Pete Maravich of the women's game. SC covered her with everybody. Didn't make a difference - 41 pts.
She definitely has better range.She's a better shooter than most of our MBB guys...
Most?She's a better shooter than most of our MBB guys...
Off double teams she made great passes. What a player!I watched 2 minutes of highlights and what I never saw was SC throwing 2 at her and forcing out of her hands. Maybe they tried that but not clear from the highlights!
They doubled her. Found the open player every time. Best player in college basketball this year. Not even closeI watched 2 minutes of highlights and what I never saw was SC throwing 2 at her and forcing out of her hands. Maybe they tried that but not clear from the highlights!
She is not just another Iowa player that can shoot as said above she is for us older guys the Pete Maravich of women's basketball just unbelievable she is single handedly willing them to victory!!Another Iowa player that can shoot, shocker
Your right I just got this Instagram of this 14 year old 6'10" kid playing a game against what looked like 5th graders thats how it was with the 6'7" girl on South Carolina only thing is every time they tried to box her out they called a foul. I didn't look at the final box score but USC probably had 25 offensive rebounds and Caitlin wasn't even guarding her girl although she did make a couple of 3's late in the gameThe match-up reminded me of a 4th grade rec basketball team. One team had a bunch of big kids who rebound virtually every shot, but couldn’t shoot Other team had a short kid who could shoot lights out.
Totally weird matchup considering especially it was a National semi final. Caitlin though was spectacular and also played even better when the pressure was on.
Just checked it was 26 offensive rebounds and 49 to 25 overall yet Iowa still won!!!Your right I just got this Instagram of this 14 year old 6'10" kid playing a game against what looked like 5th graders thats how it was with the 6'7" girl on South Carolina only thing is every time they tried to box her out they called a foul. I didn't look at the final box score but USC probably had 25 offensive rebounds and Caitlin wasn't even guarding her girl although she did make a couple of 3's late in the game
Nope bad coaching no doubles or traps except on ball screens. Bad weak side helpI watched 2 minutes of highlights and what I never saw was SC throwing 2 at her and forcing out of her hands. Maybe they tried that but not clear from the highlights!
She’s a better shooter than 99.9% of all men’s ncaa players. Probably the best shooter in women’s ncaa history.She's a better shooter than most of our MBB guys...
Most exciting player across men’s / women’s CBB in several years
Seriously. I never watch women’s basketball, but this one was entertaining. She was a savage. Trying step back threes and draining some of them in the defender’s face. Oof. She, along with Paige Bueckers on UConn, is what women’s basketball needs.First women’s game I’ve seen in about 5 years and stayed with it because of her. Wow!
Can you imagine a Clark-Bueckers game next March. Wow!Seriously. I never watch women’s basketball, but this one was entertaining. She was a savage. Trying step back threes and draining some of them in the defender’s face. Oof. She, along with Paige Bueckers on UConn, is what women’s basketball needs.
They ran a pick and roll we can only dream of!! But when they do double she ALWAYS finds the open girl she just has great court visionNope bad coaching no doubles or traps except on ball screens. Bad weak side help
She's why you tuned in. The womens' basketball marketers need to run with posts like yoursSeriously. I never watch women’s basketball, but this one was entertaining. She was a savage. Trying step back threes and draining some of them in the defender’s face. Oof. She, along with Paige Bueckers on UConn, is what women’s basketball needs.
SC star and No 1 pro pick this year got the star treatment there, no doubt.Watching her play is a joy.
WBB has progressed enough to be worth watching as the talent level has become far better over the years and Caitlin is proof of that.
Also the physical play has become more of a factor without being overly aggressive.
Many knock Stanly's SC team for the way it plays, but I feel that teams style makes WBB watching better as long as the players don't push and shove others out of the way in a way that can cause injuries.
Towards the end of Iowa's win over SC I feel the refs blew an overly physical play that should have been a foul by a SC player trying to strip the ball from an Iowa player, but the reff only called it a jump ball and didn't do nothing about the Iowa player being tossed to the ground by the SC player attempting to take the ball away.
But all in all I thought the game was well plated by both teams and the refs did a good job.
I didn't watch the game but I just watched the highlights. Now I understand. I didn't realize one team is all white and one team is all black. This country gets so emotional when race is involved. People need to chill out. It just people playing basketball.Staley went on a rant post game. Said people in the media covering her sport are calling her players bar fighters, thugs, monkeys, and street fighters. Quite an accusation. Must be nice to be able to make accusations like that and not have to back them up with any kind of follow up or examples.
Funny how that's a point of emphasis in many successful programs.Another Iowa player that can shoot, shocker
I don’t care for Staley personally. Something about her rubs me the wrong wayStaley went on a rant post game. Said people in the media covering her sport are calling her players bar fighters, thugs, monkeys, and street fighters. Quite an accusation. Must be nice to be able to make accusations like that and not have to back them up with any kind of follow up or examples.
She’s always been a race baiter.Staley went on a rant post game. Said people in the media covering her sport are calling her players bar fighters, thugs, monkeys, and street fighters. Quite an accusation. Must be nice to be able to make accusations like that and not have to back them up with any kind of follow up or examples.