I didn't study it, but let me guess -- something something Trump?**
As a 6th important signal my vote would go to median net worth per sdult. Median net worth per adult in the US is good for 15th place globally.
See, it was interesting to me because I didn’t realize how much performance was driven by just 7 of the 500. Perhaps it was common knowledge to everyone else, most likely, to your point, not Trump because he is as dumb as a box of rocks?I didn't study it, but let me guess -- something something Trump?**
Honestly him, nor any politician occupies much of my day to day mental bandwidth…
Its actually closer to 7 years. Starts in January 2019.Up 132% over five years is still pretty good.
Did you use this data?- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_wealth_per_adultFortunately economists don't prioritize stock index performances as an indicator of the health of an economy. For a more fundamental and encompassing view, the following metrics make a dash board with 5 main gauges to assess the scope and performance in terms of economic health.
As a 6th important signal my vote would go to median net worth per adult. Median net worth per adult in the US is good for 15th place globally.
Its almost 7 years. Like 6.75 years.Up 132% over five years is still pretty good.
Related to all additional Consumers
Did you use this data?- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_wealth_per_adult
If so, that is 2022 and 2023 data. So the economy was healthy a few years ago, per your 6th important signal.
Cool and all, but it seems like that is a pretty significant lag between data and current situation.
Maybe more updated info shows the same thing though.
Oh, yeah that is a really good editon.No, I used the 16th edition of the UBS Global Wealth Report which was released in 2025 for the 2024 data set.
tbay coming in hot with another Twitter post. Will this one be real, or will it be yet another time where he posts lies, misrepresentations, or half truths?Related to all additional Consumers
stfu. you are wrapped around polictics just as much as you accuse others they are.See, it was interesting to me because I didn’t realize how much performance was driven by just 7 of the 500. Perhaps it was common knowledge to everyone else, most likely, to your point, not Trump because he is as dumb as a box of rocks?
Good lord how do people enjoy anything in a life that is wrapped around politics? I literally never once thought a thing about Trump when looking a the graph or posting the graph. Honestly him, nor any politician occupies much of my day to day mental bandwidth…
He lying as much there as he is about being a former "hard right conservative".
Its almost 7 years. Like 6.75 years.
32% over 6.75 years is not good.
Isnt that like 4.5% growth YOY?
Its almost 7 years. Like 6.75 years.
32% over 6.75 years is not good.
Isnt that like 4.5% growth YOY?
Ha, well look at that.looks like 132% growth. Which is pretty good.
That would be interesting to see - Microsoft passed IBM in the mid 90s, and by the end of the decade had I think 3 times the valuation. Probably the banks/finance in the 80s when Reagan deregulated that industry - same as it ever was is probably correct, although I think the # of public companies has been shrinking in the last decade as more and more stay private/venture cap owned.Probably similar looking chart for other high performing 5 year periods and the biggest 7 or so companies.
We’re # 15! Yes! USA! USA! USA! Clearly the best country!!Fortunately economists don't prioritize stock index performances as an indicator of the health of an economy. For a more fundamental and encompassing view, the following metrics make a dash board with 5 main gauges to assess the scope and performance in terms of economic health.
1. Real GDP Growth
2. Unemployment Rate + JOLTS metrics (lagging indicator)
3. CPI and Core PCE (Inflation)
4. PMI (leading indicator)
5. Yield Curve (recession signal)
As a 6th important signal my vote would go to median net worth per adult. Median net worth per adult in the US is good for 15th place globally.
Now do military and military bases in other countries. And then rank the countries in order of desire to immigrate to. That's a list of 1.We’re # 15! Yes! USA! USA! USA! Clearly the best country!!
Well, if I had known we had the most occupi….errr… military bases in other countries, I would have had much less of a problem paying $14 for 2 pounds of ground chuck! I mean why would I need meat when I could help fund a base in Diego Garcia?Now do military and military bases in other countries. And then rank the countries in order of desire to immigrate to. That's a list of 1.
Now google British Empire, Persian Empire, and Roman Empire.Now do military and military bases in other countries. And then rank the countries in order of desire to immigrate to. That's a list of 1.
Sad that Britain isn't around anymore. First world countries and all.Now google British Empire, Persian Empire, and Roman Empire.
I’m pretty skeptical of that ranking. Not surprised at all by some of the smaller countries ahead of us. But some of the others I have been to and they don’t seem well off.Oh, yeah that is a really good addition.
Interesting that the US state 15th.
I liked your idea, and decided to do it for the 7 years prior to the chart (2012-2018). 5 of the 7 largest companies were the same. Tesla and Nvidia were swapped with Berkshire and Johnson and Johnson. Here are 2012-2018 results, with 2019-2025 in parenthesis:I'd like to see this done with the top 7 companies each year and what their performance was for the five years before and five years after. I imagine there's a historical survivors bias here. We can probably do this in 2030 when it's a slightly different bag of stock (I think AVGO will be on this list) and you'll see the same thing.