100% what the hell are they going to do if we ... win? Spend 15 minutes talking about how there is a 10 year old watching somewhere being inspired ... againI’ve got the pregame coverage on and am reminded why I usually skip it. I know it’s supposed to pump me up, but you can only hear the same platitudes so many times before it gets irritating. I don’t really care how it felt to the commentators to play in games of the past.
Wish they would bring on knowledgeable analysts to talk tactics and soccer stuff.
That's a Fox decision based on what they think casual fans want. I guarantee you those guys would rather talk tactics...I’ve got the pregame coverage on and am reminded why I usually skip it. I know it’s supposed to pump me up, but you can only hear the same platitudes so many times before it gets irritating. I don’t really care how it felt to the commentators to play in games of the past.
Wish they would bring on knowledgeable analysts to talk tactics and soccer stuff.
I think fans like tactics. It’s one of the reasons I like UM on the CFB Fox pregame. I see Athletic articles that do deeper dives into schemes get lots of good reviews.That's a Fox decision based on what they think casual fans want. I guarantee you those guys would rather talk tactics...
he wasn’t even tryingTotally uncovered. The US defender was lagging behind the whole play.
Same thought crossed my mind. It’s not like the passing is on target or the players are anticipating and being in position to receive so might as well just shoot the ball.Two times now, players not passing early enough. At the point they pass, they should just shoot instead. Nobody they were passing to was in any better a position to shoot.
Probably has a lot to do with it. But the network is wrong, as usual. These major networks make so many lame decisions, it’s lucky for them people are lazy and watch so much TV.That's a Fox decision based on what they think casual fans want. I guarantee you those guys would rather talk tactics...
Unfortunately 2 has been bad so far. Dumfries with the assist and running free looking more and more dangerous. Pulisic should've scored and doesn't contribute on d.This one is pretty straightforward to me 1) Can we successfully press de Jong without getting exposed? 2) Pulisic vs Dumfries - edit: I'm not just talking about Puli on O. What's GB's plan when Dumfries adds #s to attack? Is Antonee more conservative out of necessity?
Unfortunately offense looks similarly anemic this WC.Ahh jeez...just like Rutgers football, I wake up early, game already in progress, and we're already down a score.
Sounds like we need a “spread offense” as I referred to earlier in the threadTo score, we need combination play. For combination play to work, we need players away from the ball to move early so that we don’t have 6 players, with all their defenders, all too near the ball. It’s preventing the space needed to make runs or even set walls for wall passes.
Finally an commentator mentions it.Unfortunately 2 has been bad so far. Dumfries with the assist and running free looking more and more dangerous. Pulisic should've scored and doesn't contribute on d.
very static and passing has not been crisp...Ferreira has been bad...wish we had a real 9...Look at the inactivity of the US players around the ball (around the first attacker). That’s a big problem. Don’t know if it’s fatigue or what, but attacking shape and movement is way off from what is needed right now.
"Need to get the ball to our best players in space"Sounds like we need a “spread offense” as I referred to earlier in the thread![]()
The poor passing is, mostly, a result of poor support play, poor movement off the ball. Has left the first attacker with poor options as pressure is applied.very static and passing has not been crisp...Ferreira has been bad...wish we had a real 9...