OT: 2022 World Cup Thread

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,271
0
I’ve got the pregame coverage on and am reminded why I usually skip it. I know it’s supposed to pump me up, but you can only hear the same platitudes so many times before it gets irritating. I don’t really care how it felt to the commentators to play in games of the past.

Wish they would bring on knowledgeable analysts to talk tactics and soccer stuff.
 

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
I’ve got the pregame coverage on and am reminded why I usually skip it. I know it’s supposed to pump me up, but you can only hear the same platitudes so many times before it gets irritating. I don’t really care how it felt to the commentators to play in games of the past.

Wish they would bring on knowledgeable analysts to talk tactics and soccer stuff.
100% what the hell are they going to do if we ... win? Spend 15 minutes talking about how there is a 10 year old watching somewhere being inspired ... again 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: mildone_rivals

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
64,256
43,368
113
I’ve got the pregame coverage on and am reminded why I usually skip it. I know it’s supposed to pump me up, but you can only hear the same platitudes so many times before it gets irritating. I don’t really care how it felt to the commentators to play in games of the past.

Wish they would bring on knowledgeable analysts to talk tactics and soccer stuff.
That's a Fox decision based on what they think casual fans want. I guarantee you those guys would rather talk tactics...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doctor Worm
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
That's a Fox decision based on what they think casual fans want. I guarantee you those guys would rather talk tactics...
I think fans like tactics. It’s one of the reasons I like UM on the CFB Fox pregame. I see Athletic articles that do deeper dives into schemes get lots of good reviews.
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
Two times now, players not passing early enough. At the point they pass, they should just shoot instead. Nobody they were passing to was in any better a position to shoot.
Same thought crossed my mind. It’s not like the passing is on target or the players are anticipating and being in position to receive so might as well just shoot the ball.
 

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,271
0
That's a Fox decision based on what they think casual fans want. I guarantee you those guys would rather talk tactics...
Probably has a lot to do with it. But the network is wrong, as usual. These major networks make so many lame decisions, it’s lucky for them people are lazy and watch so much TV.
 

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,271
0
US players are making some fundamental mistakes in decision-making. Stuff they all know better than to do. I think they are feeling the pressure and their youth is hurting them a little with their lack of patience on the ball.

Also, Netherlands strategy is working well for them.
 

knightru

Senior
Dec 19, 2001
2,502
567
78
The 4-3-3 is not going to work against the way Holland is playing us.

We are also not doing ourselves any favors by passing too slowly.
 

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
This one is pretty straightforward to me 1) Can we successfully press de Jong without getting exposed? 2) Pulisic vs Dumfries - edit: I'm not just talking about Puli on O. What's GB's plan when Dumfries adds #s to attack? Is Antonee more conservative out of necessity?
Unfortunately 2 has been bad so far. Dumfries with the assist and running free looking more and more dangerous. Pulisic should've scored and doesn't contribute on d.
 

RU05

All-American
Jun 25, 2015
14,372
9,025
113
NED looks so much more dangerous when they get down low.

USA also seems to give up on plays a lot.
 

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,271
0
Look at the inactivity of the US players around the ball (around the first attacker). That’s a big problem. Don’t know if it’s fatigue or what, but attacking shape and movement is way off from what is needed right now.
 

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,271
0
To score, we need combination play. For combination play to work, we need players away from the ball to move early so that we don’t have 6 players, with all their defenders, all too near the ball. It’s preventing the space needed to make runs or even set walls for wall passes.
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
To score, we need combination play. For combination play to work, we need players away from the ball to move early so that we don’t have 6 players, with all their defenders, all too near the ball. It’s preventing the space needed to make runs or even set walls for wall passes.
Sounds like we need a “spread offense” as I referred to earlier in the thread 😂
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mildone_rivals

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
Unfortunately 2 has been bad so far. Dumfries with the assist and running free looking more and more dangerous. Pulisic should've scored and doesn't contribute on d.
Finally an commentator mentions it.
 

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
64,256
43,368
113
Look at the inactivity of the US players around the ball (around the first attacker). That’s a big problem. Don’t know if it’s fatigue or what, but attacking shape and movement is way off from what is needed right now.
very static and passing has not been crisp...Ferreira has been bad...wish we had a real 9...
 

MadRU

Heisman
Jul 26, 2001
37,092
19,113
98
Again final third killing us.

Ferreira dropping deep to help out, which is fine but need someone making runs in the box.