We are Mississippi State, not North Carolina. We can't expect to get the talent AND the gritty role players with killer instinct. You kinda have to pick your poison when you're a school like ours. As soon as you guys get what you want and Stans gets canned, we will likely tank and after a year or two you will be wishing we had kept him.
I'm not a huge Bury supporter, but I get it when it comes to what he is trying to do. He is not a great play caller but he can recruit the **** out of talent. So, he grabs as many *****'s as he can every single class and tries his best to keep them all. But, when he loses a few to transfers, grades, or discipline, the cupboard is still usually full enough to make it to the dance or the NIT. And while that sucks to not be able to make it further every year, we know that if he ever gets an entire class to stay together, we can make a Final Four with that type of talent. It may not ever happen, but let him leave and we could easily be looking at a tourney appearance every 10 years or worse.
I know that as long as Stans is the coach we have a shot every season to make a run to the tourney. Not many teams out there can say that. That's why I do not want to Cutcliffe the guy and then go through what Arkansas has been going through since Nolan Richardson left. I know Stansbury is no Richardson, but when it comes to basketball tradition, MSU is no Arkansas. The grass is definitely not always greener.
This sounds like a f*cking jeanspage post, but I just don't understand what everybody is expecting from the basketball program. Stansbury would be picked up by someone in a heartbeat if we got rid of him. Mullen can probably win 6-8 games a year and go to small bowls and we will be perfectly content, but Stansbury is expected to win a damn title every year to please everybody. Would it make everybody happier if Stans was not a good recruiter but he was a great X's and O's guy, and he led us to the same amount of tourney appearances and we lost in the first or second round because we went up against more talent and although we outcoach them, their talent is too much to overcome and we lose? No, at least he puts enough talent on the court to give us a shot at a final four. He makes me want to pull my hair out all of the time, but the argument against him isn't as strong as the argument for keeping him.
That is all