OT russia russia russia

[atl-cock]

I never mentioned Trump in the post you cited. YOU DID.

Why? Because you have TDS. Did you even bother to read the "goals" that I linked....?? That's not modern. No spin.

Instead of continuing on with your TDS, why don't you just admit the "goals" are uncannily aligned with the democratic party, admit that you have been duped for decades, accept actual reality, and just call it a day????

I don't particularly care for Trump as POTUS if I'm being honest.....but I am not about to argue with his results. The only thing I really wanted out of him his first go round was complete control of SCOTUS....Roe V Wade to be overturned, and for SCOTUS to actually make the 2A official with the following ruling > YES, you can carry a firearm outside of your home for the sole purpose of self defense. (Duh) (But it had never been defined before that ruling) ----- Again, so far, no complaints. The man flat out gets things done. If it hurts liberals little feewings, all the better.

It's the end of our Republic if any government branch has "complete control" of another.

 

[I4CtheFuture]

It's the end of our Republic if any government branch has "complete control" of another.

I tend to agree with you on this, but, SCOTUS is just one part of the Judicial branch. - Dems can still use the courts to block and obstruct - it's just that SCOTUS has the final say.

 

[atl-cock]

I tend to agree with you on this, but, SCOTUS is just one part of the Judicial branch. - Dems can still use the courts to block and obstruct - it's just that SCOTUS has the final say.

Then it goes back to Congress to enact/change legislation.

 

[I4CtheFuture]

Then it goes back to Congress to enact/change legislation.

Not sure I agree with this..... if it's an existing law already, and some activist judge (on either side) interprets the law wrong, SCOTUS sets em' straight on what the law actually is, without any need for congress to intervene, unless it's just egregious. THEN congress could change it, and SCOTUS would have to abide too.

Not arguing with you on this point. I'm pretty sure we agree and are saying the same thing anyway.

 

[b-flag]

Not sure I agree with this..... if it's an existing law already, and some activist judge (on either side) interprets the law wrong, SCOTUS sets em' straight on what the law actually is, without any need for congress to intervene, unless it's just egregious. THEN congress could change it, and SCOTUS would have to abide too.

Not arguing with you on this point. I'm pretty sure we agree and are saying the same thing anyway.

lol the scotus is corrupt to the core
a political wing of maga

 

[b-flag]

people need to buy teslas
trump is worried about tesla
as for the poor saps working for a living....he has a golf tee time

 

[I4CtheFuture]

lol the scotus is corrupt to the core
a political wing of maga

As long as they keep telling liberals "No" - I'm good with it. Whatever it takes.

 

[soxtalklife]

As long as they keep telling liberals "No" - I'm good with it. Whatever it takes.

You are brainwashed.

 

[I4CtheFuture]

You are brainwashed.

Nah. Just speaking the truth. Facts. Etc, - Whatever liberals want = Automatic No. It's wonderful. Glorious.

 

[ThinnyJ]

Here's your leader.... No wonder Russia went in to kick tail.