OT: Do not shoplift

weblow

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
2,860
3
38
 
Sep 29, 2012
234
17
18
Nobody in their right mind would condone shoplifting but that sucker punch is a coward's move to me. If the guy is stealing your sh!+, confront him if you want it stopped.
 

TimberBeast

Senior
Aug 23, 2012
1,090
509
113
Nobody in their right mind would condone shoplifting but that sucker punch is a coward's move to me. If the guy is stealing your sh!+, confront him if you want it stopped.

A coward's move? The guy deserved every bit of that and hopefully will get more in jail time, although I wouldn't hold my breath on that. Of course today the guy stealing stuff is the victim and the guy that stopped him is the criminal.
 

dogfan96

Redshirt
Jun 3, 2007
2,188
12
66
You don't have to sucker punch someone to stop them from shoplifting. Why not just go all the way and shoot him?
 

MagnoliaHunter

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2007
1,508
1,228
113
17 confronting him, he may have a weapon. He came in the store intending to steal stuff. He ABSOLUTELY deserved what he got. The puncher should get an award. You sir, are an idiot.
 
Aug 22, 2012
1,211
322
83
+1

A coward's move? The guy deserved every bit of that and hopefully will get more in jail time, although I wouldn't hold my breath on that. Of course today the guy stealing stuff is the victim and the guy that stopped him is the criminal.


Totally agree. What a backwards way of thinking. Here you have what looks to be a small business owner trying to make an honest living. Some thug, who I assume has done this many times before, is the "victim" of a cowardess move? Pfffft please.
 

Hanmudog

Redshirt
Apr 30, 2006
5,853
0
0
If that was made perfectly legal then we would have a hell of a lot less shoplifting.
 

The Peeper

Heisman
Feb 26, 2008
15,452
10,594
113
He was confronted and he was stopped and in your mind sucker punch is worse than shoplifting, really? He should have been kicked in the nuts while he was laying there waiting for the cops to haul his sorry *** away.
 

PBRME

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2004
10,892
4,569
113
I worked at Sears in Memphis in my younger days. More than once security had guns pulled on them when they confronted shoplifters.

There was a gang that was hitting Sears hard. One of the security officers had his house and driveway tagged with death threats. What makes it worse was his brother, a Shelby County Officer, lived with him. When I quit they still hadn't caught them. The security manager at Southland got curb stomped at gun point.
 

boatsandhoes

Junior
Sep 6, 2012
2,151
208
63
Why in the hell do people defend a person blatantly breaking the law?

If you break in a home you have forfeited your rights. If you make a choice to steal things you deserve what you got coming.

I like seeing Jimmy Johns get knocked the 17 out. I hate when mississippi kids go play for bama----->Kevin Norwood, Freddie Milons, Deshea, Dewayne Rudd, etc
 
Last edited:

treeddeep

Redshirt
Jun 7, 2013
1,061
0
0
b-b-bring bring amberlamps
Honestly the guy that hit him is a moron too. Have fun getting a battery charge knocking some dude senseless for your retail gig.
 

Philly Dawg

All-American
Oct 6, 2012
12,292
6,840
113
I thought they had to wait until the guy was leaving the store with the goods before it was shoplifting. If so, then the guy making the punch might get sued. But I sure wouldn't charge him if I were a cop.

You should also get punched for being that bad at shoplifting. Everyone in the store probably saw that.
 

Uncle Ruckus

All-American
Apr 1, 2011
14,372
5,262
113
Some of you are 17in pussies. Stealing is the lowest thing someone can do. The only thing I didn't like about the whole deal was that he didn't hit his head on anything falling down
 

Shamoan

Redshirt
Jun 27, 2013
12,466
0
0
shoplifing isnt cool, but neither is vigilante enforcement of shoplifting. leave it to the rent-a-cop.
 

dudehead

Senior
Jul 9, 2006
1,545
605
113
Is that not perfectly legal?

The employee/owner committed battery.

The business owner could be liable for damages depending on the state's duty of care law owed to customers (yes, even if the customer is a thief or a trespasser).

Generally, you cannot protect your property - in your home or business - with lethal force. You may only use lethal force to protect yourself against the threat of imminent harm which does not appear to be the case here.

This may not be lethal force. The recent incidences of "knockout" in various states that have resulted in death suggest otherwise.

Personal commentary: America is a screwed up place now. When business owners/employees do this to customers (even if they are thiefs) or when kids play games like knockout, you have a very sick, sick culture. I guess that's what happens when half the kids now grow up without a father that will kick their *** and they spend so much of their time consuming a culture of violence in our movies, music, and games. It's no wonder their hearts and minds are just hardened and numb. My generation really screwed the pooch if this is what we taught this next generation to be. Damn. Just damn.
 

TaleofTwoDogs

All-Conference
Jun 1, 2004
4,087
1,827
113
So, if stealing is the lowest thing someone can do, then where does murder, rape, kidnapping, torture and arson appear on your list? Not to mention being ******* on by everybody in the SEC West - I would think that is lower than shoplifting.
 

o_Hot Rock

Senior
Jan 2, 2010
1,835
766
113
You are wrong

shoplifing isnt cool, but neither is vigilante enforcement of shoplifting. leave it to the rent-a-cop.

You stealing from me, then you loose all rights. Shoplifting isn't cute, I should be allowed to kill you for stealing from me if i choose and screw anyone that says different.

If that were true, there would be a lot fewer thugs on this planet.
 

o_Hot Rock

Senior
Jan 2, 2010
1,835
766
113
Yes and no

I thought they had to wait until the guy was leaving the store with the goods before it was shoplifting. If so, then the guy making the punch might get sued. But I sure wouldn't charge him if I were a cop.

You should also get punched for being that bad at shoplifting. Everyone in the store probably saw that.

Many stores have policies that require the employees to wait until they are at least past the cash register. Many even require them to ask, "Will there be anything else?" or something of that nature. But... Once you conceal it, it can be considered shoplifting but it's more difficult to prove in court. You leave the local courts an out to let them off. I was going to pay for that!

As far as punching they guy? He is in more trouble than the guy shoplifting. That's wrong, but the truth.

As much as I can't stand shoplifters, at least they aren't employees. You can somewhat control customers stealing but if it gets into the employees, they will put you into bankruptcy. I absolutely hate a thief. Can you tell?
 

natchezdawg

Redshirt
Oct 4, 2009
1,239
0
0
I'm with you. Petty theft is right up there with cold blooded murder and rape in my book. They all indicate a lack of respect for life, liberty, and property. People who do not respect those ideals are of no value to the human race, and should be eliminated from the gene pool.
 

treeddeep

Redshirt
Jun 7, 2013
1,061
0
0
I'm with you. Petty theft is right up there with cold blooded murder and rape in my book. They all indicate a lack of respect for life, liberty, and property. People who do not respect those ideals are of no value to the human race, and should be eliminated from the gene pool.
I've never stolen a thing in my life but this is the dumbest thing I've ever read.
 

treeddeep

Redshirt
Jun 7, 2013
1,061
0
0
How does someone lose all of their rights when they steal? And what in the world makes you think you can murder someone for stealing from you?
 

natchezdawg

Redshirt
Oct 4, 2009
1,239
0
0
I exaggerated a bit

No need to kill 'em.

A good old fashioned *** kicking will suffice, I suppose.
 

tuku 2

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
197
0
0
That guy deserves a raise. He is keeping cost of goods low and maximizing profits.
 
Sep 11, 2012
410
0
0
So, you don't lose all your rights, just the ones that you, Natchezdawg, decide he should lose at any given moment based solely on your perception of what the alleged criminal has done. You can't argue with that rock solid logic.

I love the people in this thread saying that those who are actually aware of two hundred year old judicial precedent are "wrong".