Oil money. Their boosters are willing to do whatever it takes to send SMU to P4.Maybe someone can explain further but this doesn’t sound good: “SMU will not receive any media rights revenue for 1st 7 years.”
Maybe someone can explain further but this doesn’t sound good: “SMU will not receive any media rights revenue for 1st 7 years.”
Yea they won't get any tv revenue from the conference for the first 7 years. It's the price they're willing to pay to get into the P4/5. They're known for their boosters. I mean how much money must they be making now in the AAC? I think they might get about 8-9M from the AAC. So if you look at it in those terms it's not too bad. So sort of 63M less than what they're making now over the 7 years and the boosters might pick up that tab.Maybe someone can explain further but this doesn’t sound good: “SMU will not receive any media rights revenue for 1st 7 years.”
Someone here already came up with it. The A&P conference lol.Conferences got to change their names
Well that's the next shoe to drop. The AAC and MWC are both trying to get them to join.time for the PAC-2 to expand lol
Bang up job by the Pac2 commissionertime for the PAC-2 to expand lol
I believe SMU offered this as a way to get inMaybe someone can explain further but this doesn’t sound good: “SMU will not receive any media rights revenue for 1st 7 years.”
this just in - the state of California has sunk into the Atlantic Ocean
UNC, FSU, Clemson all voted against them... NC State changed their vote in the end.Tells me they expect to lose teams to the SEC or BIG. More likely to both.
I’ll take credit for that. They can even use the old logo.Someone here already came up with it. The A&P conference lol.
If you are talking old, PAC 8.Wow, the old Pac 12, college sports and TV, a marriage made in heaven, lol. Thank the Lord for Rutgers location is all I got to say.
Are you going to go @Plum Street with that? I would, make it your signature!!!!I’ll take credit for that. They can even use the old logo.
There have been rumors that changing conference configuration provides some sort of out from the GOR but I think that's just internet bunk. It will still be as hard and costly to get out of the GOR as it was before this expansion. Maybe that PE deal works but it won't be cheap.How is this better for Cal and Stanford at 30% revenue than trying to go to the Big 12? I realize the ACC schools on average have better academic profiles and may be more alike, but taking pennies on the dollar to travel coast to coast seems like a poor decision.
I wonder if adding more slices to the pie helps FSU and Clemson legally challenge the GOR.
From the article:
The expectation entering Friday’s meeting was that at least one member — NC State — planned to support the expansion proposal, giving the league the necessary 12 votes for expansion.
Under the ACC’s most recent proposal, Stanford and Cal would take a reduced TV share (~30% or roughly $8 million) and SMU was expected to take no TV share for as many as nine years. The concessions free up about $55 million to be distributed to ACC teams both evenly and through an incentive pool primarily rewarding football success.
The additional money is coming from ESPN, which is contractually obligated to pay the league a Tier 1 TV share (roughly $24 million) for each additional expansion member - a total of $72 million. The schools would see an escalation in their shares through the Grant of Rights and they’d receive non-TV ACC shares from NCAA tournament, CFP and the incentive pool.
The incentive pool from the additional expansion revenue is heavily weighted on football success. In one proposal circulated among officials, the cash would be distributed based only on football success. It’s unclear if that proposal has been formalized. A school that reaches all football incentives (national title) stands to get as much as $10 million in additional cash
Their boosters probably will.
Yea for sure the 3 new additions have to sign the GOR to join.Did they have to sign that onerous grant of rights? That would be stupid if they did.
And I hope Oregon State wins the PAC 2 this year and show all those yellow-bellied losers who is boss of the PAC!!!!
At plum street is a thing ?Are you going to go @Plum Street with that? I would, make it your signature!!!!
They don’t, according to the stories.What happens once the 3 new schools start receiving a full share over the next 3-7 years? I don't see how this is accretive longer term for the existing ACC schools
They absolutely won’t…like not even a little bit!Love the move for SMU, their boosters are stepping up big time
I'd love to see them competitive and a thorn in the side of UT, A&M, OU, LSU, etc.