Todd made a comment in another post about making Jackson safer, so I felt like I should share this conversation I had this past week with Pittsburgh's former mayor Tom Murphy.
Murphy was mayor in Pittsburgh from 1994-2005. When he began office, he had a city that had been trending downward for decades. They had lost their economic base (steel), and the city was crime-ridden; everyone was fleeing to the suburbs, much like Jackson and other large and mid-sized cities. Although the city was broke, he was extremely aggressive getting the city to
partner with local developers to redevelop the city's abandoned steel
mill properties.When he left office, he had helped transform it into a safer, thriving, happening place, where big companies like Google (regional office) and American Eagle (headquarters), among others, started to relocate.
I asked him point-blank how he got crime down in Pittsburgh, because I was from a top 15 crime city and was frustrated with the status quo. What he told me was fairly simplistic, however, it is extremely true. He told me that New York City had 2,400 murders in 1993, 1,550 in 1995, and 920 in 1998. So from 1993, when they started to focus on cracking down on crime, to 1998, they saw a 62% murder rate drop in FIVE years. Now they're one of the safest large cities in the world. Murphy told me, "It's a choice. Crime management is a choice." He then went on to say how he recently went to an area in Baltimore that's the largest drug market between Virginia to New York. The cops had these guys on camera slinging dope, but never tried to break anything up because the police's priority is on violent crimes. They chose not to act.
Sixpackers, I agree with Murphy and submit to you that it is in fact a choice, and a choice that our city government is not choosing. Murphy said to reduce crime like NY did, and like Pitt did, it takes these three things:
1. It has to be made a PRIORITY. "If people don't feel safe, nothing works." The powers that be either have to tackle it head-on, or nothing significant will change.
2. There has to be leadership. This is obviously a no-brainer, but we need to go recruit outside of the state for someone who's been effective in significantly reducing crime in mid-sized cities before.
3. Get the police the technology to not only react to the crimes, but to get ahead of the crimes before they happen. I cannot say I truly know what he was talking about here, but I know there's police stuff out there I'm just ignorant of. *Minority Report is going through my head here*
The bottom line is this- you create VALUE when the crime rate drops. The public schools still suck, and the infrastructure isn't great, but this has to be the first priority if we are to see Jackson grow and thrive. There's a lot of great things happening in downtown, and there's more to come, but in order for those things to truly catch fire, crime must be reduced. So Jacksonians, I urge you to push for a progressive public body that "gets it." We all have seen what happens when a transformational leader comes in (Foglesong), and people who "get it" are put in the right place (Byrne/Mullen).
I think it should be noted that, although frustrated, I am a huge supporter of Jackson, and always will be because it is the lifeblood of this state.
Murphy was mayor in Pittsburgh from 1994-2005. When he began office, he had a city that had been trending downward for decades. They had lost their economic base (steel), and the city was crime-ridden; everyone was fleeing to the suburbs, much like Jackson and other large and mid-sized cities. Although the city was broke, he was extremely aggressive getting the city to
partner with local developers to redevelop the city's abandoned steel
mill properties.When he left office, he had helped transform it into a safer, thriving, happening place, where big companies like Google (regional office) and American Eagle (headquarters), among others, started to relocate.
I asked him point-blank how he got crime down in Pittsburgh, because I was from a top 15 crime city and was frustrated with the status quo. What he told me was fairly simplistic, however, it is extremely true. He told me that New York City had 2,400 murders in 1993, 1,550 in 1995, and 920 in 1998. So from 1993, when they started to focus on cracking down on crime, to 1998, they saw a 62% murder rate drop in FIVE years. Now they're one of the safest large cities in the world. Murphy told me, "It's a choice. Crime management is a choice." He then went on to say how he recently went to an area in Baltimore that's the largest drug market between Virginia to New York. The cops had these guys on camera slinging dope, but never tried to break anything up because the police's priority is on violent crimes. They chose not to act.
Sixpackers, I agree with Murphy and submit to you that it is in fact a choice, and a choice that our city government is not choosing. Murphy said to reduce crime like NY did, and like Pitt did, it takes these three things:
1. It has to be made a PRIORITY. "If people don't feel safe, nothing works." The powers that be either have to tackle it head-on, or nothing significant will change.
2. There has to be leadership. This is obviously a no-brainer, but we need to go recruit outside of the state for someone who's been effective in significantly reducing crime in mid-sized cities before.
3. Get the police the technology to not only react to the crimes, but to get ahead of the crimes before they happen. I cannot say I truly know what he was talking about here, but I know there's police stuff out there I'm just ignorant of. *Minority Report is going through my head here*
The bottom line is this- you create VALUE when the crime rate drops. The public schools still suck, and the infrastructure isn't great, but this has to be the first priority if we are to see Jackson grow and thrive. There's a lot of great things happening in downtown, and there's more to come, but in order for those things to truly catch fire, crime must be reduced. So Jacksonians, I urge you to push for a progressive public body that "gets it." We all have seen what happens when a transformational leader comes in (Foglesong), and people who "get it" are put in the right place (Byrne/Mullen).
I think it should be noted that, although frustrated, I am a huge supporter of Jackson, and always will be because it is the lifeblood of this state.