OT: Deer hunters: .45-70 or 35 Whelen?

Cohendawg

Redshirt
Sep 18, 2006
404
0
0
I'm considering getting one of these to expand my hunting season. Right now the only rifle I have is a Remington 7400 30-06. But would like to add one of these two for the "primitive" dates.
 

Cohendawg

Redshirt
Sep 18, 2006
404
0
0
I'm considering getting one of these to expand my hunting season. Right now the only rifle I have is a Remington 7400 30-06. But would like to add one of these two for the "primitive" dates.
 

Big Sheep81

Freshman
Feb 24, 2008
2,130
54
48
Get the 45-70 by all means. If you want to be able to shoot with your eyes open and no Ben-Gay after get the Whelen. Or, if you want to be somewhere in between try the .444 Marlin. Both have significantly less recoil although the .444 Marlin is still a little strong, especially in the single shot. The .444 Marlin is a great lever action caliber as well when shooting the Hornandy ammo. Also easy to hand load. The Whelen has been around a long time and is a great round that is easy to load as well.

Merry Christmas
 

PineGroveBully

Redshirt
Nov 13, 2007
8,508
0
0
Also a 30-06er, and was wanting a 45-70. My gunsmith recommended a .444 instead and now I'd take nothing for it. This one is a H&R handi-rifle with camo stock. Think I gave $299, but you could get the black synthetic for about $50 less, but I assume both have gone up since then. I mounted a Nikon 3x9x40 on it and I now hunt with it during regular season more than my aught6. I love it's compactness. If I'm hunting a huge greenfield where it's possible multiple shots may be needed I still use the rifle but I'm in thick spots the majority of the time where I'm not going to get but one shot anyway, so I'm now more comfortable with the 444. The shells are a little salty. All I have shot out of it are the Hornadys, but I've heard some say they get better grouping out of the winchesters
 

Joe Schmedlap

Redshirt
Aug 11, 2010
1,334
33
48
-More versatile with better ballistics. It is an awesome brush gun for whitetails. As an aside, it is considered a fine caliber for black bears as well, if you ever plan to hunt for black bears. You will have to look somewhere other than Mississippi to find them, which makes Ole Miss's mascot choice absurd. Probably about as many General Ackbars in Mississippi as there are black bears.
 
May 2, 2007
89
0
0
I have the 45-70. It is pretty much a short range weapon and loses accuracy at more than 100 yards. The handi rifle is cheap and ammo is easy to find. In my opinion the recoil is not bad. Don't believe the jazz about one caliber being a better "brush round" than another, field tests have shown that even small twigs divert common rounds equally.
 

buddawg

Redshirt
Aug 26, 2009
198
0
0
Ballistcally it's just a little less than the 30-06, but has way more knock down power. 225 grain or more bullet in a necked up 06 casing.
It still has fairly heavy recoil, but not as bad as a 45-70. A fellow came to hunt with me last week and had a CVA Apex in 35 Whelen. Nice looking gun.
 

dobberdawg

Redshirt
Nov 16, 2010
5
0
0
I switched from the 30-06 three years ago. Recoil and accuracy are the same w/rem core lokt ammo. My father in law had a 45-70 before his 35 and will also tell you the 35 is better. I have the TC Encore, pricey but worth it.
 

Dawgpack

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
41
0
0
I have a 45-70 and would rather go to a opera with my wife than sight that rifle in again. Great gun but it's not shoulder friendly. Father-n-law just bought 35 and likes it a lot. Whichever you buy research your bullets you buy.
 

RougeDawg

Redshirt
Jul 12, 2010
1,474
0
0
Most of the smaller stores do not carry them, and even when I stop in Cabelas, they normally are out of all the decent bullets for it. I dont shoot mine much, but you should check on availbility of bullets when making your decision.

The 45-70 doesn't really kick much. I have a 7mm and .300 rimfires and they all kick around the same. For the few times a year you will shoot it, it doesnt matter to me. </p>
 

Cohendawg

Redshirt
Sep 18, 2006
404
0
0
I was leaning towards the Whelen, and these responses have confirmed what I was already thinking.
 

Uncle Ruckus

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2011
13,376
3,787
113
Get the hornady superformance ammo. You pretty much got a single shot 30-06. Cva scout is the way to go. Unless you have a thompson center, they are out of 35 barrels right now though. Have been for a while and will be till after the season most likely.
 

OzarkaNSW

Redshirt
Jul 12, 2010
763
0
0
It matters not. If either gun makes contact with the animal of your choice your going to knock the 17 out of it. Happy Hunting.
 

Big3Lurker

Redshirt
Dec 17, 2009
54
0
0
and it is alot of fun if you do, the 35w is a TRUE 300 yard hunting rifle. My Apex gets 2910fps with Barnes 200gr tipped boattail bullets.3" high sighted at 100 gives me a hit in the vitals all the way to 300yds! By the way, I have loaded the 45-70barnes 300gr socom tipped boattail bullets to 2400fps for an Apex. Absolute elephant medicine and felt like it on the other end to! Handloading is alot of fun and not that expensive with Leeequipment and you can really improve on factory ammo_On one last note, the Hornady SuperPerformance ammo is good stuff. Itperform on my crono out of my Apex within 20fps of what it was advertised, would highly recomend it.
 

MaxwellSmart

Senior
May 28, 2007
2,409
707
113
I handload for all my hunting rifles and pistols plus my centerfire plinkers. The hobby is very enjoyable and you can turn a so so shooter into a tack driver if your willing to put in the time and work developing your loads. As for the choice in this thread, Col. Townsend Whelen's cartriged is very a very capable round and more comfortable to shoot than the 45-70.
 

colodawg

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
427
0
0
I have the 45 - 70 and love it. It kicks no more than my 7 mag and is quite accurate to 100+ yards. I have a Nikon scope and am comfortable taking it with me in timber for both elk and bear as well as mulies.

Don't believe the shoulder stuff. I am 70 years old and the recoil does not bother me.

Sure the 35 Whelen is a good weapon, but I really like my 45 - 70. </p>
 
Oct 29, 2009
2,574
429
83
colodawg said:
I have the 45 - 70 and love it. It kicks no more than my 7 mag and is quite accurate to 100+ yards. I have a Nikon scope and am comfortable taking it with me in timber for both elk and bear as well as mulies.

Don't believe the shoulder stuff. I am 70 years old and the recoil does not bother me.

Sure the 35 Whelen is a good weapon, but I really like my 45 - 70. </p>

I have both, and I prefer my 45-70.....to be honest, i don't really hunt with either that much, but I find my 45-70 to be far more accurate and much more of a "bulldozer" of a deer killer....


both are good weapons, like you said, but neither are great....
 

sardis

Redshirt
Dec 3, 2008
411
0
0
only 8 inch drop at 300 yards with Hornady Superperfoirmance ammo 200 gr. I finds it better than the heavy 30-06 ammo accuracy. The 338 win mag killed the 35 as the 30-30 killed the 45-70.
 
Nov 16, 2005
26,211
17,769
113
It's great for hunting in thick brush or thickets where you need it to shoot through the brush. When you hit a deer with it, it's going down. Big knockdown power. I'm not going to use it somewhere with a long shot. If I'm doing longer shots I'm going to use my Weatherby .270.