OT -- Dropping some Steven D Lee Knowledge off

TheBigDA

Redshirt
Aug 29, 2008
1,758
0
0
http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/biographies/stephen-d-lee-1.html


Stephen D. Lee
LIEUTENANT GENERAL
SEPTEMBER 23, 1833 – MAY 28, 1908



Stephen D. Lee
Stephen Dill Lee graduated 17th out of 46 from the United States Military Academy in 1854. He briefly served with the United States Army during the Seminole Wars, as well as in several outposts in the West, before resigning his commission with the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861.


He first entered the Confederate army as an aide-de-camp and captain for General P. G. T. Beauregard. When Beauregard began organizing companies of artillery Lee was given command of one, and promoted to major in the Confederate army. He commanded a battery of guns under General Joseph E. Johnston, served as chief of artillery for General Lafayette McLaws and later for General John Magruder. He served with distinction through the battles of Seven Pines, Savage’s Station, the Seven Days, and Malvern Hill. Lee then transferred to command a battalion of artillery under General James Longstreet. He fought in the Second Battle of Bull Run as well as Antietam. At Antietam his guns played an important role during the fight for Dunker Church.


On November 6, 1862, Lee was promoted to brigadier general and assigned to command the artillery at Vicksburg under General John C. Pemberton. Lee performed well at the battle of Champion Hill and throughout the Vicksburg Campaign. When Vicksburg fell, Lee was captured with many of its defenders. While awaiting parole, Lee was promoted to major general on August 3, 1862 and was placed in command of cavalry within the Department of Mississippi and West Tennessee. Once released in an exchange Lee’s command extended to Alabama and East Louisiana. Lee’s men scored a victory at the battle of Brice’s Crossroads, but were defeated at the battle of Tupelo.


On June 23, 1864, Lee was appointed a lieutenant general, making him the youngest man to reach the rank in the Confederate Army. He took command of General John B. Hood’s former corps within the Army of Tennessee. He commanded this corps through the Atlanta Campaign, including the battles of Jonesborough, Franklin, and Nashville. After the Atlanta Campaign much of his corps was left in ruins. At the end of the war Lee joined General Joseph E. Johnston for the Carolina Campaign and in April he and Johnston surrendered. After the war, Lee served as governor of Mississippi, as well as the first president of Mississippi State College.
 

natchezdawg

Redshirt
Oct 4, 2009
1,239
0
0
He commanded this corps through the Atlanta Campaign, including the battles of Jonesborough, Franklin, and Nashville. After the Atlanta Campaign much of his corps was left in ruins.

Our legacy of getting our asses kicked goes back further than I thought....
 
Nov 19, 2012
1,157
0
0
Being outnumbered 3:1 and having an army of 15 and 50 year olds with squirrel guns vs repeating rifles and seige morters will do that to you. THe Conferderacy should be ashamed of its cause but not its fighting prowess. The yanks positively sucked in the field mano a mano against the rebs. Kind of like their football teams.
 

AFDawg

Senior
Apr 28, 2010
3,276
519
113
When is Lee going to put together a half decent recruiting class?**
 

HammerOfTheDogs

All-Conference
Jun 20, 2001
10,766
1,568
113
In the Western Theatre, The Union had all the good generals (Grant, Sherman, Thomas, Sheridan, etc.) while the Confederates' sucked (Bragg, Hood). S.D. Lee and N.B. Forrest were the best of a bad lot.
 

barely

Redshirt
Aug 28, 2012
73
0
0
ehh, unlimited resources make any general look good. Grant just had a ton of bodies to catch the confederate balls, his own men referred to him as The Butcher. Sherman was just a terrorist.
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,508
20,461
113
Yep if you gave Brag and Hood the resources and men that the Union had, they aren't so bad. The Confederacy had an all star collection of generals, they just didn't have the men or resources.
 

HammerOfTheDogs

All-Conference
Jun 20, 2001
10,766
1,568
113
Grant fought like he did because he knew he had the resources....

ehh, unlimited resources make any general look good. Grant just had a ton of bodies to catch the confederate balls, his own men referred to him as The Butcher. Sherman was just a terrorist.

All the previous generals (Pope, McLellan, Burnside, Hooker, Meade) all tried to outsmart Robert E. Lee and were totally psyched out by him. Grant knew he outnumbered the Rebs 2:1 and made sure he kept up the pressure.

Sherman fought the way he did because he lived in the South before the war, and knew they were a proud, arrogant bunch. He employed what was basically standard 20th Century World War II-era tactics to destroy the South's morale.

Probably the best General on either side was George Thomas. He saved the Union from destruction at Chickamauga, and every major battle where he was in charge, he utterly destroyed the enemy (Battle of Nashville).

If you gave Hood unlimited resources, he'd have probably done well. If you gave them to Bragg, he'd had wasted half his troops in battle, and executed the other half for cowardice.