OT: Missing Titanic Sub

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,080
17,742
97
Anyone else following this story closely? A sub carrying 5 people to view the Titanic has been missing since Sunday.

Anyone have theories on what happened? I figured a catastrophic failure happened on way down…causing the vessel to lose contact..and likely killing the crew instantly. However, overnight reports indicating rescuers have identified “banging noises” coming from the area of the expedition. Is crew still alive? Is vessel caught onto the Titanic? (Pretty much making recovery impossible)? Has it surfaced somewhere? No way to get out of it…and estimated only 24 hours of oxygen left inside the vessel. Nightmare fuel for sure.
 
Sep 27, 2006
20,274
23,340
0
Last edited:

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
I've been following it a bit. The last paragraph of this article is something I've not seen before .. the vessel started it's decent at 8pm, due to return at 3pm. but it lost contact with authorities one hour 45 minutes into the trip & authorities waited two hours 40 minutes AFTER it was due back to sound an alarm.


There is a CBS reporter who went on a voyage with these folks and did a piece on it. He casually mentioned the other day on Twitter that another dive during the same voyage (not the one he was one) went 'missing' for 5 hours.

Why anybody would go to the bottom of the ocean with this particular company is beyond my understanding.
 

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
Bored rich people with nothing else to do with their money?

Personally, I don't know why someone would want to put themselves into a steel capsule, get bolted in with no way out, and go to the bottom of the ocean at all.
My guess is there's an awful lot that will come out in the next few weeks that puts the company in a not great light whether the submersible is found soon by some miracle or not. The lawsuit that people are referencing from their employee a few years ago is probably the tip of the iceberg (pun not intended).
 

koleszar

Heisman
Jan 1, 2010
35,803
55,715
113
My guess is there's an awful lot that will come out in the next few weeks that puts the company in a not great light whether the submersible is found soon by some miracle or not. The lawsuit that people are referencing from their employee a few years ago is probably the tip of the iceberg (pun not intended).
Saw an interview of a guy who went on one of these. He said the words "Risk of Death " appears 3 times on the first page of the waiver you have to sign and goes on to list all the ways you may die. He said, death is always on your mind.
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
They said that banging was heard every half hour for a bit and then again 4 hours later. Also said the passengers had to sign a waiver knowing that the vehicle wasn't certified. Even if they found it, I don't know that they'd be able to raise it in time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roy_Faulker

rurichdog

Heisman
Sep 30, 2006
116,807
14,389
0
Saw an interview of a guy who went on one of these. He said the words "Risk of Death " appears 3 times on the first page of the waiver you have to sign and goes on to list all the ways you may die. He said, death is always on your mind.
There are some people in this world who gravitate towards activities such as this because of the inherent danger. The billionaire that the news headlines reference appears to be one of those thrill seekers. He's already been to space in one of the travel-to-space-for-cash outfits, and been to the bottom of the Mariana Trench in another submersible.
 

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
Saw an interview of a guy who went on one of these. He said the words "Risk of Death " appears 3 times on the first page of the waiver you have to sign and goes on to list all the ways you may die. He said, death is always on your mind.
There are legal complexities here since it is maritime but generally you can't make people sign a waiver and then that's it - no worries. I don't know details here but everything smells like a company where discovery would show varying degrees of negligence. Plus families of people who can afford to spend 250k on a dive probably have very good attorneys.
 

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
26,664
35,980
113
That's not a good look for the US! (if true)
why? uber rich people doing stupid things need to have the US taxpayer spend even more for what?

Ukraine is bad enough, at some point people need to just say 'fk around and find out'
 

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,360
21,743
113
why? uber rich people doing stupid things need to have the US taxpayer spend even more for what?

Ukraine is bad enough, at some point people need to just say 'fk around and find out'
The US wouldn't be paying for it. Pay attention!
 

brgRC90

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
34,957
15,859
0
I'm not sure how much better it is to be looking out a window at the Titanic versus looking at it through a camera while floating on a ship at the surface. You'll probably see less, in fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet1984

RU05

All-American
Jun 25, 2015
14,490
9,076
113
I'm not sure how much better it is to be looking out a window at the Titanic versus looking at it through a camera while floating on a ship at the surface. You'll probably see less, in fact.
First hand is always better then a screen.
 

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,360
21,743
113
coast guard and navy are there now, who do you think pays for that?

smarten up
You smarten up you dope. What does that have to do with not allowing the British to bring a vehicle that can actually do the job, and on the UK's dime? Let them spend money on rescue and let the US go home.
 

RU05

All-American
Jun 25, 2015
14,490
9,076
113
You smarten up you dope. What does that have to do with not allowing the British to bring a vehicle that can actually do the job, and on the UK's dime? Let them spend money on rescue and let the US go home.
I don't think we'd go home in that scenario. It would just be more people looking.

I don't know if there are drawbacks to having more vehicles in the area. Perhaps it makes it harder to track via sound?
 

SouthJerseyRU

All-Conference
Jan 30, 2002
4,749
3,087
113
From all the reports out, I don't know how people trusted this thing. Apparently it is being controlled by an old gaming controller that I wouldn't use on a gaming pc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ashokan

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,360
21,743
113
I don't think we'd go home in that scenario. It would just be more people looking.

I don't know if there are drawbacks to having more vehicles in the area. Perhaps it makes it harder to track via sound?
Where is the drawback of bringing in a vehicle that can actually do the job?