Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Bell Tolls for Thee" data-source="post: 131544840" data-attributes="member: 1812660">I think that had Bowden stayed he would not have created here what he did at FSU.&nbsp; Just like I'm sure had Belichik (sp?) stayed in Cleveland instead of being ousted to the Patriots he wouldn't have multiple Super Bowl rings.I can't speak for others, but I was not down on RR.&nbsp; I knew he was trying to make Nehlen pro style set of guys into a spread offense and thus had an atrocious first season. The guys weren't bad, just not to his style.&nbsp; But after watching the 2002 Miami and VT games with RR, it was apparent that he was onto something.&nbsp; I did think he let prima donna attitudes poison the 2003 and 2004 teams.&nbsp; Stewart on the other hand, I was skeptical from the get go due to his resume.&nbsp; The opening loss to ECU by scoring only 3 points with what he inherited reinforced that skepticism.&nbsp; Over the next 2 seasons he proved that he was just to stubborn to adapt.&nbsp; Especially not winning the Big East with a defense that gave up less than 13 points/game during league play and refusing to acknowledge that the offense was a problem.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Bell Tolls for Thee, post: 131544840, member: 1812660"] I think that had Bowden stayed he would not have created here what he did at FSU. Just like I'm sure had Belichik (sp?) stayed in Cleveland instead of being ousted to the Patriots he wouldn't have multiple Super Bowl rings. I can't speak for others, but I was not down on RR. I knew he was trying to make Nehlen pro style set of guys into a spread offense and thus had an atrocious first season. The guys weren't bad, just not to his style. But after watching the 2002 Miami and VT games with RR, it was apparent that he was onto something. I did think he let prima donna attitudes poison the 2003 and 2004 teams. Stewart on the other hand, I was skeptical from the get go due to his resume. The opening loss to ECU by scoring only 3 points with what he inherited reinforced that skepticism. Over the next 2 seasons he proved that he was just to stubborn to adapt. Especially not winning the Big East with a defense that gave up less than 13 points/game during league play and refusing to acknowledge that the offense was a problem. [/QUOTE]

Name