangers in prescribed ways to the University. The decision to continue as HC does not lie within the perview of the current occupant and is, I am comfident, subject to operational characteristics detailed within his contract. I am sure some of our recent history can easily be characterized as NOT MEETING contract detail.Time will tell who will do what and when!!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="eerdoc, post: 131969712, member: 1071764"] If the final sentence becomes the factual scenario then, the TWO individuals MOST ACCOUNTABLE occupy positions called ATHLETIC DIRECTOR and UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT. It is the job of the former to do that which the name implies. To allow the described scenario to continue for three years is, in my lengthy experience of over 50 years dealing with the interviewing, hiring, evaluating, and necessary termination of several dozen individuals would constitute absolute evidence of mismanagement and incompetence. Most of these were trained professional scientists with as much as multiple decades of pertinent experience in their field. The remainder were generally individuals with extensive either of lesser or of non scientific nature. Were this individual to be allowed to continue in a job, quite obviously beyod his competency, falls on the shoulders of and demonstrates additional incompetency in the form of the President. Both should, at this point, either should have or in the process of being removed by personal action or by the appropriate termination procedure by higher powers that be for gross incompetence causing grave dangers in prescribed ways to the University. The decision to continue as HC does not lie within the perview of the current occupant and is, I am comfident, subject to operational characteristics detailed within his contract. I am sure some of our recent history can easily be characterized as NOT MEETING contract detail. Time will tell who will do what and when!! [/QUOTE]

Name