"Better hitting" is relative. Y'all are probably the best hitting team of the 8 on a normal day, but in TD Ameritrade against elite pitching, y'all lose the advantage. UVA looked much better equipped and I wouldn't be surprised if a few of the others are as well.
You're right though. Y'all need TCU to beat UVA. Not sure if UVA would pitch Kirby again whenever y'all would play your 3rd game, but you'd definitely see him if y'all have to beat Tech and TCU first.
I don't believe TD Ameritrade works against our offense really.
The only hitter we have in our order that relies heavily on power for production is Orvis. Our next best power threats (Allen, Anderson, Bousfield) are all line drive/gap type hitters that just happen to lift a ball on occasion.
If anything, with our outfield speed and a pitching staff that doesn't walk a lot of people, I would say we are a team that should do well in a large park.
However, I do agree that our slight advantage on offense is negated by the pitching. I think it has less to do with the park though and more to do with the fact that most of the teams left have elite pitching, and therefore, these games are going to be lower scoring. We'll see if we can advance to later in the week if getting past some of these aces up front allows our bats to make a dent (pun intended) on the field.
On UVA, I'm not sure how they'll handle their pitching. I've heard that even their No. 4 guy is pretty special, so if they go through the winner's bracket, they may stick with a 4 man rotation and pitch the 4 guy if they get to the "if necessary" game. That's the tricky part.
If you're in that spot, do you bring back your ace on 5 days rest in order to try to give it your best shot at making the finals? If you do, then the best case scenario for that ace is to have to pitch on only 3 days rest in Game 3 of the finals, so you risk not even being able to throw your ace in the championship series.