I don't consider any music worth paying $.99-$1.29 a song for because I think it's a complete ripoff and communist in all honesty. I would guess this would stir some people up, but with the technical advances we've made in the world if we are still trying to pawn songs off for a dollar or more apiece I do and will not continue to ever support it.
I've got over 700 songs on my apple devices and I haven't paid for the first one. I understand musicians should be paid for their craft, but until the price is lowered to a fair market value they won't get the first penny.
Those tech advances allow you to now get the 2-6 songs on an album you actually like, instead of forcing you to buy the whole thing. What used to cost $10-18 now costs $2-6. And if you want the whole album, many are $10 total.
What actually is a 'fair market value'? Since itunes is the ubergod of music and has played a major part in Apple becoming the most valuable company of all time, i would say they are charging a fair market value due to the usership.
But hey, thats just my crazy way of defining your term.
Mumford's new album
Rill Rill by Sleigh Bells
Imagine Dragons
Springsteen's new album
Cut it Out by Kitten
Just a few of the random recent additions ive made. All different geres.