Open Practice Today

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
47,054
86,039
113
The ball travels a long way from his catch. Tends to drop and then arc it to his pocket. There’s a lot of movement. It’s like the polar opposite of Noah. Watch Trent catch. It’s damned near in his pocket immediately on every catch. He uses his body to build the height of his pocket. Now if he could just make a damned shot. I’m convinced Trent’s problems are the same reason I could make a damned 3-6’ putt for par when it mattered. 6” space between the ears. Hawthorne has bigger issues, but TBF, I can’t imagine him being super high on the list of dudes we want hoisting 3s.
That’s what I mean, exactly.
 

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
47,054
86,039
113
What you say about the value of a quick high release is true but I don't personally think any real judgement about his ability to release it quick enough should be derived from watching him shoot one wide open three in practice. You could of course be correct but I wouldn't be concerned just yet based off of this.
I’m not really concerned about it just something I noticed in those clips. His gaining weight and strength is probably the biggest factor in his playing time this year and success in the future. Hopefully like Tayshaun it won’t matter that much.
 

SenseMaker_Cats

All-American
Jul 3, 2025
1,980
6,033
113
I’m not really concerned about it just something I noticed in those clips. His gaining weight and strength is probably the biggest factor in his playing time this year and success in the future. Hopefully like Tayshaun it won’t matter that much.
I see what you’re saying but that’s just part of “gathering” the ball. Just make wide open looks. If he could hit the type shots MM takes, he wouldn’t have sat last year. Again, just hit the open looks, those are the type he’ll be taking.

90+% of college players only shoot open threes. Very few can just catch and rise and fire(Gus Johnson) over defenders. Consistently anyway.
 

Eagles_Ball_69

All-American
Dec 19, 2003
4,540
6,072
82
That’s a huge if though. I’d like Kohler as insurance and he can play 4
Totally agree. I think Mitchell provides a bit of the same. But yeah, if Franck is on the shelf I’d sure rather have Kohler or Mitchell to spot some 5 minutes over Potter. Potter playing any minutes that matter just can’t be a good thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

Eagles_Ball_69

All-American
Dec 19, 2003
4,540
6,072
82
Kohler would be the starting 4, and I agree that Big Frank will be the backup 5, but I think Kohler plays backup minutes at 5 come tournament time when the rotation shrinks. He is the better player. Would love to have him
I think it depends a little on who is out there with him. Kohler isn’t a rim protector at all. Say N’Diaye proves to be long and athletic and capable of playing and protecting the rim a bit…I can see it. But a Kohler/McBride combo would just get hammered in the lane. But I TOTALLY agree, having Kohler (or even Mitchell) give you some flexibility in the rotation. Never a bad thing.
 

Eagles_Ball_69

All-American
Dec 19, 2003
4,540
6,072
82
I see what you’re saying but that’s just part of “gathering” the ball. Just make wide open looks. If he could hit the type shots MM takes, he wouldn’t have sat last year. Again, just hit the open looks, those are the type he’ll be taking.

90+% of college players only shoot open threes. Very few can just catch and rise and fire(Gus Johnson) over defenders. Consistently anyway.
Agreed…but time to gather determines just how “open” you are. His shots are much less open by the time he gets it released. Closeouts come fast. But yeah, not many dudes catching off a downscreen and catching and shooting.

Bonus point for Gus reference. Nothing better than Gus on the mic in a close first or second round NCAAT game. You sent me down a 20 minute rabbit hole. Lol I hate that he’s no longer with CBS.

 

ScWildcat3

All-Conference
Sep 27, 2005
775
1,166
93
Totally agree. I think Mitchell provides a bit of the same. But yeah, if Franck is on the shelf I’d sure rather have Kohler or Mitchell to spot some 5 minutes over Potter. Potter playing any minutes that matter just can’t be a good thing.
Another problem is Mitchell signed an exhibit 10 and Kohler didn’t.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
43,036
65,524
113
I don’t plan to read the opinions of the trial courts and I have no experience with anti trust law, but it seems the judge thinks that a decision to change the rules of eligibility after your eligibility expired under the old rules did you harm, but does not think the expiration of a portal entry rule prior to the change in the eligibility rule does you harm. You could not have known the eligibility rule would be changed but you still should have entered the portal??? Okay. 🤦‍♂️
 

ThreeDogNight2

Sophomore
Jul 24, 2026
167
182
43
I don’t plan to read the opinions of the trial courts and I have no experience with anti trust law, but it seems the judge thinks that a decision to change the rules of eligibility after your eligibility expired under the old rules did you harm, but does not think the expiration of a portal entry rule prior to the change in the eligibility rule does you harm. You could not have known the eligibility rule would be changed but you still should have entered the portal??? Okay. 🤦‍♂️
Which understood would mean like Keyshawn hall only?

I think some higher court needs to just hurry up and rule on this and like clarify transfer portal stuff
 

UKgrad22

All-Conference
Apr 9, 2026
681
1,783
93
My understanding (probably the same as all of you) is that the Colorado judge that ruled a blanket 5th year for 2022 grads (HS) only gave eligibility, not the ability to transfer. Therefore players would have had to have entered the portal prior to it closing in April/May (can’t remember which). Hall entered and should have no issues, Kohler would have to gain transfer clearance and prove he didn’t sign the 10-day. Mitchell will fight the uphill battle because he did sign an exhibit 10 and didn’t enter portal. A lot can change (and hopefully will), but as of now Hall is the only one of the 3 that can immediately transfer with no issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThreeDogNight2

ScWildcat3

All-Conference
Sep 27, 2005
775
1,166
93
My understanding (probably the same as all of you) is that the Colorado judge that ruled a blanket 5th year for 2022 grads (HS) only gave eligibility, not the ability to transfer. Therefore players would have had to have entered the portal prior to it closing in April/May (can’t remember which). Hall entered and should have no issues, Kohler would have to gain transfer clearance and prove he didn’t sign the 10-day. Mitchell will fight the uphill battle because he did sign an exhibit 10 and didn’t enter portal. A lot can change (and hopefully will), but as of now Hall is the only one of the 3 that can immediately transfer with no issues.
They either all will be eligible or none. NCAA hasn’t won any of these injunctions really
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThreeDogNight2

The Ganner

All-Conference
Nov 21, 2009
388
1,027
93
I don’t understand why this team’s weaknesses are considered to be rebounding and defense. This is a big roster, we should be terrorizing the rim and offensive players.
It's the forwards. Momcilovic is a poor defender and rebounder for his size/position. McBride was also a pretty mediocre rebounder for a 4, and not known as a plus defender. Kam is an alright defender, not-great rebounder. Hawthorne is an unknown. N'Diaye was a solid rebounder in Europe and has the length and athleticism to be a good defender, but one of the biggest criticisms of him is instincts/decision making/positioning.
 
Aug 23, 2024
2,892
6,280
113
Was responding to someone that said Kohler would also be the backup 5. He won’t if Franck is healthy.

Now please return to your blind sheep name calling routine. It’s where you’re at your best.
You entire schtick is based on repeating something that is not true. Makes sense though since the truth makes a fool out of you at all times. This is just another example of your propensity to behave in a disingenuous manner.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UKCowboys

BBNinSCar

All-Conference
Apr 23, 2013
1,615
2,852
81
It's the forwards. Momcilovic is a poor defender and rebounder for his size/position. McBride was also a pretty mediocre rebounder for a 4, and not known as a plus defender. Kam is an alright defender, not-great rebounder. Hawthorne is an unknown. N'Diaye was a solid rebounder in Europe and has the length and athleticism to be a good defender, but one of the biggest criticisms of him is instincts/decision making/positioning.
Maybe we can rebound and defend better than expected. This is a big, athletic team.
 

UKCowboys

All-American
Oct 14, 2019
4,865
9,149
113
True, and that helps but defense and rebounding have a whole lot to do with instinct and effort
Right, but can you really say you've sat down and watched hours of individual and team defensive work by Zion, Wilkins, Momcilovic, McBride, Hawthorne, Kepnang, N'Diaye and Williams, none of whom played a minute for us last season? How can you make a judgement about what a team can't do before you have ever seen them play?
 

Im The Village Idiot

All-American
Sep 7, 2025
2,089
5,236
113
Right, but can you really say you've sat down and watched hours of individual and team defensive work by Zion, Wilkins, Momcilovic, McBride, Hawthorne, Kepnang, N'Diaye and Williams, none of whom played a minute for us last season? How can you make a judgement about what a team can't do before you have ever seen them play?
Because there are advanced metrics, personnel grades and insiders who have provided full scouting reports on these guys. You seem to take umbrage if someone has a negative projection on the team but you have no problem providing prognostications if they are glowing:


No question about it. We are a dark horse now IMO. Kohler would make our starting 5 as good as anyone in the nation(including Florida) and we would be a solid 10 deep

This is you saying Kentucky’s starting 5 is as good as anyone in the country. I get your general point here and I somewhat agree (still not better than Florida’s IMO). My question for you is this: How would you know it’s as good as anyone in the country? Have you extensively watched film for every starting 5 in the country or are you doing like the rest of us and relying on several factors to make that proclamation?

Rules for thee, not for me?
 

UKCowboys

All-American
Oct 14, 2019
4,865
9,149
113
Because there are advanced metrics, personnel grades and insiders who have provided full scouting reports on these guys. You seem to take umbrage if someone has a negative projection on the team but you have no problem providing prognostications if they are glowing:




This is you saying Kentucky’s starting 5 is as good as anyone in the country. I get your general point here and I somewhat agree (still not better than Florida’s IMO). My question for you is this: How would you know it’s as good as anyone in the country? Have you extensively watched film for every starting 5 in the country or are you doing like the rest of us and relying on several factors to make that proclamation?

Rules for thee, not for me?
How could you know they're not? You are pretty hypocritical fella. You bash me for actually wanting to see the team play before declaring them a poor defensive team and you post all your talk of "insiders" but those insiders don't know any more than anyone else. Its an opinion board and my opinion is that if we add Kohler we are as solid in the starting 5 as anyone including Florida.

Zoom Diallo - Boogie Fland
Alex Wilkins - Urban Klavzar
Milan Momcilovic - Thomas Haugh
Jaxon Kohler - Alex Condon
Malachi Moreno - Rueben Chinyelu

Now maybe that scares you to death, but it looks pretty damn even to me. And Florida the most talented team in the country. So forgive me if your metrics and insiders don't send me scurrying under the bed like a scared hamster
 

UKCowboys

All-American
Oct 14, 2019
4,865
9,149
113
Because there are advanced metrics, personnel grades and insiders who have provided full scouting reports on these guys. You seem to take umbrage if someone has a negative projection on the team but you have no problem providing prognostications if they are glowing:




This is you saying Kentucky’s starting 5 is as good as anyone in the country. I get your general point here and I somewhat agree (still not better than Florida’s IMO). My question for you is this: How would you know it’s as good as anyone in the country? Have you extensively watched film for every starting 5 in the country or are you doing like the rest of us and relying on several factors to make that proclamation?

Rules for thee, not for me?
Kettle meet Pot
 
KSR

Latest

  1. 01 KSR 2026 Kentucky Position Previews: Linebacker
  2. 02 KSR Class of 2028 prospect Tyson Linde commits to Kentucky
  3. 03 KSR KSR Today: Kentucky continues march to Labor Day weekend
  4. 04 KSR Lock in for Kentucky Football season with the KSR+ FALL CAMP SALE!
  5. 05 KSR 3 Lessons Learned from the First 3 Days of Kentucky Football Fall Camp