OT: Twitter in Absolute Shambles

Status
Not open for further replies.

Col. Angus

Active member
Apr 7, 2017
69,159
207,543
83
I couldn’t give a **** how many followers anyone has on anything. Doesn’t mean **** to me. I don’t correlate legitimacy with other peoples’ opinions or their views on a certain person. I let my own eyes and ears do that. Most celebrities and people with the highest follower counts are ****** morons.
 

IdaCat

Well-known member
May 8, 2004
68,838
33,116
113
I couldn’t give a **** how many followers anyone has on anything. Doesn’t mean **** to me. I don’t correlate legitimacy with other peoples’ opinions or their views on a certain person. I let my own eyes and ears do that. Most celebrities and people with the highest follower counts are ****in morons.
Yeah, you can do that if the opinions aren't censored, shadow banned, or otherwise removed from consideration by ideologues directed by a biased, controlling government.
 

Crums Bald Spot

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2001
9,255
10,942
113
Absolute shambles! Once again, great call OP. You're either a dumber than ish liberal (oxymoron) or an amateur troll. Regardless, can I have your betting favorites? I'll be sure to bet the opposite and make some bank.

#ReverseMidasTouch
 
  • Like
Reactions: hmt5000

roguemocha

New member
Jan 30, 2007
12,943
6,587
0
Absolute shambles! Once again, great call OP. You're either a dumber than ish liberal (oxymoron) or an amateur troll. Regardless, can I have your betting favorites? I'll be sure to bet the opposite and make some bank.

#ReverseMidasTouch
Just fyi, you called someone dumber than **** and then used the word you’re describing them with in the exact opposite manner of its meaning.
 

Crums Bald Spot

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2001
9,255
10,942
113
Just fyi, you called someone dumber than **** and then used the word you’re describing them with in the exact opposite manner of its meaning.
Being a liberal and dumber than ish coincide. Hence, oxymoron.

No thanks necessary, rogue. I like helping the less fortunate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IdaCat

IdaCat

Well-known member
May 8, 2004
68,838
33,116
113
Pro-censorship leftist covidian Ted Lieu has been getting his *** kicked on Twitter today. He posted some erroneous covid data and was fact checked and later called out for posting misleading data by Elon Musk. He deleted that post.

He's not used to free speech, lmao.




Here's another where this dumbass is trying to argue with 2 highly respected infectious disease experts who were previously banned from Twitter for not following the establishment narrative.

 

hmt5000

New member
Aug 29, 2009
26,976
82,647
0
It's weird that @t
Now that they can't control the narrative on Twitter anymore, these globalist pos will use China's Twitter alternative...

Weird that @Nightwish84 wants to wait until the "politicians' do their investigation before he decides what the truth is. I'll bet if he ask's the puppy who knocked over all the plants in the house that the puppy would blame the cat and Nightwish would pet the puppy on the head and punt kick that cat out of the house.
 

roguemocha

New member
Jan 30, 2007
12,943
6,587
0
Being a liberal and dumber than ish coincide. Hence, oxymoron.

No thanks necessary, rogue. I like helping the less fortunate.
No, an oxymoron to you would be a smart liberal. An oxymoron is not a “coincidence” it’s when you have two things that don’t make sense together.

“a figure of speech in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction”

To you, a “dumber than **** liberal” would be terms that ARE in conjunction, hence you said the opposite of what you meant.

No thanks necessary.
 

Crums Bald Spot

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2001
9,255
10,942
113
No, an oxymoron to you would be a smart liberal. An oxymoron is not a “coincidence” it’s when you have two things that don’t make sense together.

“a figure of speech in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction”

To you, a “dumber than **** liberal” would be terms that ARE in conjunction, hence you said the opposite of what you meant.

No thanks necessary.
Apparently you know your morons very well. Must be all the time as a bar tender. Tip of the cap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roguemocha

hmt5000

New member
Aug 29, 2009
26,976
82,647
0
499 stocks on the S&P 500 have performed better than TSLA in 2022.

It's all good, though. At least he's owning the libs, or whatever.
what business decision did he make about tesla to cause that stock price to drop? I feel like you don't realize that he and co's are being attacked for releasing evidence of corruption. The fact you say "owning the libs" at least shows you know who the exposed are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WTF Cat

Anon1640710541

New member
Nov 14, 2002
40,454
53,048
0
The Twitter Files actually show that both the Republicans and the Democrats are engaged in the exact same behaviors -- although the Ds probably did it more "effectively." And the idea that Twitter has suddenly become a haven for FREE SPEECH is absolutely ignoring reality. Musk is doing the exact same thing the previous regime did -- shadow banning, rewriting the rules as he goes along, unilaterally making decisions to fit his worldview, predetermining bans and using all possible reasoning to justify them.....

...sorry, but I'm not like you, I guess. I don't prefer the left or the right side to be the boot stepping on my neck, and I don't support *any* megabillionaire oligarch who controls the media, even if I think he's cool.
 

Col. Angus

Active member
Apr 7, 2017
69,159
207,543
83
A tall midget is an oxymoron.

A smart moron is an oxymoron.

I once thought that being frugal meant you liked to spend money, and then I learned that a frugal money spender is an oxymoron.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,140
0
The Twitter Files actually show that both the Republicans and the Democrats are engaged in the exact same behaviors -- although the Ds probably did it more "effectively." And the idea that Twitter has suddenly become a haven for FREE SPEECH is absolutely ignoring reality. Musk is doing the exact same thing the previous regime did -- shadow banning, rewriting the rules as he goes along, unilaterally making decisions to fit his worldview, predetermining bans and using all possible reasoning to justify them.....

...sorry, but I'm not like you, I guess. I don't prefer the left or the right side to be the boot stepping on my neck, and I don't support *any* megabillionaire oligarch who controls the media, even if I think he's cool.

Wrong. True the same culprits acted while under two different presidents of two different parties. However it's ridiculous to claim both sides did it. You think trump wanted the hunter Biden story suppressed?

The massive suppression is a huge deal. Other than the overall covid response issue, this is the biggest scandal in us history. Agents of the us government (and almost surely the CCP) were actively crafting one of the most effective propaganda campaigns in world history. All while everyone involved denied, under oath, it was happening.
 

Anon1640710541

New member
Nov 14, 2002
40,454
53,048
0
I'm also pissed that rich, powerful people, and the government are engaged in propaganda. I guess the big difference is that you actually seem to be surprised by it.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,140
0
I'm also pissed that rich, powerful people, and the government are engaged in propaganda. I guess the big difference is that you actually seem to be surprised by it.

Hardly surprised. I can assure you I posted about this very thing on this very board years ago and posted about it consistently.

The difference is I care because I know how much something like this matters. None of my opinions are formed by social media, but I am an exception. Most people (especially under 40) are obsessed about their social media image and would never believe none of it was real.

In the midst of this giant propaganda campaign, they ruined the lives of entire generations. Fomo, anxiety/depression, suicide, financial ruin, marriages/relationships ruined....all for one sided political gain. They knew the damage it did, they just didn't care.

Be flippant if you want, but it certainly doesn't prove some intellectual superiority. Quite the opposite. This is something everyone should care about and demand people be accountable.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,140
0

Both parties suck is a strawman and fodder for another thread. In terms of manipulation of social media content, it's a clear one party game. Of course you can also see the CCP fingerprints all over the content too.

This all needs fleshed out and quashed forever. That won't happen but it at least needs to be the goal
 
Status
Not open for further replies.