Anyone of you with kids playing sports knows that today, kids are playing baseball, basketball, soccer year around. Football isn’t quite as bad but…. There are tournament teams, summer teams, and 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] teams and most kids play for them all. Also, there is a movement now to form regional “tournament” teams….beyond and better than local tournament teams. I know of kids traveling 25-90 miles to practice and play with teams that are chosen teams for the purpose of being able to compete with any team in any tournament in the entire Southeast.
So, your little Johnny (10-12 years old) is very good at his particular sport. He plays on a local tournament team with kids from around town and they play in a later summer league team. Now, his coach wants to form another team with kids from all the surrounding towns chosing only the best from your local team. For the purpose of going to tournaments in Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, Missouri and so on and competing at a higher level against the best from those states. Lets say little Johnny practices 4 days a week 10 months of the year. Plays in numerous tournaments during the spring and summer. Plays in another countless number of single games during a weeknight over the year. Now a few dads, say “hey, our future MLBers can’t get behind during this time off.” So the dads form winter workouts. At what point does a parent say enough is enough? Even if the kid loves it and wants to play/practice everyday (at 10-12) at want point do you protect the kid from themselves, other coaches/dads and burn out? Or do you push them to be the best they can be? I know every situation is different but at some point you have to draw a line.
The story of the BYU football player that is likely to get drafted that didn’t start playing football until 2010, got me to thinking this morning. I doubt parents in Ghana take their kids all over west Africa playing ball. But the counter argument is, he is obviously a great athlete but got cut twice from BYU basketball.
So, your little Johnny (10-12 years old) is very good at his particular sport. He plays on a local tournament team with kids from around town and they play in a later summer league team. Now, his coach wants to form another team with kids from all the surrounding towns chosing only the best from your local team. For the purpose of going to tournaments in Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, Missouri and so on and competing at a higher level against the best from those states. Lets say little Johnny practices 4 days a week 10 months of the year. Plays in numerous tournaments during the spring and summer. Plays in another countless number of single games during a weeknight over the year. Now a few dads, say “hey, our future MLBers can’t get behind during this time off.” So the dads form winter workouts. At what point does a parent say enough is enough? Even if the kid loves it and wants to play/practice everyday (at 10-12) at want point do you protect the kid from themselves, other coaches/dads and burn out? Or do you push them to be the best they can be? I know every situation is different but at some point you have to draw a line.
The story of the BYU football player that is likely to get drafted that didn’t start playing football until 2010, got me to thinking this morning. I doubt parents in Ghana take their kids all over west Africa playing ball. But the counter argument is, he is obviously a great athlete but got cut twice from BYU basketball.
Last edited: