OT: Baseball Free Agents

TheC

Senior
May 29, 2001
18,660
802
62
But when you are coming off 67 wins, anything helps.
And there's the rub! We've spent the last four years in last place. This year its fourth place or bust! And I'm excited!!

Plus, my old high school teammate is now the manager!
 

TheC

Senior
May 29, 2001
18,660
802
62
I also am an avid reader and consumer of baseball news and the Machado is a cancer view is not new. My view of him as a player is reinforced by what I have seen of him on TV and in person over the course of several seasons.

Once again, I’ll reiterate there is a difference between being liked and being respected. A leader doesn’t have to be liked, but he has to be respected. Machado is not a leader and shouldn’t expect to be paid like one.
You do know its ok to not be an expert on everything.

Having an opinion is fine, but to treat everything you say as fact is kind of silly. Who wouldn't want Machado or Harper in their line-up if they could afford it? This whole discussion is insane.
 
Jun 1, 2014
4,774
292
70
I also am an avid reader and consumer of baseball news and the Machado is a cancer view is not new. My view of him as a player is reinforced by what I have seen of him on TV and in person over the course of several seasons.

Once again, I’ll reiterate there is a difference between being liked and being respected. A leader doesn’t have to be liked, but he has to be respected. Machado is not a leader and shouldn’t expect to be paid like one.

Except he is respected. And he'll be paid what the market deems he's worth
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
I'll say this: I have no personal or even knows-someone-who-knows-someone knowledge of Manny Machado or his characteristics or habits. I see only the little bit we see on TV plus whatever media has come out about him over the years. I'm *pretty* sure you also don't have any, but correct me if I'm wrong.

That’s correct as per my post just prior to this one. I also didn’t know Jay Cutler but I saw and read enough of him over the years to form an opinion of him as a player and a leader. I’d put Machado and Cutler in what I like to call the JEFF George category of player, million dollar talents with 5 cent hearts and character.
 
Jun 1, 2014
4,774
292
70
That’s correct as per my post just prior to this one. I also didn’t know Jay Cutler but I saw and read enough of him over the years to form an opinion of him as a player and a leader. I’d put Machado and Cutler in what I like to call the JEFF George category of player, million dollar talents with 5 cent hearts and character.

And you'd be wrong.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
You do know its ok to not be an expert on everything.

Having an opinion is fine, but to treat everything you say as fact is kind of silly. Who wouldn't want Machado or Harper in their line-up if they could afford it? This whole discussion is insane.

Who said I view everything I believe as fact? I have a strong opinion on the matter and I try to support it. When it comes to sports, I have a lot of strong opinions because I happen to be a sports fanatic. If I don’t have a strong opinion on the matter, I don’t chime in. There are many threads on this board that I don’t participate in.

Regarding your point on Machado and Harper, apparently most major league teams don’t want them on their teams for the price they want to be paid. That’s why no one has signed them. There are several teams that can “afford” to pay them that price, but don’t feel they are worth that price. If those guys were interested in playing for a short term, 15 mm per year contract, then I am sure they would find stronger demand. That’s quite a different proposition than what was being discussed on this thread.
 

Hungry Jack

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2008
36,357
1,908
67
And there's the rub! We've spent the last four years in last place. This year its fourth place or bust! And I'm excited!!

Plus, my old high school teammate is now the manager!
Wow. That's pretty cool.

It must be pretty hard for pitchers in that park. They have lots of young arms who looked pretty talented, but Great American seems like a launching pad.

I'm a Cardinal fan, and after watching Walt Jocketty take advantage of some buy low scenarios to get guys like Rolen, Edmonds, MacGwire, Woody Williams, Will Clark, and Larry Walker (and stumbling onto Pujols in the 13th round) into St. Louis, I was dubious his strategy could be replicated in Cincy.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
Except he is respected. And he'll be paid what the market deems he's worth

Finally you’ve said something we can agree on. He’ll be paid what the market deems he is worth. My guess is that number is nowhere near where he or his agent thought it would be.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,599
1,638
78
Finally you’ve said something we can agree on. He’ll be paid what the market deems he is worth. My guess is that number is nowhere near where he or his agent thought it would be.

And that's surprising because... ?
 

TheC

Senior
May 29, 2001
18,660
802
62
Wow. That's pretty cool.

It must be pretty hard for pitchers in that park. They have lots of young arms who looked pretty talented, but Great American seems like a launching pad.

I'm a Cardinal fan, and after watching Walt Jocketty take advantage of some buy low scenarios to get guys like Rolen, Edmonds, MacGwire, Woody Williams, Will Clark, and Larry Walker (and stumbling onto Pujols in the 13th round) into St. Louis, I was dubious his strategy could be replicated in Cincy.
I like you Jack, so I'm going to ignore your last paragraph.

The Reds haven't developed a good pitcher in a long time. Johnny Cueto is the only one in the past couple of decades. They do have a kid named Luis Castillo who they got from the Marlins that may be the next team ace, but its very much still TBD. Last year was his first, full season. We'll see how he emerges this year.

The Reds should have a fairly decent bullpen this year, though, so if they can find some starters that can fight their way through five innings each night, they might have the offense and bullpen to win a few games.

The problem remains that the they are in the same division with the Cubs who are now no longer a laughing stock (dammit!). And the Cards should probably be better this year (dammit! dammit!!). And the Brewers are good now too, though maybe they'll regress this year after the surprise that was this past season.
 

Hungry Jack

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2008
36,357
1,908
67
I like you Jack, so I'm going to ignore your last paragraph.

The Reds haven't developed a good pitcher in a long time. Johnny Cueto is the only one in the past couple of decades. They do have a kid named Luis Castillo who they got from the Marlins that may be the next team ace, but its very much still TBD. Last year was his first, full season. We'll see how he emerges this year.

The Reds should have a fairly decent bullpen this year, though, so if they can find some starters that can fight their way through five innings each night, they might have the offense and bullpen to win a few games.

The problem remains that the they are in the same division with the Cubs who are now no longer a laughing stock (dammit!). And the Cards should probably be better this year (dammit! dammit!!). And the Brewers are good now too, though maybe they'll regress this year after the surprise that was this past season.
Yeah. The NL Central is pretty solid. The Cards have some young talented arms, and maybe Goldschmidt pushes them through, but I still think the Cubs are tops. The Brewers overachieved last year, but are still a good team.

Hopefully the Reds don't bury themselves in April again. That was brutal.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,599
1,638
78
Not surprising to me. Surprising to anyone who believed the hype that Machado or Harper were 10 year, $300+mm type players. They are not.

Wouldn't be at all surprised if they end up in that ballpark (or even more) on an AAV basis. The sticking point seems to be length of the contract more than the dollar figure.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
Wouldn't be at all surprised if they end up in that ballpark (or even more) on an AAV basis. The sticking point seems to be length of the contract more than the dollar figure.

Big difference between a 5 year $150 million deal and a 10 year $300 million deal. This isn’t football, every single dollar of a baseball contract is guaranteed.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,599
1,638
78
Big difference between a 5 year $150 million deal and a 10 year $300 million deal. This isn’t football, every single dollar of a baseball contract is guaranteed.

Am I supposed to be shocked by this insight?

Thinking more like 7-8 years at $230-240 (as much as ~$33MM AAV) on the high end. Don't think teams want to commit high dollars to guys in their mid-30s after watching Pujols, Hayward, etc. turn into absolute albatrosses... but they will pay for "prime" years.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
Am I supposed to be shocked by this insight?

Thinking more like 7-8 years at $230-240 (as much as ~$33MM AAV) on the high end. Don't think teams want to commit high dollars to guys in their mid-30s after watching Pujols, Hayward, etc. turn into absolute albatrosses... but they will pay for "prime" years.
I don’t care if you are shocked or not. You implied that AAV is as relevant in baseball. It is not. Total contract size is what matters. I’ll be surprised if either of them signs a nine figure contract that starts with a 2.
 

willycat

Junior
Jan 11, 2005
21,448
318
0
If they are unwilling to sign Machado or Harper because this step would deprive them of the resources to sign their own players, isn’t this an indirect acknowledgement that they value those players more than Machado/Harper? In my view the answer is pretty clearly yes.
No, there is no salary limit in MLB.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,599
1,638
78
I don’t care if you are shocked or not. You implied that AAV is as relevant in baseball. It is not. Total contract size is what matters. I’ll be surprised if either of them signs a nine figure contract that starts with a 2.

Ok, man. “Player doesn’t get exactly the contract demanded by him and his agent” isn’t exactly ground-breaking.

So you’re saying best case for either is $199 in total value? I think I would take that bet.
 
Jun 1, 2014
4,774
292
70
Not surprising to me. Surprising to anyone who believed the hype that Machado or Harper were 10 year, $300+mm type players. They are not.

They aren't because of supply/demand and other economic factors. Not because they aren't "leaders" like you claim.
 
Jun 1, 2014
4,774
292
70
What a compelling arguement! I think I’ll keep trusting my judgement about character and leadership over yours. It has served me well over the years.

Your judgement is what you see based on TV. I am telling you you are wrong based on experience with people in the industry and have dissected this exact player's free agency to its most microscopic intricacy. I literally speak with agents, players, scouts and the GM OF THE ORGANIZATION IN CHICAGO TRYING TO SIGN HIM regularly.

So I will trust my judgement of his character and leadership over yours, which has next to no validity at all
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
Ok, man. “Player doesn’t get exactly the contract demanded by him and his agent” isn’t exactly ground-breaking.

So you’re saying best case for either is $199 in total value? I think I would take that bet.

I am saying that i don’t think Machado will get an offer worth $200mm or more and Harper won’t sign one that “only” starts with a two. Neither are worth it.
 
Jun 1, 2014
4,774
292
70
I am saying that i don’t think Machado will get an offer worth $200mm or more and Harper won’t sign one that “only” starts with a two. Neither are worth it.

Wrong again. Machado already has an offer north of $200MM, from the White Sox. 7 years, about 30MM AAV right now with plenty of room to budge should they need to
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
Wrong again. Machado already has an offer north of $200MM, from the White Sox. 7 years, about 30MM AAV right now with plenty of room to budge should they need to

Really? Then he should sign it ASAP before Reinsdorf comes to his senses. I heard the number is 7/$175mm and I am skeptical that Jerry would fork that kind of money over. Doesn’t really matter. As I said, the White Sox signing Machado for $175mm or $210mm would only be the latest evidence that Reinsdorf owns two of the worst run franchises in professional sports. heck, the Bulls game Felicio $32mm over 4 years and Jabari parker $20 MM per year to sit on the bench. Brilliant!
 
Last edited:
Jun 1, 2014
4,774
292
70
Really? Then he should sign it ASAP before Reinsdorf comes to his senses. I heard the number is 7/$175mm. Doesn’t really matter. As I said, the White Sox signing Machado for $175mm or $210mm would only be the latest evidence that Reinsdorf owns two of the worst run franchises in professional sports.

You heard that from Bruce Levine who got shot down by Rosenthal, Lozano, Passan and others. He is wrong and his source on that was garbage. Hahn himself was furious about that leak because it was a bad look for the organization

And again you're looking at this situation in black and white and spewing your opinion as fact. "Evidence that Reinsdorf owns 2 of the worst run franchises in professional sports."

You provided no evidence of how this signing is actually evidence, you just don't like Machado or Harper because of a false narrative you've developed from watching them play on TV. I provided *some* evidence as to why you're wrong, as much as I can on a public forum anyways, and you just keep going.

If you'd like more evidence to why you're wrong, I'll direct you to their Fangraphs pages.

The White Sox have about $15MM committed to payroll before arb deals next winter. They have the ability to absorb a $30MM AAV contract better than anyone in baseball right now sans maybe a team or two.
 

wildcatpn

Freshman
Oct 26, 2005
3,235
75
48
You heard that from Bruce Levine who got shot down by Rosenthal, Lozano, Passan and others. He is wrong and his source on that was garbage. Hahn himself was furious about that leak because it was a bad look for the organization

And again you're looking at this situation in black and white and spewing your opinion as fact. "Evidence that Reinsdorf owns 2 of the worst run franchises in professional sports."

You provided no evidence of how this signing is actually evidence, you just don't like Machado or Harper because of a false narrative you've developed from watching them play on TV. I provided *some* evidence as to why you're wrong, as much as I can on a public forum anyways, and you just keep going.

If you'd like more evidence to why you're wrong, I'll direct you to their Fangraphs pages.

The White Sox have about $15MM committed to payroll before arb deals next winter. They have the ability to absorb a $30MM AAV contract better than anyone in baseball right now sans maybe a team or two.
Stop wasting your time. He's never wrong about anything......ever.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
Stop wasting your time. He's never wrong about anything......ever.

Are we talking about facts or opinions? Neither side has any inside info so this is all based on opinions. How can my opinion be wrong? Should I change my opinion because a few people disagree with me? Sorry, I don’t form opinions casually and I don’t change them casually either.
 
Jun 1, 2014
4,774
292
70
Are we talking about facts or opinions? Neither side has any inside info so this is all based on opinions. How can my opinion be wrong? Should I change my opinion because a few people disagree with me? Sorry, I don’t form opinions casually and I don’t change them casually either.

Well.... this is just incorrect
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
You heard that from Bruce Levine who got shot down by Rosenthal, Lozano, Passan and others. He is wrong and his source on that was garbage. Hahn himself was furious about that leak because it was a bad look for the organization

And again you're looking at this situation in black and white and spewing your opinion as fact. "Evidence that Reinsdorf owns 2 of the worst run franchises in professional sports."

You provided no evidence of how this signing is actually evidence, you just don't like Machado or Harper because of a false narrative you've developed from watching them play on TV. I provided *some* evidence as to why you're wrong, as much as I can on a public forum anyways, and you just keep going.

If you'd like more evidence to why you're wrong, I'll direct you to their Fangraphs pages.

The White Sox have about $15MM committed to payroll before arb deals next winter. They have the ability to absorb a $30MM AAV contract better than anyone in baseball right now sans maybe a team or two.

Maybe you have a difficult time distinguishing facts from opinions. reinsdorf owning two of the worst franchises in professionals sports is an opinion. That’s an opinion that is not unique to me but it is still an opinion. I cited two terrible Bulls signings as factual evidence supporting that opinion but that doesn’t make my original statement a fact. I could cite many more factual examples of terrible management decisions for both the Sox and the Bulls that further support my opinion but it’s still an opinion. There are no amount of facts I could cite that support my opinion that would make it a fact. You have a different opinion and are entitled to it but you haven’t cited any facts to support your opinion and certainly not any facts that compel me to change my opinion. Right now the only indisputable fact is that neither Harper nor Machado have signed and spring training is on the cusp of starting. Infer from it what you want.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
You heard that from Bruce Levine who got shot down by Rosenthal, Lozano, Passan and others. He is wrong and his source on that was garbage. Hahn himself was furious about that leak because it was a bad look for the organization

And again you're looking at this situation in black and white and spewing your opinion as fact. "Evidence that Reinsdorf owns 2 of the worst run franchises in professional sports."

You provided no evidence of how this signing is actually evidence, you just don't like Machado or Harper because of a false narrative you've developed from watching them play on TV. I provided *some* evidence as to why you're wrong, as much as I can on a public forum anyways, and you just keep going.

If you'd like more evidence to why you're wrong, I'll direct you to their Fangraphs pages.

The White Sox have about $15MM committed to payroll before arb deals next winter. They have the ability to absorb a $30MM AAV contract better than anyone in baseball right now sans maybe a team or two.

I just got around to reading your last paragraph. I am not sure which I find more laughable. The implication that just because the White Sox have the payroll flexibility to pay either of those guys $30mm per year on along term contract, then that makes it the right thing to do from a business or baseball perspective. Or alternatively that just because the White Sox have the payroll flexibility to pay either of those guys $30mm per year, then that’s what Reinsdorf will actually do. Neither of those guys are worth that kind of money and I am pretty sure Reinsdorf knows it.